Literature DB >> 30794436

Measurability and reliability of assessments of root length and marginal bone level in cone beam CT and intraoral radiography: a study of adolescents.

Ayman Al-Okshi1,2, Liselotte Paulsson1, Madeleine Rohlin1, Eman Ebrahim1,3, Christina Lindh1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate measurability and reliability of measurements of root length and marginal bone level in CBCT, periapical (PA) and bitewing (BW) radiographs.
METHODS: CBCT of both jaws, PA of maxillary incisors and posterior BW radiographs of 10 adolescents (mean age 13.4) were selected. The radiographs comprised part of the baseline examinations of a trial of orthodontic treatment. Six raters assessed measurability and measured root length and marginal bone level. Three raters repeated their assessments. Measurability was expressed as frequency of interpretable sites and reliability as intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).
RESULTS: Measurability was 100 % in CBCT and 95 % in PA of maxillary incisors for root length measurements. For marginal bone level, measurability was 100 % in CBCT, 76 % in PA and 86 % in posterior BW. Mean ICC for interrater reliability for root length measurements in CBCT was 0.88 (range 0.27-0.96 among different teeth) and 0.69 in PA of maxillary incisors. For marginal bone level measurements, mean ICC was 0.4 in CBCT, 0.38 in PA of maxillary incisors and 0.4 in posterior BW. Intrarater reliability varied among methods, root length or marginal bone level and among raters, except for root length measurements in CBCT, which presented high reliability (above 0.8) for all raters.
CONCLUSIONS: As measurability and reliability were high for root length measurements in CBCT, this may be the method of choice for scientific analyses in orthodontics. For clinical praxis, we recommend PA following the "as low as diagnostically acceptable" principle, as clinical decisions seem to be influenced only when severe root resorption occurs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cone-beam computed tomography; humans; orthodontics; radiography, dental; reproducibility of results

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30794436      PMCID: PMC6747423          DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20180368

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol        ISSN: 0250-832X            Impact factor:   2.419


  21 in total

1.  The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration.

Authors:  Patrick M Bossuyt; Johannes B Reitsma; David E Bruns; Constantine A Gatsonis; Paul P Glasziou; Les M Irwig; David Moher; Drummond Rennie; Henrica C W de Vet; Jeroen G Lijmer
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 8.327

2.  Accuracy and reliability of tooth and root lengths measured on cone-beam computed tomographs.

Authors:  John F Sherrard; P Emile Rossouw; Byron W Benson; Roberto Carrillo; Peter H Buschang
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  Assessment of display performance for medical imaging systems: executive summary of AAPM TG18 report.

Authors:  Ehsan Samei; Aldo Badano; Dev Chakraborty; Ken Compton; Craig Cornelius; Kevin Corrigan; Michael J Flynn; Bradley Hemminger; Nick Hangiandreou; Jeffrey Johnson; Donna M Moxley-Stevens; William Pavlicek; Hans Roehrig; Lois Rutz; Jeffrey Shepard; Robert A Uzenoff; Jihong Wang; Charles E Willis
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  The efficacy of diagnostic imaging.

Authors:  D G Fryback; J R Thornbury
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1991 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.583

5.  Observer performance based on marginal bone tissue visibility in Scanora panoramic radiography and posterior bitewing radiography.

Authors:  Deimante Ivanauskaite; Christina Lindh; Madeleine Rohlin
Journal:  Stomatologija       Date:  2008

Review 6.  Root resorption associated with orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic review.

Authors:  Belinda Weltman; Katherine W L Vig; Henry W Fields; Shiva Shanker; Eloise E Kaizar
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.650

Review 7.  Root resorption caused by orthodontic treatment: an evidence-based review of literature.

Authors:  D M Killiany
Journal:  Semin Orthod       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 0.970

8.  Comparison between panoramic and intra-oral radiographs for the assessment of alveolar bone levels in a periodontal maintenance population.

Authors:  Rigmor E Persson; Sappho Tzannetou; Andreas G Feloutzis; Urs Brägger; G Rutger Persson; Niklaus P Lang
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 8.728

9.  Cone beam computed tomography for assessment of root length and marginal bone level during orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  Henrik Lund; Kerstin Gröndahl; Hans-Göran Gröndahl
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews.

Authors:  Penny Whiting; Anne W S Rutjes; Johannes B Reitsma; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Jos Kleijnen
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2003-11-10       Impact factor: 4.615

View more
  3 in total

1.  Ex-vivo imaging of buccal and oral periodontal bone with low-dose CBCT in porcine jaws.

Authors:  Maurice Ruetters; Holger Gehrig; Dorohtea Kronsteiner; Vanessa Weyer; Ti-Sun Kim; Christopher J Lux; Sinan Sen
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  A pilot study of a deep learning approach to detect marginal bone loss around implants.

Authors:  Min Liu; Shimin Wang; Hu Chen; Yunsong Liu
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2022-01-16       Impact factor: 2.757

3.  Imaging furcation defects with low-dose cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Maurice Ruetters; Holger Gehrig; Ti-Sun Kim; Valentin Bartha; Thomas Bruckner; Franz Sebastian Schwindling; Anna Felten; Christopher Lux; Sinan Sen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 4.996

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.