Literature DB >> 34981263

Advantages of Pulse Rate Compared to Modulation Frequency for Temporal Pitch Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.

Raymond L Goldsworthy1, Susan R S Bissmeyer2,3, Andres Camarena2,4.   

Abstract

Most cochlear implants encode the fundamental frequency of periodic sounds by amplitude modulation of constant-rate pulsatile stimulation. Pitch perception provided by such stimulation strategies is markedly poor. Two experiments are reported here that consider potential advantages of pulse rate compared to modulation frequency for providing stimulation timing cues for pitch. The first experiment examines beat frequency distortion that occurs when modulating constant-rate pulsatile stimulation. This distortion has been reported on previously, but the results presented here indicate that distortion occurs for higher stimulation rates than previously reported. The second experiment examines pitch resolution as provided by pulse rate compared to modulation frequency. The results indicate that pitch discrimination is better with pulse rate than with modulation frequency. The advantage was large for rates near what has been suggested as the upper limit of temporal pitch perception conveyed by cochlear implants. The results are relevant to sound processing design for cochlear implants particularly for algorithms that encode fundamental frequency into deep envelope modulations or into precisely timed pulsatile stimulation.
© 2021. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cochlear implants; modulation; pitch

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34981263      PMCID: PMC8782986          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-021-00828-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  62 in total

1.  Pulse rate discrimination with deeply inserted electrode arrays.

Authors:  Uwe Baumann; Andrea Nobbe
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Accounting quantitatively for sensitivity to envelope-based interaural temporal disparities at high frequencies.

Authors:  Leslie R Bernstein; Constantine Trahiotis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Enhancing sensitivity to interaural delays at high frequencies by using "transposed stimuli".

Authors:  Leslie R Bernstein; Constantine Trahiotis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  How sensitivity to ongoing interaural temporal disparities is affected by manipulations of temporal features of the envelopes of high-frequency stimuli.

Authors:  Leslie R Bernstein; Constantine Trahiotis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  A simulation of chopper neurons in the cochlear nucleus with wideband input from onset neurons.

Authors:  Andreas Bahmer; Gerald Langner
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 2.086

6.  The upper limit of temporal pitch for cochlear-implant listeners: stimulus duration, conditioner pulses, and the number of electrodes stimulated.

Authors:  Robert P Carlyon; John M Deeks; Colette M McKay
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Neural correlates of the pitch of complex tones. II. Pitch shift, pitch ambiguity, phase invariance, pitch circularity, rate pitch, and the dominance region for pitch.

Authors:  P A Cariani; B Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Neural correlates of the pitch of complex tones. I. Pitch and pitch salience.

Authors:  P A Cariani; B Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Sensitivity to envelope-based interaural delays at high frequencies: center frequency affects the envelope rate-limitation.

Authors:  Leslie R Bernstein; Constantine Trahiotis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 10.  Across-channel timing differences as a potential code for the frequency of pure tones.

Authors:  Robert P Carlyon; Christopher J Long; Christophe Micheyl
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-12-08
View more
  1 in total

1.  Computational Modeling of Synchrony in the Auditory Nerve in Response to Acoustic and Electric Stimulation.

Authors:  Raymond L Goldsworthy
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 3.387

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.