Literature DB >> 35108112

Large group differences in binaural sensitivity are represented in preattentive responses from auditory cortex.

Angkana Lertpoompunya1,2, Erol J Ozmeral1, Nathan C Higgins1, Ann C Eddins1,2, David A Eddins1,2.   

Abstract

Correlated sounds presented to two ears are perceived as compact and centrally lateralized, whereas decorrelation between ears leads to intracranial image widening. Though most listeners have fine resolution for perceptual changes in interaural correlation (IAC), some investigators have reported large variability in IAC thresholds, and some normal-hearing listeners even exhibit seemingly debilitating IAC thresholds. It is unknown whether or not this variability across individuals and outlier manifestations are a product of task difficulty, poor training, or a neural deficit in the binaural auditory system. The purpose of this study was first to identify listeners with normal and abnormal IAC resolution, second to evaluate the neural responses elicited by IAC changes, and third to use a well-established model of binaural processing to determine a potential explanation for observed individual variability. Nineteen subjects were enrolled in the study, eight of whom were identified as poor performers in the IAC-threshold task. Global scalp responses (N1 and P2 amplitudes of an auditory change complex) in the individuals with poor IAC behavioral thresholds were significantly smaller than for listeners with better IAC resolution. Source-localized evoked responses confirmed this group effect in multiple subdivisions of the auditory cortex, including Heschl's gyrus, planum temporale, and the temporal sulcus. In combination with binaural modeling results, this study provides objective electrophysiological evidence of a binaural processing deficit linked to internal noise, that corresponds to very poor IAC thresholds in listeners that otherwise have normal audiometric profiles and lack spatial hearing complaints.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Group differences in the perception of interaural correlation (IAC) were observed in human adults with normal audiometric sensitivity. These differences were reflected in cortical-evoked activity measured via electroencephalography (EEG). For some participants, weak representation of the binaural cue at the cortical level in preattentive N1-P2 cortical responses may be indicative of a potential processing deficit. Such a deficit may be related to a poorly understood condition known as hidden hearing loss.

Entities:  

Keywords:  auditory processing model; binaural hearing; electroencephalography; hemisphere differences; hidden hearing loss

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35108112      PMCID: PMC8896993          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00360.2021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  64 in total

1.  Listener weighting of cues for lateral angle: the duplex theory of sound localization revisited.

Authors:  Ewan A Macpherson; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  Auditory evoked potentials from the cortex: audiology applications.

Authors:  Barbara Cone-Wesson; Julia Wunderlich
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.064

3.  Lateralization of high frequencies based on interaural time differences.

Authors:  D McFadden; E G Pasanen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The choice of distracting task can affect the quality of auditory evoked potentials recorded for clinical assessment.

Authors:  Brigitte A Lavoie; Jemma E Hine; Roger D Thornton
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.117

5.  Relating interaural difference sensitivities for several parameters measured in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Nathaniel J Spencer; Monica L Hawley; H Steven Colburn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Effects of interaural time delays of noise stimuli on low-frequency cells in the cat's inferior colliculus. III. Evidence for cross-correlation.

Authors:  T C Yin; J C Chan; L H Carney
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 7.  The what, where and how of auditory-object perception.

Authors:  Jennifer K Bizley; Yale E Cohen
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 34.870

8.  Binaural interaction in low-frequency neurons in inferior colliculus of the cat. I. Effects of long interaural delays, intensity, and repetition rate on interaural delay function.

Authors:  S Kuwada; T C Yin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Cortical Correlates of Binaural Temporal Processing Deficits in Older Adults.

Authors:  Ann Clock Eddins; David A Eddins
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.562

10.  Cochlear neural degeneration disrupts hearing in background noise by increasing auditory cortex internal noise.

Authors:  Jennifer Resnik; Daniel B Polley
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 17.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.