Literature DB >> 29049598

Cortical and Sensory Causes of Individual Differences in Selective Attention Ability Among Listeners With Normal Hearing Thresholds.

Barbara Shinn-Cunningham1.   

Abstract

Purpose: This review provides clinicians with an overview of recent findings relevant to understanding why listeners with normal hearing thresholds (NHTs) sometimes suffer from communication difficulties in noisy settings. Method: The results from neuroscience and psychoacoustics are reviewed.
Results: In noisy settings, listeners focus their attention by engaging cortical brain networks to suppress unimportant sounds; they then can analyze and understand an important sound, such as speech, amidst competing sounds. Differences in the efficacy of top-down control of attention can affect communication abilities. In addition, subclinical deficits in sensory fidelity can disrupt the ability to perceptually segregate sound sources, interfering with selective attention, even in listeners with NHTs. Studies of variability in control of attention and in sensory coding fidelity may help to isolate and identify some of the causes of communication disorders in individuals presenting at the clinic with "normal hearing." Conclusions: How well an individual with NHTs can understand speech amidst competing sounds depends not only on the sound being audible but also on the integrity of cortical control networks and the fidelity of the representation of suprathreshold sound. Understanding the root cause of difficulties experienced by listeners with NHTs ultimately can lead to new, targeted interventions that address specific deficits affecting communication in noise. Presentation Video: http://cred.pubs.asha.org/article.aspx?articleid=2601617.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29049598      PMCID: PMC5945067          DOI: 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-H-17-0080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  148 in total

1.  Word recognition in competing babble and the effects of age, temporal processing, and absolute sensitivity.

Authors:  Karen B Snell; Frances M Mapes; Elizabeth D Hickman; D Robert Frisina
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Neural mechanisms of top-down control during spatial and feature attention.

Authors:  B Giesbrecht; M G Woldorff; A W Song; G R Mangun
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Age affects responses on the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) by adults with minimal audiometric loss.

Authors:  Jessica Banh; Gurjit Singh; M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.664

4.  Auditory grouping.

Authors:  C J Darwin
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 5.  Implications of blast exposure for central auditory function: a review.

Authors:  Frederick J Gallun; M Samantha Lewis; Robert L Folmer; Anna C Diedesch; Lina R Kubli; Daniel J McDermott; Therese C Walden; Stephen A Fausti; Henry L Lew; Marjorie R Leek
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2012

6.  Neural correlates of change detection and change blindness.

Authors:  D M Beck; G Rees; C D Frith; N Lavie
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 7.  Change blindness: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Daniel J Simons; Ronald A Rensink
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  Auditory function in normal-hearing, noise-exposed human ears.

Authors:  Greta C Stamper; Tiffany A Johnson
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Reconstructing speech from human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Brian N Pasley; Stephen V David; Nima Mesgarani; Adeen Flinker; Shihab A Shamma; Nathan E Crone; Robert T Knight; Edward F Chang
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Quantifying attentional modulation of auditory-evoked cortical responses from single-trial electroencephalography.

Authors:  Inyong Choi; Siddharth Rajaram; Lenny A Varghese; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  10 in total

1.  Determining the energetic and informational components of speech-on-speech masking in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Gerald Kidd; Christine R Mason; Virginia Best; Elin Roverud; Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Todd Jennings; Kameron Clayton; H Steven Colburn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  A test of model classes accounting for individual differences in the cocktail-party effect.

Authors:  Robert A Lutfi; Briana Rodriguez; Jungmee Lee; Torben Pastore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Neurophysiological investigation of auditory intensity dependence in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Kim De Keyser; Miet De Letter; Patrick Santens; Durk Talsma; Dick Botteldooren; Annelies Bockstael
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2021-01-30       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 4.  Dimension-selective attention as a possible driver of dynamic, context-dependent re-weighting in speech processing.

Authors:  Lori L Holt; Adam T Tierney; Giada Guerra; Aeron Laffere; Frederic Dick
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Introduction to the Research Symposium Forum.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Molecular analysis of individual differences in talker search at the cocktail-party.

Authors:  Robert A Lutfi; Torben Pastore; Briana Rodriguez; William A Yost; Jungmee Lee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 2.482

7.  Cat-astrophic effects of sudden interruptions on spatial auditory attention.

Authors:  Wusheng Liang; Christopher A Brown; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 2.482

8.  Listening in complex acoustic scenes.

Authors:  Andrew J King; Kerry Mm Walker
Journal:  Curr Opin Physiol       Date:  2020-09-08

9.  Dynamic large-scale connectivity of intrinsic cortical oscillations supports adaptive listening in challenging conditions.

Authors:  Mohsen Alavash; Sarah Tune; Jonas Obleser
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Sensorineural hearing loss degrades behavioral and physiological measures of human spatial selective auditory attention.

Authors:  Lengshi Dai; Virginia Best; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 11.205

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.