PURPOSE: To describe a model-based reconstruction strategy for routine magnetic resonance imaging that accounts for gradient nonlinearity (GNL) during rather than after transformation to the image domain, and demonstrate that this approach reduces the spatial resolution loss that occurs during strictly image-domain GNL-correction. METHODS: After reviewing conventional GNL-correction methods, we propose a generic signal model for GNL-affected magnetic resonance imaging acquisitions, discuss how it incorporates into contemporary image reconstruction platforms, and describe efficient nonuniform fast Fourier transform-based computational routines for these. The impact of GNL-correction on spatial resolution by the conventional and proposed approaches is investigated on phantom data acquired at varying offsets from gradient isocenter, as well as on fully sampled and (retrospectively) undersampled in vivo acquisitions. RESULTS: Phantom results demonstrate that resolution loss that occurs during GNL-correction is significantly less for the proposed strategy than for the standard approach at distances >10 cm from isocenter with a 35 cm field-of-view gradient coil. The in vivo results suggest that the proposed strategy better preserves fine anatomical detail than retrospective GNL-correction while offering comparable geometric correction. CONCLUSION: Accounting for GNL during image reconstruction allows geometric distortion to be corrected with less spatial resolution loss than is typically observed with the conventional image domain correction strategy.
PURPOSE: To describe a model-based reconstruction strategy for routine magnetic resonance imaging that accounts for gradient nonlinearity (GNL) during rather than after transformation to the image domain, and demonstrate that this approach reduces the spatial resolution loss that occurs during strictly image-domain GNL-correction. METHODS: After reviewing conventional GNL-correction methods, we propose a generic signal model for GNL-affected magnetic resonance imaging acquisitions, discuss how it incorporates into contemporary image reconstruction platforms, and describe efficient nonuniform fast Fourier transform-based computational routines for these. The impact of GNL-correction on spatial resolution by the conventional and proposed approaches is investigated on phantom data acquired at varying offsets from gradient isocenter, as well as on fully sampled and (retrospectively) undersampled in vivo acquisitions. RESULTS: Phantom results demonstrate that resolution loss that occurs during GNL-correction is significantly less for the proposed strategy than for the standard approach at distances >10 cm from isocenter with a 35 cm field-of-view gradient coil. The in vivo results suggest that the proposed strategy better preserves fine anatomical detail than retrospective GNL-correction while offering comparable geometric correction. CONCLUSION: Accounting for GNL during image reconstruction allows geometric distortion to be corrected with less spatial resolution loss than is typically observed with the conventional image domain correction strategy.
Authors: Scott B Reeder; Angel R Pineda; Zhifei Wen; Ann Shimakawa; Huanzhou Yu; Jean H Brittain; Garry E Gold; Christopher H Beaulieu; Norbert J Pelc Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Joshua D Trzasko; Zhonghao Bao; Armando Manduca; Kiaran P McGee; Matt A Bernstein Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2011-08-25 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Martin Uecker; Peng Lai; Mark J Murphy; Patrick Virtue; Michael Elad; John M Pauly; Shreyas S Vasanawala; Michael Lustig Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Shengzhen Tao; Joshua D Trzasko; Yunhong Shu; John Huston; Kevin M Johnson; Paul T Weavers; Erin M Gray; Matt A Bernstein Journal: Med Phys Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Uten Yarach; Chaiya Luengviriya; Daniel Stucht; Frank Godenschweger; Peter Schulze; Oliver Speck Journal: MAGMA Date: 2016-02-09 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: Paul T Weavers; Shengzhen Tao; Joshua D Trzasko; Louis M Frigo; Yunhong Shu; Matthew A Frick; Seung-Kyun Lee; Thomas K-F Foo; Matt A Bernstein Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2017-06-21 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Shengzhen Tao; Joshua D Trzasko; Yunhong Shu; Paul T Weavers; John Huston; Erin M Gray; Matt A Bernstein Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2015-07-17 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Ek T Tan; Seung-Kyun Lee; Paul T Weavers; Dominic Graziani; Joseph E Piel; Yunhong Shu; John Huston; Matt A Bernstein; Thomas K F Foo Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2016-02-26 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Myung-Ho In; Ek Tsoon Tan; Joshua D Trzasko; Yunhong Shu; Daehun Kang; Uten Yarach; Shengzhen Tao; Erin M Gray; John Huston; Matt A Bernstein Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2019-05-20 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Paul T Weavers; Yunhong Shu; Shengzhen Tao; John Huston; Seung-Kyun Lee; Dominic Graziani; Jean-Baptiste Mathieu; Joshua D Trzasko; Thomas K-F Foo; Matt A Bernstein Journal: Med Phys Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 4.071