Literature DB >> 20018831

Spectral and temporal modulation tradeoff in the inferior colliculus.

Francisco A Rodríguez1, Heather L Read, Monty A Escabí.   

Abstract

The cochlea encodes sounds through frequency-selective channels that exhibit low-pass modulation sensitivity. Unlike the cochlea, neurons in the auditory midbrain are tuned for spectral and temporal modulations found in natural sounds, yet the role of this transformation is not known. We report a distinct tradeoff in modulation sensitivity and tuning that is topographically ordered within the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus (CNIC). Spectrotemporal receptive fields (STRFs) were obtained with 16-channel electrodes inserted orthogonal to the isofrequency lamina. Surprisingly, temporal and spectral characteristics exhibited an opposing relationship along the tonotopic axis. For low best frequencies (BFs), units were selective for fast temporal and broad spectral modulations. A systematic progression was observed toward slower temporal and finer spectral modulation sensitivity at high BF. This tradeoff was strongly reflected in the arrangement of excitation and inhibition and, consequently, in the modulation tuning characteristics. Comparisons with auditory nerve fibers show that these trends oppose the pattern imposed by the peripheral filters. These results suggest that spectrotemporal preferences are reordered within the tonotopic axis of the CNIC. This topographic organization has profound implications for the coding of spectrotemporal features in natural sounds and could underlie a number of perceptual phenomena.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20018831      PMCID: PMC2822687          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00813.2009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  63 in total

1.  Spectro-temporal modulation transfer functions and speech intelligibility.

Authors:  T Chi; Y Gao; M C Guyton; P Ru; S Shamma
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Linear and nonlinear pathways of spectral information transmission in the cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  J J Yu; E D Young
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Ascending efferent projections of the superior olivary complex.

Authors:  D L Oliver
Journal:  Microsc Res Tech       Date:  2000-11-15       Impact factor: 2.769

4.  Representation of temporal features of complex sounds by the discharge patterns of neurons in the owl's inferior colliculus.

Authors:  C H Keller; T T Takahashi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Auditory temporal processing: responses to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones in the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  B S Krishna; M N Semple
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Spectrotemporal receptive fields in the lemniscal auditory thalamus and cortex.

Authors:  Lee M Miller; Monty A Escabí; Heather L Read; Christoph E Schreiner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Efficient coding of natural sounds.

Authors:  Michael S Lewicki
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 24.884

8.  Nonlinear spectrotemporal sound analysis by neurons in the auditory midbrain.

Authors:  Monty A Escabi; Christoph E Schreiner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-05-15       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Listener weighting of cues for lateral angle: the duplex theory of sound localization revisited.

Authors:  Ewan A Macpherson; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Iontophoresis in vivo demonstrates a key role for GABA(A) and glycinergic inhibition in shaping frequency response areas in the inferior colliculus of guinea pig.

Authors:  F E LeBeau; M S Malmierca; A Rees
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  37 in total

1.  Receptive field dimensionality increases from the auditory midbrain to cortex.

Authors:  Craig A Atencio; Tatyana O Sharpee; Christoph E Schreiner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Neural spike-timing patterns vary with sound shape and periodicity in three auditory cortical fields.

Authors:  Christopher M Lee; Ahmad F Osman; Maxim Volgushev; Monty A Escabí; Heather L Read
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Distinct Cortical Pathways for Music and Speech Revealed by Hypothesis-Free Voxel Decomposition.

Authors:  Nancy G Kanwisher; Josh H McDermott; Sam Norman-Haignere
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Correlation of neural response properties with auditory thalamus subdivisions in the awake marmoset.

Authors:  Edward L Bartlett; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Discrimination of communication vocalizations by single neurons and groups of neurons in the auditory midbrain.

Authors:  David M Schneider; Sarah M N Woolley
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Reconstructing the spectrotemporal modulations of real-life sounds from fMRI response patterns.

Authors:  Roberta Santoro; Michelle Moerel; Federico De Martino; Giancarlo Valente; Kamil Ugurbil; Essa Yacoub; Elia Formisano
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Auditory abstraction from spectro-temporal features to coding auditory entities.

Authors:  Gal Chechik; Israel Nelken
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Emergence of band-pass filtering through adaptive spiking in the owl's cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  Bertrand Fontaine; Katrina M MacLeod; Susan T Lubejko; Louisa J Steinberg; Christine Köppl; Jose L Peña
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Sensitivity to envelope-based interaural delays at high frequencies: center frequency affects the envelope rate-limitation.

Authors:  Leslie R Bernstein; Constantine Trahiotis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  A high-density, high-channel count, multiplexed μECoG array for auditory-cortex recordings.

Authors:  Monty A Escabí; Heather L Read; Jonathan Viventi; Dae-Hyeong Kim; Nathan C Higgins; Douglas A Storace; Andrew S K Liu; Adam M Gifford; John F Burke; Matthew Campisi; Yun-Soung Kim; Andrew E Avrin; Van der Spiegel Jan; Yonggang Huang; Ming Li; Jian Wu; John A Rogers; Brian Litt; Yale E Cohen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.