Literature DB >> 24048693

Small field of view cone beam CT temporomandibular joint imaging dosimetry.

T D Lukat1, J C M Wong, E W N Lam.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Cone beam CT (CBCT) is generally accepted as the imaging modality of choice for visualisation of the osseous structures of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ). The purpose of this study was to compare the radiation dose of a protocol for CBCT TMJ imaging using a large field of view Hitachi CB MercuRay™ unit (Hitachi Medical Systems, Tokyo, Japan) with an alternative approach that utilizes two CBCT acquisitions of the right and left TMJs using the Kodak 9000(®) 3D system (Carestream, Rochester, NY).
METHODS: 25 optically stimulated luminescence dosemeters were placed in various locations of an anthropomorphic RANDO(®) Man phantom (Alderson Research Laboratories, Stanford, CT). Dosimetric measurements were performed for each technique, and effective doses were calculated using the 2007 International Commission on Radiological Protection tissue weighting factor recommendations for all protocols.
RESULTS: The radiation effective dose for the CB MercuRay technique was 223.6 ± 1.1 μSv compared with 9.7 ± 0.1 μSv (child), 13.5 ± 0.9 μSv (adolescent/small adult) and 20.5 ± 1.3 μSv (adult) for the bilateral Kodak acquisitions.
CONCLUSIONS: Acquisitions of individual right and left TMJ volumes using the Kodak 9000 3D CBCT imaging system resulted in a more than ten-fold reduction in the effective dose compared with the larger single field acquisition with the Hitachi CB MercuRay. This decrease is made even more significant when lower tube potential and tube current settings are used.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cone beam computed tomography; radiation dosimetry; temporomandibular joint

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24048693      PMCID: PMC3853513          DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20130082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol        ISSN: 0250-832X            Impact factor:   2.419


  16 in total

1.  A simple method of assessing the temporomandibular joint with helical computer tomography: technical note.

Authors:  K Wong; B B Forster; D K Li; J E Aldrich
Journal:  Can Assoc Radiol J       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.248

2.  Current adult and pediatric CT doses.

Authors:  Edward Nickoloff
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2002-03-07

Review 3.  Application of cone beam computed tomography for assessment of the temporomandibular joints.

Authors:  S Barghan; S Tetradis; Sm Mallya
Journal:  Aust Dent J       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.291

4.  Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB Mercuray, NewTom 3G and i-CAT.

Authors:  J B Ludlow; L E Davies-Ludlow; S L Brooks; W B Howerton
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  Osseous abnormalities of the mandibular condyle: diagnostic reliability of cone beam computed tomography compared with helical computed tomography based on an autopsy material.

Authors:  K Honda; T A Larheim; K Maruhashi; K Matsumoto; K Iwai
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2007

7.  Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology.

Authors:  John B Ludlow; Marija Ivanovic
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2008-05-27

8.  Age-specific effective doses for pediatric MSCT examinations at a large children's hospital using DLP conversion coefficients: a simple estimation method.

Authors:  Karen E Thomas; Bo Wang
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2008-04-08

9.  CT and MR of the temporomandibular joint: comparison with autopsy specimens.

Authors:  P L Westesson; R W Katzberg; R H Tallents; R E Sanchez-Woodworth; S A Svensson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 10.  Current trends in temporomandibular joint imaging.

Authors:  T A Larheim
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  1995-11
View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Effective dose of cone beam CT (CBCT) of the facial skeleton: a systematic review.

Authors:  A Al-Okshi; C Lindh; H Salé; M Gunnarsson; M Rohlin
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Evaluation of the effective dose of cone beam CT and multislice CT for temporomandibular joint examinations at optimized exposure levels.

Authors:  N Kadesjö; D Benchimol; B Falahat; K Näsström; X-Q Shi
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Evaluation of the diagnostic efficacy of two cone beam computed tomography protocols in reliably detecting the location of the inferior alveolar nerve canal.

Authors:  Aditya Tadinada; Sydney Schneider; Sumit Yadav
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Effective radiation dose and eye lens dose in dental cone beam CT: effect of field of view and angle of rotation.

Authors:  R Pauwels; G Zhang; C Theodorakou; A Walker; H Bosmans; R Jacobs; R Bogaerts; K Horner
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 5.  Effective dose of dental CBCT-a meta analysis of published data and additional data for nine CBCT units.

Authors:  J B Ludlow; R Timothy; C Walker; R Hunter; E Benavides; D B Samuelson; M J Scheske
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 6.  A meta-review of effective doses in dental and maxillofacial cone beam CT using the ROBIS tool.

Authors:  Ayman Al-Okshi; Keith Horner; Madeleine Rohlin
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 3.629

7.  Radiographic interpretation using high-resolution Cbct to diagnose degenerative temporomandibular joint disease.

Authors:  Jonas Bianchi; João Roberto Gonçalves; Antônio Carlos de Oliveira Ruellas; Júlia Vieira Pastana Bianchi; Lawrence M Ashman; Marilia Yatabe; Erika Benavides; Fabiana Naomi Soki; Lucia Helena Soares Cevidanes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Assessment of Random Error in Phantom Dosimetry with the Use of Error Simulation in Statistical Software.

Authors:  R C Hoogeveen; E P Martens; P F van der Stelt; W E R Berkhout
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-12-31       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Usefulness of measuring bone density of mandibular condyle in patients at risk of osteoporosis: A cone beam computed tomography study.

Authors:  Mustafa Alkhader; Ammar Aldawoodyeh; Nour Abdo
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.