Brian J Rasquinha1, Michael J Rainbow2, Michelle L Zec3, David R Pichora3, Randy E Ellis2,3. 1. School of Computing, Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Queen's University, Kingston, K7L 3N6, Canada. brian.rasquinha@queensu.ca. 2. School of Computing, Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Queen's University, Kingston, K7L 3N6, Canada. 3. Department of Surgery, Queen's University, Kingston, K7L 3N6, Canada.
Abstract
PURPOSE: An electromagnetic (EM) surgical tracking system was used for a functionally calibrated kinematic analysis of wrist motion. Circumduction motions were tested for differences in subject gender and for differences in the sense of the circumduction as clockwise or counter-clockwise motion. METHODS: Twenty subjects were instrumented for EM tracking. Flexion-extension motion was used to identify the functional axis. Subjects performed unconstrained wrist circumduction in a clockwise and counter-clockwise sense. Data were decomposed into orthogonal flexion-extension motions and radial-ulnar deviation motions. PCA was used to concisely represent motions. Nonparametric Wilcoxon tests were used to distinguish the groups. RESULTS: Flexion-extension motions were projected onto a direction axis with a root-mean-square error of [Formula: see text]. Using the first three principal components, there was no statistically significant difference in gender (all [Formula: see text]). For motion sense, radial-ulnar deviation distinguished the sense of circumduction in the first principal component ([Formula: see text]) and in the third principal component ([Formula: see text]); flexion-extension distinguished the sense in the second principal component ([Formula: see text]). CONCLUSION: The clockwise sense of circumduction could be distinguished by a multifactorial combination of components; there were no gender differences in this small population. These data constitute a baseline for normal wrist circumduction. The multifactorial PCA findings suggest that a higher-dimensional method, such as manifold analysis, may be a more concise way of representing circumduction in human joints.
PURPOSE: An electromagnetic (EM) surgical tracking system was used for a functionally calibrated kinematic analysis of wrist motion. Circumduction motions were tested for differences in subject gender and for differences in the sense of the circumduction as clockwise or counter-clockwise motion. METHODS: Twenty subjects were instrumented for EM tracking. Flexion-extension motion was used to identify the functional axis. Subjects performed unconstrained wrist circumduction in a clockwise and counter-clockwise sense. Data were decomposed into orthogonal flexion-extension motions and radial-ulnar deviation motions. PCA was used to concisely represent motions. Nonparametric Wilcoxon tests were used to distinguish the groups. RESULTS: Flexion-extension motions were projected onto a direction axis with a root-mean-square error of [Formula: see text]. Using the first three principal components, there was no statistically significant difference in gender (all [Formula: see text]). For motion sense, radial-ulnar deviation distinguished the sense of circumduction in the first principal component ([Formula: see text]) and in the third principal component ([Formula: see text]); flexion-extension distinguished the sense in the second principal component ([Formula: see text]). CONCLUSION: The clockwise sense of circumduction could be distinguished by a multifactorial combination of components; there were no gender differences in this small population. These data constitute a baseline for normal wrist circumduction. The multifactorial PCA findings suggest that a higher-dimensional method, such as manifold analysis, may be a more concise way of representing circumduction in human joints.
Authors: Ge Wu; Frans C T van der Helm; H E J DirkJan Veeger; Mohsen Makhsous; Peter Van Roy; Carolyn Anglin; Jochem Nagels; Andrew R Karduna; Kevin McQuade; Xuguang Wang; Frederick W Werner; Bryan Buchholz Journal: J Biomech Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 2.712
Authors: Andrew P Kraszewski; Daniel A Osei; Rohit Garg; Eugene Jang; Howard J Hillstrom; Mark W Lenhoff; Scott W Wolfe Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2015-05-18 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Elodie Lugez; Hossein Sadjadi; David R Pichora; Randy E Ellis; Selim G Akl; Gabor Fichtinger Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2014-09-06 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Howard J Hillstrom; Rohit Garg; Andrew Kraszewski; Mark Lenhoff; Timothy Carter; Sherry I Backus; Aviva Wolff; Grigory Syrkin; Richard Cheng; Scott W Wolfe Journal: J Appl Biomech Date: 2014-03-10 Impact factor: 1.833
Authors: Carolien M Toxopeus; Bauke M de Jong; Gopal Valsan; Bernard A Conway; Johannes H van der Hoeven; Klaus L Leenders; Natasha M Maurits Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-09-02 Impact factor: 3.240