Literature DB >> 33559041

Sensitivity to Pulse Phase Duration as a Marker of Neural Health Across Cochlear Implant Recipients and Electrodes.

Ning Zhou1, Zhen Zhu2, Lixue Dong1, John Galvin3.   

Abstract

In cochlear implants, loudness has been shown to grow more slowly with increasing pulse phase duration (PPD) than with pulse amplitude (PA), possibly due to "leaky" charge integration. This leakiness has been recently quantified in terms of "charge integration efficiency," defined as the log difference between the PPD dynamic range and PA dynamic range (both expressed in charge units), relative to a common threshold anchor. Such leakiness may differ across electrodes and/or test ears, and may reflect underlying neural health. In this study, we examined the across-site variation of charge integration in recipients of Cochlear© devices. PPD and PA dynamic ranges were measured relative to two threshold anchors with either a 25- or 50-microsecond PPD. Strength-duration functions, previously shown to relate to survival of spiral ganglion cells and peripheral processes, were compared to charge integration efficiency on selected electrodes. Results showed no significant or systematic relationship between the across-site variation in charge integration efficiency and electrode position or threshold levels. Charge integration efficiency was poorer with the 50-μs threshold anchor, suggesting that greater leakiness was associated with larger PPD dynamic ranges. Poorer and more variable charge integration efficiency across electrodes was associated with longer duration of any hearing loss, consistent with the idea that poor integration is related to neural degeneration. More variable integration efficiency was also associated with poorer speech recognition performance across test ears. The slopes of the strength-duration functions at maximum acceptable loudness were significantly correlated with charge integration efficiency. However, the strength-duration slopes were not predictive of duration of any hearing loss or speech recognition performance in our participants. As such, charge integration efficiency may be a better candidate to measure leakiness in neural populations across the electrode array, as well as the general health of the auditory nerve in human cochlear implant recipients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  across-site variability; charge integration efficiency;; cochlear implant;; dynamic range;; leakiness;; neural health;

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33559041      PMCID: PMC7943680          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-021-00784-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  33 in total

1.  Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: single neuron strength-duration functions in deafened animals.

Authors:  R K Shepherd; N A Hardie; J H Baxi
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  Threshold and channel interaction in cochlear implant users: evaluation of the tripolar electrode configuration.

Authors:  Julie Arenberg Bierer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Encoding loudness by electric stimulation of the auditory nerve.

Authors:  F G Zeng; J J Galvin; C Zhang
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1998-06-01       Impact factor: 1.837

4.  Effects of electrode configuration on psychophysical strength-duration functions for single biphasic electrical stimuli in cats.

Authors:  D W Smith; C C Finley
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Analysis of models for extracellular fiber stimulation.

Authors:  F Rattay
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Effects of phase duration on detection of electrical stimulation of the human cochlea.

Authors:  A K Moon; T A Zwolan; B E Pfingst
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Across-species comparisons of psychophysical detection thresholds for electrical stimulation of the cochlea: II. Strength-duration functions for single, biphasic pulses.

Authors:  A L Miller; D W Smith; B E Pfingst
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Auditory-nerve single-neuron thresholds to electrical stimulation from scala tympani electrodes.

Authors:  C W Parkins; J Colombo
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1987-12-31       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Comparison of signal and gap-detection thresholds for focused and broad cochlear implant electrode configurations.

Authors:  Julie Arenberg Bierer; John M Deeks; Alexander J Billig; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-02-03

10.  Reducing Channel Interaction Through Cochlear Implant Programming May Improve Speech Perception: Current Focusing and Channel Deactivation.

Authors:  Julie A Bierer; Leonid Litvak
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 3.293

View more
  1 in total

1.  Perception of speaker sincerity in complex social interactions by cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Kathrin Rothermich; Susannah Dixon; Marti Weiner; Madison Capps; Lixue Dong; Sébastien Paquette; Ning Zhou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 3.752

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.