Literature DB >> 34306536

Non-surgical correction of gummy smile using temporary skeletal mini-screw anchorage devices: A systematic review.

Deema Alshammery1, Nasser Alqhtani2, Asmaa Alajmi3, Lamis Dagriri3, Nouf Alrukban3, Rahaf Alshahrani3, Shahad Alghamdi3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are no studies that have systematically reviewed randomized control trials and/or prospective cohort studies that have assessed the significance of temporary skeletal mini-screw anchorage devices (TSAD) for the correction of gummy-smile. The aim of the present systematic review was to assess the significance of non-surgical correction of gummy smile using TSAD.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The addressed focused question was "Are temporary skeletal mini-screw anchorage devices effective for the correction of gummy smile?" Indexed databases were searched up to and including May 2020. Different combinations of the following key-indexing terms were used: anchorage; gummy smile, mini-screw; orthodontic; and vertical maxillary excess. The literature search was performed without time and language barriers. Randomized clinical trials and prospective cohort studies that addressed the focused questions were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Downs and Black and Cochran collaboration tools. Letters to the Editor, commentaries, case-reports/series and articles published in non-indexed databases were excluded.
RESULTS: The initial search yielded 2118 studies out of which, four studies met the inclusion criteria and were processed for data extraction. All studies had a prospective research design. One study was a clinical trial and 3 had a non-randomized design. Results of the clinical trial showed no statistically significant difference in the extent of intrusion between the test- and control-groups. The non-randomized studies showed that TSAD are useful in reducing deep overbite. All studies had a high risk of bias.
CONCLUSIONS: The TSAD are an effective and practical option in facilitating reduction of excessive gingival display or gummy-smile. However, further long-term follow-up, well-designed and power-adjusted clinical trials are warranted in this regard. Key words:Anchorage, Excessive gingival display, Gummy-smile, Mini-screw. Copyright:
© 2021 Medicina Oral S.L.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34306536      PMCID: PMC8291159          DOI: 10.4317/jced.58242

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent        ISSN: 1989-5488


  35 in total

1.  Radiation dose of cone-beam computed tomography compared to conventional radiographs in orthodontics.

Authors:  Luca Signorelli; Raphael Patcas; Timo Peltomäki; Marc Schätzle
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Miniscrews for upper incisor intrusion.

Authors:  Omur Polat-Ozsoy; Ayca Arman-Ozcirpici; Firdevs Veziroglu
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2009-03-16       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  Gummy Smile and Short Tooth Syndrome--Part 1: Etiopathogenesis, Classification, and Diagnostic Guidelines.

Authors:  Antonello F Pavone; Marjan Ghassemian; Simone Verardi
Journal:  Compend Contin Educ Dent       Date:  2016-02

4.  Modification of LeFort I osteotomy for severe maxillary vertical excess asymmetry.

Authors:  Venkatesh Anehosur; Abhijit Joshi; Jayesh Nathani; Amal Suresh
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2019-04-13       Impact factor: 1.651

Review 5.  Lack of blinding of outcome assessors in animal model experiments implies risk of observer bias.

Authors:  Segun Bello; Lasse T Krogsbøll; Jan Gruber; Zhizhuang J Zhao; Doris Fischer; Asbjørn Hróbjartsson
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 6.  Maxillary orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  Richard E Bauer; Mark W Ochs
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 2.802

7.  Intrusion of maxillary incisors by mini-screw anchorage of Angle Class II division 2 malocclusion cases.

Authors:  Bilal A Al-Falahi; Shaza M Hammad; Mohammed H El-Kenawy; Maher A Fouda
Journal:  Int J Orthod Milwaukee       Date:  2012

8.  Nonextraction treatment with temporary skeletal anchorage devices to correct a Class II Division 2 malocclusion with excessive gingival display.

Authors:  Makoto Nishimura; Minayo Sannohe; Hiroshi Nagasaka; Kaoru Igarashi; Junji Sugawara
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.650

9.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Alessandro Liberati; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 11.069

10.  Digital orthodontic radiographic set versus cone-beam computed tomography: an evaluation of the effective dose.

Authors:  Lillian Atsumi Simabuguro Chinem; Beatriz de Souza Vilella; Cláudia Lúcia de Pinho Maurício; Lucia Viviana Canevaro; Luiz Fernando Deluiz; Oswaldo de Vasconcellos Vilella
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug
View more
  1 in total

1.  Dynamics, Efficacies, and Adverse Effects of Maxillary Full-Arch Intrusion Using Temporary Anchorage Devices (Miniscrews): A Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Marzieh Mazhari; Mashallah Khanehmasjedi; Mohsen Mazhary; Nastaran Atashkar; Vahid Rakhshan
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 3.246

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.