Literature DB >> 22961298

Improved modelling of tool tracking errors by modelling dependent marker errors.

Stephen Thompson1, Graeme Penney, Prokar Dasgupta, David Hawkes.   

Abstract

Accurate understanding of equipment tracking error is essential for decision making in image guided surgery. For tools tracked using markers attached to a rigid body, existing error estimation methods use the assumption that the individual marker errors are independent random variables. This assumption is not valid for all tracking systems. This paper presents a method to estimate a more accurate tracking error function, consisting of a systematic and random component. The proposed method does not require detailed knowledge of the tracking system physics. Results from a pointer calibration are used to demonstrate that the proposed method provides a better match to observed results than the existing state of the art. A simulation of the pointer calibration process is then used to show that existing methods can underestimate the pointer calibration error by a factor of two. A further simulation of laparoscopic camera tracking is used to show that existing methods cannot model important variations in system performance due to the angular arrangement of the tracking markers. By arranging the markers such that the systematic errors are nearly identical for all markers, the rotational component of the tracking error can be reduced, resulting in a significant reduction in target tracking errors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22961298     DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2012.2216890

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging        ISSN: 0278-0062            Impact factor:   10.048


  6 in total

1.  Electromagnetic tracking in surgical and interventional environments: usability study.

Authors:  Elodie Lugez; Hossein Sadjadi; David R Pichora; Randy E Ellis; Selim G Akl; Gabor Fichtinger
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Are fiducial registration error and target registration error correlated? SciKit-SurgeryFRED for teaching and research.

Authors:  Stephen Thompson; Tom Dowrick; Mian Ahmad; Jeremy Opie; Matthew J Clarkson
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2021-02-15

3.  A Comparison of Inertial Measurement Unit and Motion Capture Measurements of Tibiofemoral Kinematics during Simulated Pivot Landings.

Authors:  So Young Baek; Mirel Ajdaroski; Payam Mirshams Shahshahani; Mélanie L Beaulieu; Amanda O Esquivel; James A Ashton-Miller
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-11       Impact factor: 3.847

4.  Estimation of surgical tool-tip tracking error distribution in coordinate reference frame involving pivot calibration uncertainty.

Authors:  Zhe Min; Hongliang Ren; Max Q-H Meng
Journal:  Healthc Technol Lett       Date:  2017-09-18

5.  In vivo estimation of target registration errors during augmented reality laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Stephen Thompson; Crispin Schneider; Michele Bosi; Kurinchi Gurusamy; Sébastien Ourselin; Brian Davidson; David Hawkes; Matthew J Clarkson
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 2.924

6.  Hand-eye calibration for rigid laparoscopes using an invariant point.

Authors:  Stephen Thompson; Danail Stoyanov; Crispin Schneider; Kurinchi Gurusamy; Sébastien Ourselin; Brian Davidson; David Hawkes; Matthew J Clarkson
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 2.924

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.