Literature DB >> 16092103

Iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation (IDEAL): application with fast spin-echo imaging.

Scott B Reeder1, Angel R Pineda, Zhifei Wen, Ann Shimakawa, Huanzhou Yu, Jean H Brittain, Garry E Gold, Christopher H Beaulieu, Norbert J Pelc.   

Abstract

Chemical shift based methods are often used to achieve uniform water-fat separation that is insensitive to Bo inhomogeneities. Many spin-echo (SE) or fast SE (FSE) approaches acquire three echoes shifted symmetrically about the SE, creating time-dependent phase shifts caused by water-fat chemical shift. This work demonstrates that symmetrically acquired echoes cause artifacts that degrade image quality. According to theory, the noise performance of any water-fat separation method is dependent on the proportion of water and fat within a voxel, and the position of echoes relative to the SE. To address this problem, we propose a method termed "iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetric and least-squares estimation" (IDEAL). This technique combines asymmetrically acquired echoes with an iterative least-squares decomposition algorithm to maximize noise performance. Theoretical calculations predict that the optimal echo combination occurs when the relative phase of the echoes is separated by 2pi/3, with the middle echo centered at pi/2+pik (k=any integer), i.e., (-pi/6+pik, pi/2+pik, 7pi/6+pik). Only with these echo combinations can noise performance reach the maximum possible and be independent of the proportion of water and fat. Close agreement between theoretical and experimental results obtained from an oil-water phantom was observed, demonstrating that the iterative least-squares decomposition method is an efficient estimator. Copyright (c) 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16092103     DOI: 10.1002/mrm.20624

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  236 in total

Review 1.  Advancing imaging technologies for patients with spinal pain: with a focus on whiplash injury.

Authors:  James M Elliott; Mark J Hancock; Rebecca J Crawford; Andrew C Smith; David M Walton
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 4.166

2.  Removal of cerebrospinal fluid partial volume effects in quantitative magnetization transfer imaging using a three-pool model with nonexchanging water component.

Authors:  Pouria Mossahebi; Andrew L Alexander; Aaron S Field; Alexey A Samsonov
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 3.  Quantitative Assessment of Liver Fat with Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Spectroscopy.

Authors:  Scott B Reeder; Irene Cruite; Gavin Hamilton; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 4.  Quantification of liver fat with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Scott B Reeder; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.266

5.  Ramped hybrid encoding for improved ultrashort echo time imaging.

Authors:  Hyungseok Jang; Curtis N Wiens; Alan B McMillan
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Thermogenic profiling using magnetic resonance imaging of dermal and other adipose tissues.

Authors:  Ildiko Kasza; Diego Hernando; Alejandro Roldán-Alzate; Caroline M Alexander; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2016-08-18

7.  Age-related differences in diffusion tensor indices and fiber architecture in the medial and lateral gastrocnemius.

Authors:  Usha Sinha; Robert Csapo; Vadim Malis; Yanjie Xue; Shantanu Sinha
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Automated unsupervised multi-parametric classification of adipose tissue depots in skeletal muscle.

Authors:  Alexander Valentinitsch; Dimitrios C Karampinos; Hamza Alizai; Karupppasamy Subburaj; Deepak Kumar; Thomas M Link; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 9.  Measurement of liver fat fraction and iron with MRI and MR spectroscopy techniques.

Authors:  Puneet Sharma; Maria Altbach; Jean-Philippe Galons; Bobby Kalb; Diego R Martin
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.630

10.  Assessment of liver fat in an obese patient population using noncontrast CT fat percent index.

Authors:  Ali F Jon; Ahmad R Cheema; Atif N Khan; Vassilios Raptopoulos; Thomas Hauser; Imad Nasser; Francine K Welty; Andrew Karellas; Melvin E Clouse
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 1.605

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.