Literature DB >> 25193146

Electromagnetic tracking in surgical and interventional environments: usability study.

Elodie Lugez1, Hossein Sadjadi, David R Pichora, Randy E Ellis, Selim G Akl, Gabor Fichtinger.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Electromagnetic (EM) tracking of instruments within a clinical setting is notorious for fluctuating measurement performance. Position location measurement uncertainty of an EM system was characterized in various environments, including control, clinical, cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), and CT scanner environments. Static and dynamic effects of CBCT and CT scanning on EM tracking were evaluated.
METHODS: Two guidance devices were designed to solely translate or rotate the sensor in a non-interfering fit to decouple pose-dependent tracking uncertainties. These devices were mounted on a base to allow consistent and repeatable tests when changing environments. Using this method, position and orientation measurement accuracies, precision, and 95 % confidence intervals were assessed.
RESULTS: The tracking performance varied significantly as a function of the environment-especially within the CBCT and CT scanners-and sensor pose. In fact, at a fixed sensor position in the clinical environment, the measurement error varied from 0.2 to 2.2 mm depending on sensor orientations. Improved accuracies were observed along the vertical axis of the field generator. Calibration of the measurements improved tracking performance in the CT environment by 50-85 %.
CONCLUSION: EM tracking can provide effective assistance to surgeons or interventional radiologists during procedures performed in a clinical or CBCT environment. Applications in the CT scanner demand precalibration to provide acceptable performance.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25193146     DOI: 10.1007/s11548-014-1110-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg        ISSN: 1861-6410            Impact factor:   2.924


  28 in total

1.  Quantitative analysis of factors affecting intraoperative precision and stability of optoelectronic and electromagnetic tracking systems.

Authors:  A Wagner; K Schicho; W Birkfellner; M Figl; R Seemann; F König; Franz Kainberger; R Ewers
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Evaluation of a miniature electromagnetic position tracker.

Authors:  Johann Hummel; Michael Figl; Christian Kollmann; Helmar Bergmann; Wolfgang Birkfellner
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Design and application of an assessment protocol for electromagnetic tracking systems.

Authors:  Johann B Hummel; Michael R Bax; Michael L Figl; Yan Kang; Calvin Maurer; Wolfgang W Birkfellner; Helmar Bergmann; Ramin Shahidi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Electromagnetic tracking for image-guided abdominal procedures: overall system and technical issues.

Authors:  Kevin Cleary; Hui Zhang; Neil Glossop; Elliot Levy; Bradford Wood; Filip Banovac
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2005

5.  Least-squares fitting of two 3-d point sets.

Authors:  K S Arun; T S Huang; S D Blostein
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 6.226

6.  Needle deflection estimation using fusion of electromagnetic trackers.

Authors:  H Sadjadi; K Hashtrudi-Zaad; G Fichtinger
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2012

7.  Fusion of electromagnetic trackers to improve needle deflection estimation: simulation study.

Authors:  Hossein Sadjadi; Keyvan Hashtrudi-Zaad; Gabor Fichtinger
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 4.538

8.  Accuracy of an electromagnetic tracking device: a study of the optimal range and metal interference.

Authors:  A D Milne; D G Chess; J A Johnson; G J King
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Minimizing electromagnetic interference from surgical instruments on electromagnetic surgical navigation.

Authors:  Faustin Stevens; Michael A Conditt; Nikhil Kulkarni; Sabir K Ismaily; Philip C Noble; David R Lionberger
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-05-29       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Improved modelling of tool tracking errors by modelling dependent marker errors.

Authors:  Stephen Thompson; Graeme Penney; Prokar Dasgupta; David Hawkes
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2012-09-03       Impact factor: 10.048

View more
  12 in total

1.  Automated stereo vision instrument tracking for intraoperative OCT guided anterior segment ophthalmic surgical maneuvers.

Authors:  Mohamed T El-Haddad; Yuankai K Tao
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Electromagnetically tracked personalized templates for surgical navigation.

Authors:  Andrew W L Dickinson; Michelle L Zec; David R Pichora; Brian J Rasquinha; Randy E Ellis
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Improved electromagnetic tracking for catheter path reconstruction with application in high-dose-rate brachytherapy.

Authors:  Elodie Lugez; Hossein Sadjadi; Chandra P Joshi; Selim G Akl; Gabor Fichtinger
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2017-02-18       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  Anser EMT: the first open-source electromagnetic tracking platform for image-guided interventions.

Authors:  Herman Alexander Jaeger; Alfred Michael Franz; Kilian O'Donoghue; Alexander Seitel; Fabian Trauzettel; Lena Maier-Hein; Pádraig Cantillon-Murphy
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 2.924

5.  Real-time wireless tumor tracking during breast conserving surgery.

Authors:  Natasja Janssen; Roeland Eppenga; Marie-Jeanne Vrancken Peeters; Frederieke van Duijnhoven; Hester Oldenburg; Jos van der Hage; Emiel Rutgers; Jan-Jakob Sonke; Koert Kuhlmann; Theo Ruers; Jasper Nijkamp
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 2.924

6.  Principal components of wrist circumduction from electromagnetic surgical tracking.

Authors:  Brian J Rasquinha; Michael J Rainbow; Michelle L Zec; David R Pichora; Randy E Ellis
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 2.924

7.  Modular FBG Bending Sensor for Continuum Neurosurgical Robot.

Authors:  Nahian Rahman; Nancy Deaton; Jun Sheng; Shing Shin Cheng; Jaydev P Desai
Journal:  IEEE Robot Autom Lett       Date:  2019-01-30

8.  Planning, guidance, and quality assurance of pelvic screw placement using deformable image registration.

Authors:  J Goerres; A Uneri; M Jacobson; B Ramsay; T De Silva; M Ketcha; R Han; A Manbachi; S Vogt; G Kleinszig; J-P Wolinsky; G Osgood; J H Siewerdsen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Impact of Simulated Knee Injuries on the Patellofemoral and Tibiofemoral Kinematics Investigated with an Electromagnetic Tracking Approach: A Cadaver Study.

Authors:  Björn Rath; Malte Asseln; Marcel Betsch; Andreas Prescher; Markus Tingart; Jörg Eschweiler
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Pencil beam all-optical ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  Erwin J Alles; Sacha Noimark; Edward Zhang; Paul C Beard; Adrien E Desjardins
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 3.732

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.