Literature DB >> 25506127

Language experience enhances early cortical pitch-dependent responses.

Ananthanarayan Krishnan1, Jackson T Gandour1, Saradha Ananthakrishnan1, Venkatakrishnan Vijayaraghavan2.   

Abstract

Pitch processing at cortical and subcortical stages of processing is shaped by language experience. We recently demonstrated that specific components of the cortical pitch response (CPR) index the more rapidly-changing portions of the high rising Tone 2 of Mandarin Chinese, in addition to marking pitch onset and sound offset. In this study, we examine how language experience (Mandarin vs. English) shapes the processing of different temporal attributes of pitch reflected in the CPR components using stimuli representative of within-category variants of Tone 2. Results showed that the magnitude of CPR components (Na-Pb and Pb-Nb) and the correlation between these two components and pitch acceleration were stronger for the Chinese listeners compared to English listeners for stimuli that fell within the range of Tone 2 citation forms. Discriminant function analysis revealed that the Na-Pb component was more than twice as important as Pb-Nb in grouping listeners by language affiliation. In addition, a stronger stimulus-dependent, rightward asymmetry was observed for the Chinese group at the temporal, but not frontal, electrode sites. This finding may reflect selective recruitment of experience-dependent, pitch-specific mechanisms in right auditory cortex to extract more complex, time-varying pitch patterns. Taken together, these findings suggest that long-term language experience shapes early sensory level processing of pitch in the auditory cortex, and that the sensitivity of the CPR may vary depending on the relative linguistic importance of specific temporal attributes of dynamic pitch.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cortical pitch response; experience-dependent plasticity; functional asymmetry; iterated rippled noise; pitch; tone language

Year:  2015        PMID: 25506127      PMCID: PMC4261237          DOI: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2014.08.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurolinguistics        ISSN: 0911-6044            Impact factor:   1.710


  98 in total

1.  Encoding of the temporal regularity of sound in the human brainstem.

Authors:  T D Griffiths; S Uppenkamp; I Johnsrude; O Josephs; R D Patterson
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Neuromagnetic evidence for a pitch processing center in Heschl's gyrus.

Authors:  K Krumbholz; R D Patterson; A Seither-Preisler; C Lammertmann; B Lütkenhöner
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Temporal integration of vowel periodicity in the auditory cortex.

Authors:  Santeri Yrttiaho; Hannu Tiitinen; Paavo Alku; Ismo Miettinen; Patrick J C May
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Reduction of information redundancy in the ascending auditory pathway.

Authors:  Gal Chechik; Michael J Anderson; Omer Bar-Yosef; Eric D Young; Naftali Tishby; Israel Nelken
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-08-03       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Applications of static and dynamic iterated rippled noise to evaluate pitch encoding in the human auditory brainstem.

Authors:  Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour; Yisheng Xu
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Discrimination of fundamental frequency contours in synthetic speech: implications for models of pitch perception.

Authors:  D H Klatt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Neural correlates of consonance, dissonance, and the hierarchy of musical pitch in the human brainstem.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Ananthanarayan Krishnan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Evidence of pitch processing in the N100m component of the auditory evoked field.

Authors:  Annemarie Seither-Preisler; Roy Patterson; Katrin Krumbholz; Stefan Seither; Bernd Lütkenhöner
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 9.  Cortical encoding of pitch: recent results and open questions.

Authors:  Kerry M M Walker; Jennifer K Bizley; Andrew J King; Jan W H Schnupp
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Cortical dynamics of acoustic and phonological processing in speech perception.

Authors:  Linjun Zhang; Jie Xi; Guoqing Xu; Hua Shu; Xiaoyi Wang; Ping Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  11 in total

1.  LANGUAGE EXPERIENCE SHAPES PROCESSING OF PITCH RELEVANT INFORMATION IN THE HUMAN BRAINSTEM AND AUDITORY CORTEX: ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL EVIDENCE.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Acoust Aust       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.500

2.  Language-dependent changes in pitch-relevant neural activity in the auditory cortex reflect differential weighting of temporal attributes of pitch contours.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour; Yi Xu; Chandan H Suresh
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 1.710

3.  Language-experience plasticity in neural representation of changes in pitch salience.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour; Chandan H Suresh
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2016-02-20       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Tone language experience-dependent advantage in pitch representation in brainstem and auditory cortex is maintained under reverberation.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Chandan H Suresh; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Pitch processing of dynamic lexical tones in the auditory cortex is influenced by sensory and extrasensory processes.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour; Chandan H Suresh
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 3.386

6.  Language experience-dependent advantage in pitch representation in the auditory cortex is limited to favorable signal-to-noise ratios.

Authors:  Chandan H Suresh; Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Changes in pitch height elicit both language-universal and language-dependent changes in neural representation of pitch in the brainstem and auditory cortex.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Chandan H Suresh; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 3.590

8.  Experience-dependent enhancement of pitch-specific responses in the auditory cortex is limited to acceleration rates in normal voice range.

Authors:  A Krishnan; J T Gandour; C H Suresh
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 3.590

9.  Differential sensitivity to changes in pitch acceleration in the auditory brainstem and cortex.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Chandan H Suresh; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 2.381

10.  Cortical pitch response components show differential sensitivity to native and nonnative pitch contours.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour; Chandan H Suresh
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 2.381

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.