Literature DB >> 25234889

Sensitivity to envelope-based interaural delays at high frequencies: center frequency affects the envelope rate-limitation.

Leslie R Bernstein1, Constantine Trahiotis1.   

Abstract

Sensitivity to ongoing interaural temporal disparities (ITDs) was measured using bandpass-filtered pulse trains centered at 4600, 6500, or 9200 Hz. Save for minor differences in the exact center frequencies, those target stimuli were those employed by Majdak and Laback [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 125, 3903-3913 (2009)]. At each center frequency, threshold ITD was measured for pulse repetition rates ranging from 64 to 609 Hz. The results and quantitative predictions by a cross-correlation-based model indicated that (1) at most pulse repetition rates, threshold ITD increased with center frequency, (2) the cutoff frequency of the putative envelope low-pass filter that determines sensitivity to ITD at high envelope rates appears to be inversely related to center frequency, and (3) both outcomes were accounted for by assuming that, independent of the center frequency, the listeners' decision variable was a constant criterion change in interaural correlation of the stimuli as processed internally. The finding of an inverse relation between center frequency and the envelope rate limitation, while consistent with much prior literature, runs counter to the conclusion reached by Majdak and Laback.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25234889      PMCID: PMC3985968          DOI: 10.1121/1.4861251

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  20 in total

1.  Lateralization of high frequencies based on interaural time differences.

Authors:  D McFadden; E G Pasanen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Enhancing sensitivity to interaural delays at high frequencies by using "transposed stimuli".

Authors:  Leslie R Bernstein; Constantine Trahiotis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  How sensitivity to ongoing interaural temporal disparities is affected by manipulations of temporal features of the envelopes of high-frequency stimuli.

Authors:  Leslie R Bernstein; Constantine Trahiotis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The effect of overall level on sensitivity to interaural differences of time and level at high frequencies.

Authors:  Mathias Dietz; Leslie R Bernstein; Constantine Trahiotis; Stephan D Ewert; Volker Hohmann
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Time-domain modeling of peripheral auditory processing: a modular architecture and a software platform.

Authors:  R D Patterson; M H Allerhand; C Giguère
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  A comparison of synchronization filters in different auditory receptor organs.

Authors:  T F Weiss; C Rose
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Detection of interaural delay in high-frequency sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones, two-tone complexes, and bands of noise.

Authors:  L R Bernstein; C Trahiotis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Selective electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve activates a pathway specialized for high temporal acuity.

Authors:  John C Middlebrooks; Russell L Snyder
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Spectral and temporal modulation tradeoff in the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Francisco A Rodríguez; Heather L Read; Monty A Escabí
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Effects of center frequency and rate on the sensitivity to interaural delay in high-frequency click trains.

Authors:  Piotr Majdak; Bernhard Laback
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  11 in total

1.  Temporal weighting functions for interaural time and level differences. IV. Effects of carrier frequency.

Authors:  G Christopher Stecker
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Binaural unmasking with temporal envelope and fine structure in listeners with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Ann E Todd; Matthew J Goupell; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The effect of envelope modulations on binaural processing.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Stephen Fong; Olga Stakhovskaya
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Sound source localization identification accuracy: Envelope dependencies.

Authors:  William A Yost
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effects of rate and age in processing interaural time and level differences in normal-hearing and bilateral cochlear-implant listeners.

Authors:  Sean R Anderson; Kyle Easter; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Advantages of Pulse Rate Compared to Modulation Frequency for Temporal Pitch Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Raymond L Goldsworthy; Susan R S Bissmeyer; Andres Camarena
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-01-03

7.  Sensitivity to Envelope Interaural Time Differences: Modeling Auditory Modulation Filtering.

Authors:  Andrew Brughera; Jimena A Ballestero; David McAlpine
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-11-05

8.  Large group differences in binaural sensitivity are represented in preattentive responses from auditory cortex.

Authors:  Angkana Lertpoompunya; Erol J Ozmeral; Nathan C Higgins; Ann C Eddins; David A Eddins
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Pitch perception is more robust to interference and better resolved when provided by pulse rate than by modulation frequency of cochlear implant stimulation.

Authors:  Raymond L Goldsworthy; Andres Camarena; Susan R S Bissmeyer
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2021-07-24       Impact factor: 3.672

10.  Sensitivity to Envelope Interaural Time Differences at High Modulation Rates.

Authors:  Jessica J M Monaghan; Stefan Bleeck; David McAlpine
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 3.293

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.