Literature DB >> 23862824

The effect of overall level on sensitivity to interaural differences of time and level at high frequencies.

Mathias Dietz1, Leslie R Bernstein, Constantine Trahiotis, Stephan D Ewert, Volker Hohmann.   

Abstract

For high-frequency complex stimuli, detection thresholds for envelope-based interaural time differences (ITDs) decrease with overall level. Substantial heterogeneity is, however, evident among the findings concerning the rate at which thresholds decline with level. This study investigated factors affecting the influence of overall level on threshold ITDs. Thresholds were measured as a function of overall level for 4-kHz-centered "targets" in three experiments focusing, respectively, on stimulus-type (sinusoidally amplitude-modulated or "transposed" tones), modulation frequency, and details concerning low-pass noise used to mask low-frequency distortion products. Results indicated that (1) log-ITD thresholds decreased linearly with overall level; (2) slopes relating log-ITD thresholds to level did not depend significantly on stimulus type; (3) lower modulation frequencies produced greater dependencies of thresholds on overall level than did higher modulation frequencies; (4) the effect of overall level on threshold-ITDs was independent of the interaural configuration and levels of the low-pass noise maskers tested; (5) synchronously gating the low-pass noise and target produced a greater dependency of thresholds on the overall level of the target than did continuous or temporally "fringed" presentation of the noise. A fourth experiment showed that threshold interaural level differences were somewhat less affected by changes in overall level than were threshold ITDs.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23862824      PMCID: PMC3724750          DOI: 10.1121/1.4807827

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  15 in total

1.  Monaural and interaural intensity discrimination: level effects and the "binaural advantage".

Authors:  Mark A Stellmack; Neal F Viemeister; Andrew J Byrne
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Lateralization of complex waveforms: effects of fine structure, amplitude, and duration.

Authors:  J M Nuetzel; E R Hafter
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Enhancing sensitivity to interaural delays at high frequencies by using "transposed stimuli".

Authors:  Leslie R Bernstein; Constantine Trahiotis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The influence of different segments of the ongoing envelope on sensitivity to interaural time delays.

Authors:  Martin Klein-Hennig; Mathias Dietz; Volker Hohmann; Stephan D Ewert
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Discrimination of interaural temporal disparities by normal-hearing listeners and listeners with high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  W J Smoski; C Trahiotis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Detectability of interaural delay in high-frequency complex waveforms.

Authors:  G B Henning
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Preservation of constant loudness with interaural amplitude asymmetry.

Authors:  K Keen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1972-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Interaural time and amplitude jnds for a 500-Hz tone.

Authors:  R M Hershkowitz; N I Durlach
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1969-12       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics.

Authors:  H Levitt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Interaural intensity difference limen.

Authors:  R C Rowland; J V Tobias
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1967-12
View more
  18 in total

1.  Channel Interaction and Current Level Affect Across-Electrode Integration of Interaural Time Differences in Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Listeners.

Authors:  Katharina Egger; Piotr Majdak; Bernhard Laback
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-09-16

2.  Relating interaural difference sensitivities for several parameters measured in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Nathaniel J Spencer; Monica L Hawley; H Steven Colburn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The effect of envelope modulations on binaural processing.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Stephen Fong; Olga Stakhovskaya
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Sensitivity to envelope-based interaural delays at high frequencies: center frequency affects the envelope rate-limitation.

Authors:  Leslie R Bernstein; Constantine Trahiotis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Binaural release from masking with single- and multi-electrode stimulation in children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Ann E Todd; Matthew J Goupell; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Across-channel interaural-level-difference processing demonstrates frequency dependence.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Olga A Stakhovskaya
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Effects of rate and age in processing interaural time and level differences in normal-hearing and bilateral cochlear-implant listeners.

Authors:  Sean R Anderson; Kyle Easter; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The Relationship Between Intensity Coding and Binaural Sensitivity in Adults With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Ann E Todd; Matthew J Goupell; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  The effect of target and interferer frequency on across-frequency binaural interference of interaural-level-difference sensitivity.

Authors:  Beth Rosen; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Effects of age on sensitivity to interaural time differences in envelope and fine structure, individually and in combination.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore; Michael G Heinz; Louis D Braida; Agnès C Léger
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.