Literature DB >> 17388155

Characterization, prediction, and correction of geometric distortion in 3 T MR images.

Lesley N Baldwin1, Keith Wachowicz, Steven D Thomas, Ryan Rivest, B Gino Fallone.   

Abstract

The work presented herein describes our methods and results for predicting, measuring and correcting geometric distortions in a 3 T clinical magnetic resonance (MR) scanner for the purpose of image guidance in radiation treatment planning. Geometric inaccuracies due to both inhomogeneities in the background field and nonlinearities in the applied gradients were easily visualized on the MR images of a regularly structured three-dimensional (3D) grid phantom. From a computed tomography scan, the locations of just under 10 000 control points within the phantom were accurately determined in three dimensions using a MATLAB-based computer program. MR distortion was then determined by measuring the corresponding locations of the control points when the phantom was imaged using the MR scanner. Using a reversed gradient method, distortions due to gradient nonlinearities were separated from distortions due to inhomogeneities in the background B0 field. Because the various sources of machine-related distortions can be individually characterized, distortions present in other imaging sequences (for which 3D distortion cannot accurately be measured using phantom methods) can be predicted negating the need for individual distortion calculation for a variety of other imaging sequences. Distortions were found to be primarily caused by gradient nonlinearities and maximum image distortions were reported to be less than those previously found by other researchers at 1.5 T. Finally, the image slices were corrected for distortion in order to provide geometrically accurate phantom images.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17388155     DOI: 10.1118/1.2402331

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  57 in total

1.  NonCartesian MR image reconstruction with integrated gradient nonlinearity correction.

Authors:  Shengzhen Tao; Joshua D Trzasko; Yunhong Shu; John Huston; Kevin M Johnson; Paul T Weavers; Erin M Gray; Matt A Bernstein
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  A non-invasive restraining system for awake mouse imaging.

Authors:  Dan Madularu; Axel P Mathieu; Chathura Kumaragamage; Lauren M Reynolds; Jamie Near; Cecilia Flores; M Natasha Rajah
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2017-06-17       Impact factor: 2.390

3.  Effect of fiducial marker defects on stereotactic target localization in the Leksell stereotactic system.

Authors:  Jeong-Hoon Park; Jung Ho Han; Chae-Yong Kim; Chang Wan Oh; Dong Gyu Kim; Tae-Suk Suh; Hyun-Tai Chung
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2011-04-10       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Fast concomitant gradient field and field inhomogeneity correction for spiral cardiac imaging.

Authors:  Joseph Y Cheng; Juan M Santos; John M Pauly
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-03-07       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Partial fourier and parallel MR image reconstruction with integrated gradient nonlinearity correction.

Authors:  Shengzhen Tao; Joshua D Trzasko; Yunhong Shu; Paul T Weavers; John Huston; Erin M Gray; Matt A Bernstein
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  MRI quality control for the Italian Neuroimaging Network Initiative: moving towards big data in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Loredana Storelli; Maria A Rocca; Patrizia Pantano; Elisabetta Pagani; Nicola De Stefano; Gioacchino Tedeschi; Paola Zaratin; Massimo Filippi
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2019-08-17       Impact factor: 4.849

7.  Characterization of hardware-related spatial distortions for IR-PETRA pulse sequence using a brain specific phantom.

Authors:  Sima Ahmadian; Iraj Jabbari; Seyed Mehdi Bagherimofidi; Hamidreza Saligheh Rad
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 8.  Magnetic resonance image guidance in external beam radiation therapy planning and delivery.

Authors:  Ilamurugu Arivarasan; Chandrasekaran Anuradha; Shanmuga Subramanian; Ayyalusamy Anantharaman; Velayudham Ramasubramanian
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 9.  MRI-only treatment planning: benefits and challenges.

Authors:  Amir M Owrangi; Peter B Greer; Carri K Glide-Hurst
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Distortion inherent to magnetic resonance imaging can lead to geometric miss in radiosurgery planning.

Authors:  Tyler M Seibert; Nathan S White; Gwe-Ya Kim; Vitali Moiseenko; Carrie R McDonald; Nikdokht Farid; Hauke Bartsch; Joshua Kuperman; Roshan Karunamuni; Deborah Marshall; Dominic Holland; Parag Sanghvi; Daniel R Simpson; Arno J Mundt; Anders M Dale; Jona A Hattangadi-Gluth
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2016-06-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.