Literature DB >> 33290877

Neural tracking of the speech envelope is differentially modulated by attention and language experience.

Rachel Reetzke1, G Nike Gnanateja2, Bharath Chandrasekaran3.   

Abstract

The ability to selectively attend to a speech signal amid competing sounds is a significant challenge, especially for listeners trying to comprehend non-native speech. Attention is critical to direct neural processing resources to the most essential information. Here, neural tracking of the speech envelope of an English story narrative and cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) to non-speech stimuli were simultaneously assayed in native and non-native listeners of English. Although native listeners exhibited higher narrative comprehension accuracy, non-native listeners exhibited enhanced neural tracking of the speech envelope and heightened CAEP magnitudes. These results support an emerging view that although attention to a target speech signal enhances neural tracking of the speech envelope, this mechanism itself may not confer speech comprehension advantages. Our findings suggest that non-native listeners may engage neural attentional processes that enhance low-level acoustic features, regardless if the target signal contains speech or non-speech information.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Amplitude envelope; Attention; Language experience; Neural speech tracking; Speech comprehension

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33290877      PMCID: PMC7856208          DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2020.104891

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Lang        ISSN: 0093-934X            Impact factor:   2.381


  56 in total

1.  Patterns of English phoneme confusions by native and non-native listeners.

Authors:  Anne Cutler; Andrea Weber; Roel Smits; Nicole Cooper
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  Machine Learning Approaches to Analyze Speech-Evoked Neurophysiological Responses.

Authors:  Zilong Xie; Rachel Reetzke; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 3.  Neural Encoding of Attended Continuous Speech under Different Types of Interference.

Authors:  Andrea Olguin; Tristan A Bekinschtein; Mirjana Bozic
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Attentional Selection in a Cocktail Party Environment Can Be Decoded from Single-Trial EEG.

Authors:  James A O'Sullivan; Alan J Power; Nima Mesgarani; Siddharth Rajaram; John J Foxe; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Malcolm Slaney; Shihab A Shamma; Edmund C Lalor
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Early selective-attention effects on the evoked potential: a critical review and reinterpretation.

Authors:  R Näätänen; P T Michie
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 3.251

6.  Speech Intelligibility Predicted from Neural Entrainment of the Speech Envelope.

Authors:  Jonas Vanthornhout; Lien Decruy; Jan Wouters; Jonathan Z Simon; Tom Francart
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-02-20

Review 7.  Temporal coherence and attention in auditory scene analysis.

Authors:  Shihab A Shamma; Mounya Elhilali; Christophe Micheyl
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 13.837

8.  Mechanisms underlying selective neuronal tracking of attended speech at a "cocktail party".

Authors:  Elana M Zion Golumbic; Nai Ding; Stephan Bickel; Peter Lakatos; Catherine A Schevon; Guy M McKhann; Robert R Goodman; Ronald Emerson; Ashesh D Mehta; Jonathan Z Simon; David Poeppel; Charles E Schroeder
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Proficiency differences in syntactic processing of monolingual native speakers indexed by event-related potentials.

Authors:  Eric Pakulak; Helen J Neville
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Human cortical responses to the speech envelope.

Authors:  Steven J Aiken; Terence W Picton
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  3 in total

1.  Neural synchronization is strongest to the spectral flux of slow music and depends on familiarity and beat salience.

Authors:  Kristin Weineck; Olivia Xin Wen; Molly J Henry
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 8.713

2.  The neural processing of pitch accents in continuous speech.

Authors:  Fernando Llanos; James S German; G Nike Gnanateja; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 3.054

3.  Cortical Tracking of the Speech Envelope in Logopenic Variant Primary Progressive Aphasia.

Authors:  Heather R Dial; G Nike Gnanateja; Rachel S Tessmer; Maria Luisa Gorno-Tempini; Bharath Chandrasekaran; Maya L Henry
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.169

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.