Literature DB >> 25838636

LANGUAGE EXPERIENCE SHAPES PROCESSING OF PITCH RELEVANT INFORMATION IN THE HUMAN BRAINSTEM AND AUDITORY CORTEX: ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL EVIDENCE.

Ananthanarayan Krishnan1, Jackson T Gandour1.   

Abstract

Pitch is a robust perceptual attribute that plays an important role in speech, language, and music. As such, it provides an analytic window to evaluate how neural activity relevant to pitch undergo transformation from early sensory to later cognitive stages of processing in a well coordinated hierarchical network that is subject to experience-dependent plasticity. We review recent evidence of language experience-dependent effects in pitch processing based on comparisons of native vs. nonnative speakers of a tonal language from electrophysiological recordings in the auditory brainstem and auditory cortex. We present evidence that shows enhanced representation of linguistically-relevant pitch dimensions or features at both the brainstem and cortical levels with a stimulus-dependent preferential activation of the right hemisphere in native speakers of a tone language. We argue that neural representation of pitch-relevant information in the brainstem and early sensory level processing in the auditory cortex is shaped by the perceptual salience of domain-specific features. While both stages of processing are shaped by language experience, neural representations are transformed and fundamentally different at each biological level of abstraction. The representation of pitch relevant information in the brainstem is more fine-grained spectrotemporally as it reflects sustained neural phase-locking to pitch relevant periodicities contained in the stimulus. In contrast, the cortical pitch relevant neural activity reflects primarily a series of transient temporal neural events synchronized to certain temporal attributes of the pitch contour. We argue that experience-dependent enhancement of pitch representation for Chinese listeners most likely reflects an interaction between higher-level cognitive processes and early sensory-level processing to improve representations of behaviorally-relevant features that contribute optimally to perception. It is our view that long-term experience shapes this adaptive process wherein the top-down connections provide selective gating of inputs to both cortical and subcortical structures to enhance neural responses to specific behaviorally-relevant attributes of the stimulus. A theoretical framework for a neural network is proposed involving coordination between local, feedforward, and feedback components that can account for experience-dependent enhancement of pitch representations at multiple levels of the auditory pathway. The ability to record brainstem and cortical pitch relevant responses concurrently may provide a new window to evaluate the online interplay between feedback, feedforward, and local intrinsic components in the hierarchical processing of pitch relevant information.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 25838636      PMCID: PMC4380086     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acoust Aust        ISSN: 0814-6039            Impact factor:   1.500


  85 in total

1.  Encoding of the temporal regularity of sound in the human brainstem.

Authors:  T D Griffiths; S Uppenkamp; I Johnsrude; O Josephs; R D Patterson
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Neuromagnetic evidence for a pitch processing center in Heschl's gyrus.

Authors:  K Krumbholz; R D Patterson; A Seither-Preisler; C Lammertmann; B Lütkenhöner
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Musicians and tone-language speakers share enhanced brainstem encoding but not perceptual benefits for musical pitch.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Jackson T Gandour; Ananthanarayan Krishnan
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 2.310

4.  Reduction of information redundancy in the ascending auditory pathway.

Authors:  Gal Chechik; Michael J Anderson; Omer Bar-Yosef; Eric D Young; Naftali Tishby; Israel Nelken
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-08-03       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Neural encoding in the human brainstem relevant to the pitch of complex tones.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Neural correlates of consonance, dissonance, and the hierarchy of musical pitch in the human brainstem.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Ananthanarayan Krishnan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Experience-dependent neural representation of dynamic pitch in the brainstem.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour; Gavin M Bidelman; Jayaganesh Swaminathan
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 1.837

8.  Evidence of pitch processing in the N100m component of the auditory evoked field.

Authors:  Annemarie Seither-Preisler; Roy Patterson; Katrin Krumbholz; Stefan Seither; Bernd Lütkenhöner
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 9.  Cortical encoding of pitch: recent results and open questions.

Authors:  Kerry M M Walker; Jennifer K Bizley; Andrew J King; Jan W H Schnupp
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Auditory frequency and intensity discrimination explained using a cortical population rate code.

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; Paul R Schrater; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  11 in total

1.  Language-dependent changes in pitch-relevant neural activity in the auditory cortex reflect differential weighting of temporal attributes of pitch contours.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour; Yi Xu; Chandan H Suresh
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 1.710

2.  Language-experience plasticity in neural representation of changes in pitch salience.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour; Chandan H Suresh
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2016-02-20       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Tone language experience-dependent advantage in pitch representation in brainstem and auditory cortex is maintained under reverberation.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Chandan H Suresh; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Language experience-dependent advantage in pitch representation in the auditory cortex is limited to favorable signal-to-noise ratios.

Authors:  Chandan H Suresh; Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Changes in pitch height elicit both language-universal and language-dependent changes in neural representation of pitch in the brainstem and auditory cortex.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Chandan H Suresh; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 3.590

6.  Cellular distribution of the fragile X mental retardation protein in the mouse brain.

Authors:  Diego A R Zorio; Christine M Jackson; Yong Liu; Edwin W Rubel; Yuan Wang
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 3.215

7.  Experience-dependent enhancement of pitch-specific responses in the auditory cortex is limited to acceleration rates in normal voice range.

Authors:  A Krishnan; J T Gandour; C H Suresh
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 3.590

8.  Differential sensitivity to changes in pitch acceleration in the auditory brainstem and cortex.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Chandan H Suresh; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 2.381

9.  Brief Report: Discrimination of Foreign Speech Pitch and Autistic Traits in Non-Clinical Population.

Authors:  Lai-Sang Iao; Anna Wippich; Yu Hin Lam
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2018-01

10.  Cortical hemisphere preference and brainstem ear asymmetry reflect experience-dependent functional modulation of pitch.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Chandan H Suresh; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 2.781

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.