Literature DB >> 27605528

High-frequency neural activity predicts word parsing in ambiguous speech streams.

Anne Kösem1,2,3, Anahita Basirat4,5, Leila Azizi4, Virginie van Wassenhove4.   

Abstract

During speech listening, the brain parses a continuous acoustic stream of information into computational units (e.g., syllables or words) necessary for speech comprehension. Recent neuroscientific hypotheses have proposed that neural oscillations contribute to speech parsing, but whether they do so on the basis of acoustic cues (bottom-up acoustic parsing) or as a function of available linguistic representations (top-down linguistic parsing) is unknown. In this magnetoencephalography study, we contrasted acoustic and linguistic parsing using bistable speech sequences. While listening to the speech sequences, participants were asked to maintain one of the two possible speech percepts through volitional control. We predicted that the tracking of speech dynamics by neural oscillations would not only follow the acoustic properties but also shift in time according to the participant's conscious speech percept. Our results show that the latency of high-frequency activity (specifically, beta and gamma bands) varied as a function of the perceptual report. In contrast, the phase of low-frequency oscillations was not strongly affected by top-down control. Whereas changes in low-frequency neural oscillations were compatible with the encoding of prelexical segmentation cues, high-frequency activity specifically informed on an individual's conscious speech percept.
Copyright © 2016 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MEG; bistability; neural entrainment; phase; speech segmentation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27605528      PMCID: PMC5133297          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00074.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  96 in total

1.  Low-Frequency Cortical Entrainment to Speech Reflects Phoneme-Level Processing.

Authors:  Giovanni M Di Liberto; James A O'Sullivan; Edmund C Lalor
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Phase patterns of neuronal responses reliably discriminate speech in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Huan Luo; David Poeppel
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-06-21       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Early visual brain areas reflect the percept of an ambiguous scene.

Authors:  Lauri Parkkonen; Jesper Andersson; Matti Hämäläinen; Riitta Hari
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Tuning of the human neocortex to the temporal dynamics of attended events.

Authors:  Julien Besle; Catherine A Schevon; Ashesh D Mehta; Peter Lakatos; Robert R Goodman; Guy M McKhann; Ronald G Emerson; Charles E Schroeder
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Stimulus specificity of phase-locked and non-phase-locked 40 Hz visual responses in human.

Authors:  C Tallon-Baudry; O Bertrand; C Delpuech; J Pernier
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1996-07-01       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Oscillatory sensory selection mechanisms during intersensory attention to rhythmic auditory and visual inputs: a human electrocorticographic investigation.

Authors:  Manuel Gomez-Ramirez; Simon P Kelly; Sophie Molholm; Pejman Sehatpour; Theodore H Schwartz; John J Foxe
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Hearing an illusory vowel in noise: suppression of auditory cortical activity.

Authors:  Lars Riecke; Mieke Vanbussel; Lars Hausfeld; Deniz Başkent; Elia Formisano; Fabrizio Esposito
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  MNE software for processing MEG and EEG data.

Authors:  Alexandre Gramfort; Martin Luessi; Eric Larson; Denis A Engemann; Daniel Strohmeier; Christian Brodbeck; Lauri Parkkonen; Matti S Hämäläinen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Reconstructing speech from human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Brian N Pasley; Stephen V David; Nima Mesgarani; Adeen Flinker; Shihab A Shamma; Nathan E Crone; Robert T Knight; Edward F Chang
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Irregular Speech Rate Dissociates Auditory Cortical Entrainment, Evoked Responses, and Frontal Alpha.

Authors:  Stephanie J Kayser; Robin A A Ince; Joachim Gross; Christoph Kayser
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  9 in total

1.  Cortical encoding of acoustic and linguistic rhythms in spoken narratives.

Authors:  Cheng Luo; Nai Ding
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 8.140

2.  An oscillating computational model can track pseudo-rhythmic speech by using linguistic predictions.

Authors:  Sanne Ten Oever; Andrea E Martin
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  Speaking rhythmically can shape hearing.

Authors:  M Florencia Assaneo; Johanna M Rimmele; Yonatan Sanz Perl; David Poeppel
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2020-10-12

4.  Low-frequency neural activity reflects rule-based chunking during speech listening.

Authors:  Peiqing Jin; Yuhan Lu; Nai Ding
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  Combining predictive coding and neural oscillations enables online syllable recognition in natural speech.

Authors:  Sevada Hovsepyan; Itsaso Olasagasti; Anne-Lise Giraud
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Phase-amplitude coupling between theta and gamma oscillations adapts to speech rate.

Authors:  Mikel Lizarazu; Marie Lallier; Nicola Molinaro
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 5.691

7.  Multisensory correlation computations in the human brain identified by a time-resolved encoding model.

Authors:  Jacques Pesnot Lerousseau; Cesare V Parise; Marc O Ernst; Virginie van Wassenhove
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 17.694

8.  Human EEG and Recurrent Neural Networks Exhibit Common Temporal Dynamics During Speech Recognition.

Authors:  Saeedeh Hashemnia; Lukas Grasse; Shweta Soni; Matthew S Tata
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-08

9.  Listening to speech with a guinea pig-to-human brain-to-brain interface.

Authors:  Claus-Peter Richter; Petrina La Faire; Xiaodong Tan; Pamela Fiebig; David M Landsberger; Alan G Micco
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.