Literature DB >> 25096116

Sensitivity to pulse phase duration in cochlear implant listeners: effects of stimulation mode.

Monita Chatterjee1, Aditya M Kulkarni1.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate charge-integration at threshold by cochlear implant listeners using pulse train stimuli in different stimulation modes (monopolar, bipolar, tripolar). The results partially confirmed and extended the findings of previous studies conducted in animal models showing that charge-integration depends on the stimulation mode. The primary overall finding was that threshold vs pulse phase duration functions had steeper slopes in monopolar mode and shallower slopes in more spatially restricted modes. While the result was clear-cut in eight users of the Cochlear Corporation(TM) device, the findings with the six user of the Advanced Bionics(TM) device who participated were less consistent. It is likely that different stimulation modes excite different neuronal populations and/or sites of excitation on the same neuron (e.g., peripheral process vs central axon). These differences may influence not only charge integration but possibly also temporal dynamics at suprathreshold levels and with more speech-relevant stimuli. Given the present interest in focused stimulation modes, these results have implications for cochlear implant speech processor design and protocols used to map acoustic amplitude to electric stimulation parameters.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25096116      PMCID: PMC4144184          DOI: 10.1121/1.4884773

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  33 in total

1.  Electrode configuration influences action potential initiation site and ensemble stochastic response properties.

Authors:  Charles A Miller; Paul J Abbas; Kirill V Nourski; Ning Hu; Barbara K Robinson
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  The role of spectral and temporal cues in voice gender discrimination by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu; Sherol Chinchilla; John J Galvin
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-05-20

3.  Spiral ganglion cell site of excitation I: comparison of scala tympani and intrameatal electrode responses.

Authors:  Lianne A Cartee; Charles A Miller; Chris van den Honert
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2006-04-18       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Stimulus features affecting psychophysical detection thresholds for electrical stimulation of the cochlea. I: Phase duration and stimulus duration.

Authors:  B E Pfingst; D R DeHaan; L A Holloway
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Threshold and loudness functions for pulsatile stimulation of cochlear implants.

Authors:  R V Shannon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Effects of phase duration on detection of electrical stimulation of the human cochlea.

Authors:  A K Moon; T A Zwolan; B E Pfingst
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  The spatial distribution of excitability and membrane current in normal and demyelinated mammalian nerve fibres.

Authors:  H Bostock; T A Sears; R M Sherratt
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 8.  A model of electrical excitation of the mammalian auditory-nerve neuron.

Authors:  J Colombo; C W Parkins
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1987-12-31       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Cochlear pathology of long term neomycin induced deafness in cats.

Authors:  P A Leake; G T Hradek
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Survival of spiral ganglion cells in profound sensorineural hearing loss: implications for cochlear implantation.

Authors:  J B Nadol; Y S Young; R J Glynn
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 1.547

View more
  11 in total

1.  A behavioral method to estimate charge integration efficiency in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Lixue Dong; John J Galvin
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2020-06-06       Impact factor: 2.390

2.  Evaluating Multipulse Integration as a Neural-Health Correlate in Human Cochlear-Implant Users: Relationship to Psychometric Functions for Detection

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Lixue Dong
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.293

3.  Recovery from forward masking in cochlear implant listeners depends on stimulation mode, level, and electrode location.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; Aditya M Kulkarni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Analytical solution for time-dependent potentials in a fiber stimulated by an external electrode.

Authors:  Wanda Krassowska Neu
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Evaluating Multipulse Integration as a Neural-Health Correlate in Human Cochlear Implant Users: Effects of Stimulation Mode.

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Lixue Dong; Mingqi Hang
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-10-30

6.  Estimating health of the implanted cochlea using psychophysical strength-duration functions and electrode configuration.

Authors:  Soha N Garadat; Deborah J Colesa; Donald L Swiderski; Yehoash Raphael; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Effect of Increasing Pulse Phase Duration on Neural Responsiveness of the Electrically Stimulated Cochlear Nerve.

Authors:  Shuman He; Lei Xu; Jeffrey Skidmore; Xiuhua Chao; William J Riggs; Ruijie Wang; Chloe Vaughan; Jianfen Luo; Michelle Shannon; Cynthia Warner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.562

8.  Sensitivity to Pulse Phase Duration as a Marker of Neural Health Across Cochlear Implant Recipients and Electrodes.

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Zhen Zhu; Lixue Dong; John Galvin
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-02-08

9.  Ramped pulse shapes are more efficient for cochlear implant stimulation in an animal model.

Authors:  Charlotte Amalie Navntoft; Jeremy Marozeau; Tania Rinaldi Barkat
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy of human cochleas for modeling cochlear implant electrical stimulus spread.

Authors:  C Jiang; S R de Rijk; G G Malliaras; M L Bance
Journal:  APL Mater       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 5.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.