Literature DB >> 25486387

Effective dose of cone beam CT (CBCT) of the facial skeleton: a systematic review.

A Al-Okshi1, C Lindh, H Salé, M Gunnarsson, M Rohlin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate effective dose of cone beam CT (CBCT) of the facial skeleton with focus on measurement methods and scanning protocols.
METHODS: A systematic review, which adhered to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews (PRISMA) Statement, of the literature up to April 2014 was conducted. Data sources included MEDLINE®, The Cochrane Library and Web of Science. A model was developed to underpin data extraction from 38 included studies.
RESULTS: Technical specifications of the CBCT units were insufficiently described. Heterogeneity in measurement methods and scanning protocols between studies made comparisons of effective doses of different CBCT units and scanning protocols difficult. Few studies related doses to image quality. Reported effective dose varied across studies, ranging between 9.7 and 197.0 μSv for field of views (FOVs) with height ≤5 cm, between 3.9 and 674.0 μSv for FOVs of heights 5.1-10.0 cm and between 8.8 and 1073.0 μSv for FOVs >10 cm. There was an inconsistency regarding reported effective dose of studies of the same CBCT unit with the same FOV dimensions.
CONCLUSION: The review reveals a need for studies on radiation dosages related to image quality. Reporting quality of future studies has to be improved to facilitate comparison of effective doses obtained from examinations with different CBCT units and scanning protocols. A model with minimum data set on important parameters based on this observation is proposed. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Data important when estimating effective dose were insufficiently reported in most studies. A model with minimum data based on this observation is proposed. Few studies related effective dose to image quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25486387      PMCID: PMC4277388          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20140658

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  48 in total

1.  The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2007

2.  Effective dose from cone beam CT examinations in dentistry.

Authors:  J A Roberts; N A Drage; J Davies; D W Thomas
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2008-10-13       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Cone beam CT: a current overview of devices.

Authors:  A Nemtoi; C Czink; D Haba; A Gahleitner
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Radiochromic films for dental CT dosimetry: a feasibility study.

Authors:  O Rampado; S D Bianchi; A Peruzzo Cornetto; V Rossetti; R Ropolo
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2012-06-30       Impact factor: 2.685

5.  Influence of CBCT exposure conditions on radiation dose.

Authors:  J Martin Palomo; Pejavar S Rao; Mark G Hans
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2008-04-18

6.  Comparative study of jaws with multislice computed tomography and cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  G Carrafiello; M Dizonno; V Colli; S Strocchi; S Pozzi Taubert; A Leonardi; A Giorgianni; M Barresi; A Macchi; E Bracchi; L Conte; C Fugazzola
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 3.469

7.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Alessandro Liberati; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 6.071

8.  Small field of view cone beam CT temporomandibular joint imaging dosimetry.

Authors:  T D Lukat; J C M Wong; E W N Lam
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 2.419

9.  Clinical application of cone beam digital volume tomography in children with cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  R Wörtche; S Hassfeld; C J Lux; E Müssig; F W Hensley; R Krempien; C Hofele
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.419

10.  Comparison of effective dose for imaging of mandible between multi-detector CT and cone-beam CT.

Authors:  Dae-Kyo Jeong; Sang-Chul Lee; Kyung-Hoe Huh; Won-Jin Yi; Min-Suk Heo; Sam-Sun Lee; Soon-Chul Choi
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2012-06-25
View more
  21 in total

1.  Minimum size and positioning of imaging field for CBCT scans of impacted maxillary canines.

Authors:  Elmira Pakbaznejad Esmaeili; Anne-Mari Ilo; Janna Waltimo-Sirén; Marja Ekholm
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Economic and health implications of routine CBCT examination before surgical removal of the mandibular third molar in the Danish population.

Authors:  L B Petersen; K R Olsen; L H Matzen; M Vaeth; A Wenzel
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Dose optimization for assessment of periodontal structures in cone beam CT examinations.

Authors:  Ayman Al-Okshi; Chrysoula Theodorakou; Christina Lindh
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 4.  Radiation dose in non-dental cone beam CT applications: a systematic review.

Authors:  Cosimo Nardi; Sergio Salerno; Roberto Molteni; Mariaelena Occhipinti; Giulia Grazzini; Niccolò Norberti; Cesare Cordopatri; Stefano Colagrande
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 3.469

5.  Computer-aided cephalometric landmark annotation for CBCT data.

Authors:  Marina Codari; Matteo Caffini; Gianluca M Tartaglia; Chiarella Sforza; Giuseppe Baselli
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 6.  Precision of cone beam CT to assess periodontal bone defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Letícia Fernanda Haas; Glaucia Santos Zimmermann; G De Luca Canto; Carlos Flores-Mir; Márcio Corrêa
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 2.419

7.  [Guideline for "rhinosinusitis"-long version : S2k guideline of the German College of General Practitioners and Family Physicians and the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery].

Authors:  B A Stuck; A Beule; D Jobst; L Klimek; M Laudien; M Lell; T J Vogl; U Popert
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.284

8.  Re-exposure in cone beam CT of the dentomaxillofacial region: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Yasamin Habibi; Edriss Habibi; Bilal Al-Nawas
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 2.419

9.  Measurability and reliability of assessments of root length and marginal bone level in cone beam CT and intraoral radiography: a study of adolescents.

Authors:  Ayman Al-Okshi; Liselotte Paulsson; Madeleine Rohlin; Eman Ebrahim; Christina Lindh
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 10.  Non-surgical correction of gummy smile using temporary skeletal mini-screw anchorage devices: A systematic review.

Authors:  Deema Alshammery; Nasser Alqhtani; Asmaa Alajmi; Lamis Dagriri; Nouf Alrukban; Rahaf Alshahrani; Shahad Alghamdi
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2021-07-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.