Literature DB >> 20146603

Auditory target detection is affected by implicit temporal and spatial expectations.

Johanna Rimmele1, Hajnal Jolsvai, Elyse Sussman.   

Abstract

Mechanisms of implicit spatial and temporal orienting were investigated by using a moving auditory stimulus. Expectations were set up implicitly, using the information inherent in the movement of a sound, directing attention to a specific moment in time with respect to a specific location. There were four conditions of expectation: temporal and spatial expectation; temporal expectation only; spatial expectation only; and no expectation. Event-related brain potentials were recorded while participants performed a go/no-go task, set up by anticipation of the reappearance of a target tone through a white noise band. Results showed that (1) temporal expectations alone speeded reaction time and increased response accuracy; and (2) implicit temporal expectations alone independently enhanced target detection at early processing stages, prior to motor response. This was reflected at stages of perceptual analysis, indexed by P1 and N1 components, as well as in task-related stages indexed by N2; and (3) spatial expectations had an effect at later response-related processing stages but only in combination with temporal expectations, indexed by the P3 component. Thus, the results, in addition to indicating a primary role for temporal orienting in audition, suggest that multiple mechanisms of attention interact in different phases of auditory target detection. Our results are consistent with the view from vision research that spatial and temporal attentional control is based on the activity of partly overlapping, and partly functionally specialized neural networks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20146603      PMCID: PMC2894284          DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21437

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  39 in total

Review 1.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain.

Authors:  Maurizio Corbetta; Gordon L Shulman
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks and their relation to inhibition.

Authors:  M Falkenstein; J Hoormann; J Hohnsbein
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1999-04

Review 3.  The neural basis of temporal processing.

Authors:  Michael D Mauk; Dean V Buonomano
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 12.449

4.  Localization of human supratemporal auditory areas from intracerebral auditory evoked potentials using distributed source models.

Authors:  Blaise Yvert; Catherine Fischer; Olivier Bertrand; Jacques Pernier
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-07-21       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Orienting attention to points in time improves stimulus processing both within and across modalities.

Authors:  Kathrin Lange; Brigitte Röder
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 6.  The representation of temporal information in perception and motor control.

Authors:  R B Ivry
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 6.627

7.  Shifting and focusing auditory spatial attention.

Authors:  T A Mondor; R J Zatorre
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 8.  Neural mechanisms of visual selective attention.

Authors:  G R Mangun
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 9.  Time, our lost dimension: toward a new theory of perception, attention, and memory.

Authors:  M R Jones
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Attention and the detection of signals.

Authors:  M I Posner; C R Snyder; B J Davidson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-06
View more
  31 in total

1.  Temporal attention facilitates short-term consolidation during a rapid serial auditory presentation task.

Authors:  Dawei Shen; Claude Alain
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Modulation of response patterns in human auditory cortex during a target detection task: an intracranial electrophysiology study.

Authors:  Kirill V Nourski; Mitchell Steinschneider; Hiroyuki Oya; Hiroto Kawasaki; Matthew A Howard
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 2.997

3.  Temporal Prediction in lieu of Periodic Stimulation.

Authors:  Benjamin Morillon; Charles E Schroeder; Valentin Wyart; Luc H Arnal
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Effects of auditory selective attention on neural phase: individual differences and short-term training.

Authors:  Aeron Laffere; Fred Dick; Adam Tierney
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Human evoked cortical activity to silent gaps in noise: effects of age, attention, and cortical processing speed.

Authors:  Kelly C Harris; Sara Wilson; Mark A Eckert; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Combining spatial and temporal expectations to improve visual perception.

Authors:  Gustavo Rohenkohl; Ian C Gould; Jéssica Pessoa; Anna C Nobre
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Temporal predictability enhances auditory detection.

Authors:  Emma L A Lawrance; Nicol S Harper; James E Cooke; Jan W H Schnupp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 8.  Predictive motor control of sensory dynamics in auditory active sensing.

Authors:  Benjamin Morillon; Troy A Hackett; Yoshinao Kajikawa; Charles E Schroeder
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 6.627

9.  Musical Meter Modulates the Allocation of Attention across Time.

Authors:  Ahren B Fitzroy; Lisa D Sanders
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  The ability to tap to a beat relates to cognitive, linguistic, and perceptual skills.

Authors:  Adam T Tierney; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2013-02-09       Impact factor: 2.381

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.