Literature DB >> 29086155

Evaluating Multipulse Integration as a Neural-Health Correlate in Human Cochlear Implant Users: Effects of Stimulation Mode.

Ning Zhou1, Lixue Dong2, Mingqi Hang2.   

Abstract

Previous psychophysical studies have shown that a steep detection-threshold-versus-stimulation-rate function (multipulse integration; MPI) is associated with laterally positioned electrodes producing a broad neural excitation pattern. These findings are consistent with steep MPI depending on either a certain width of neural excitation allowing a large population of neurons operating at a low point on their dynamic range to respond to an increase in stimulation rate or a certain slope of excitation pattern that allows recruitment of neurons at the excitation periphery. Results of the current study provide additional support for these mechanisms by demonstrating significantly flattened MPI functions in narrow bipolar than monopolar stimulation. The study further examined the relationship between the steepness of the psychometric functions for detection (d' versus log current level) and MPI. In contrast to findings in monopolar stimulation, current data measured in bipolar stimulation suggest that steepness of the psychometric functions explained a moderate amount of the across-site variance in MPI. Steepness of the psychometric functions, however, cannot explain why MPI flattened in bipolar stimulation, since slopes of the psychometric functions were comparable in the two stimulation modes. Lastly, our results show that across-site mean MPI measured in monopolar and bipolar stimulation correlated with speech recognition in opposite signs, with steeper monopolar MPI being associated with poorer performance but steeper bipolar MPI being associated with better performance. If steeper MPI requires broad stimulation of the cochlea, the correlation between monopolar MPI and speech recognition can be interpreted as the detrimental effect of poor spectral resolution on speech recognition. Assuming bipolar stimulation produces narrow excitation, and MPI measured in bipolar stimulation reflects primarily responses of the on-site neurons, the correlation between bipolar MPI and speech recognition can be understood in light of the importance of neural survival for speech recognition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  detection thresholds; electrode configuration; neural survival; speech recognition; stimulation rate

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29086155      PMCID: PMC5783925          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-017-0643-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  41 in total

1.  Neural masking by sub-threshold electric stimuli: animal and computer model results.

Authors:  Charles A Miller; Jihwan Woo; Paul J Abbas; Ning Hu; Barbara K Robinson
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-11-16

2.  Temporal integration of trains of tone pulses by normal and by cochlearly impaired listeners.

Authors:  R P Carlyon; S Buus; M Florentine
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Neural response telemetry reconsidered: II. The influence of neural population on the ECAP recovery function and refractoriness.

Authors:  Andrew Botros; Colleen Psarros
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Loudness perception with pulsatile electrical stimulation: the effect of interpulse intervals.

Authors:  C M McKay; H J McDermott
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Relationship between channel interaction and spectral-ripple discrimination in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Gary L Jones; Jong Ho Won; Ward R Drennan; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Improving speech perception in noise with current focusing in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Arthi G Srinivasan; Monica Padilla; Robert V Shannon; David M Landsberger
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Within-subject comparison of word recognition and spiral ganglion cell count in bilateral cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Mohammad Seyyedi; Lucas M Viana; Joseph B Nadol
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  Factors Affecting Outcomes in Cochlear Implant Recipients Implanted With a Perimodiolar Electrode Array Located in Scala Tympani.

Authors:  Laura K Holden; Jill B Firszt; Ruth M Reeder; Rosalie M Uchanski; Noël Y Dwyer; Timothy A Holden
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 9.  Peripheral auditory adaptation and fatigue: a model oriented review.

Authors:  J J Eggermont
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Relationship between multipulse integration and speech recognition with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  7 in total

1.  Psychophysical Tuning Curves as a Correlate of Electrode Position in Cochlear Implant Listeners.

Authors:  Lindsay DeVries; Julie G Arenberg
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-06-04

2.  Cochlear implants and other inner ear prostheses: today and tomorrow.

Authors:  Lina Aj Reiss
Journal:  Curr Opin Physiol       Date:  2020-08-14

3.  Pulse-rate discrimination deficit in cochlear implant users: is the upper limit of pitch peripheral or central?

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Juliana Mathews; Lixue Dong
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-11-03       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Forward masking patterns by low and high-rate stimulation in cochlear implant users: Differences in masking effectiveness and spread of neural excitation.

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Lixue Dong; Susannah Dixon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-02-15       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Musical Sound Quality as a Function of the Number of Channels in Modern Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Authors:  Katelyn Berg; Jack Noble; Benoit Dawant; Robert Dwyer; Robert Labadie; Virginia Richards; René Gifford
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Current Focusing to Reduce Channel Interaction for Distant Electrodes in Cochlear Implant Programs.

Authors:  Lindsay DeVries; Julie G Arenberg
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

7.  Evaluating and Comparing Behavioural and Electrophysiological Estimates of Neural Health in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Tim Brochier; François Guérit; John M Deeks; Charlotte Garcia; Manohar Bance; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-11-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.