Literature DB >> 3840159

Threshold and loudness functions for pulsatile stimulation of cochlear implants.

R V Shannon.   

Abstract

Thresholds and loudness estimates were measured for biphasic pulsatile electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. Measures were collected as a function of the parameters: pulse duration, and pulse rate. The results indicate that the sensations of threshold and loudness are determined by a complex function of the stimulating current waveform. For stimuli with the same charge, maximum loudness is seen at the shortest pulse durations, and a secondary maximum is seen at pulse durations of 2-3 ms/phase. It is possible that the secondary peak in the loudness function and the slow growth of loudness just above threshold for long pulses are indications of dendrite survival near the electrode. If this interpretation is valid, these measures could lead to perceptual tests of peripheral nerve viability. In addition, a speech processor device could use these measures to equalize the loudness of stimuli with different pulse durations and pulse rates.

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3840159     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(85)90005-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  38 in total

1.  A behavioral method to estimate charge integration efficiency in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Lixue Dong; John J Galvin
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2020-06-06       Impact factor: 2.390

2.  Loudness adaptation in acoustic and electric hearing.

Authors:  Qing Tang; Sheng Liu; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-01-20

3.  Spatial channel interactions in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Qing Tang; Raul Benítez; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 4.  Auditory midbrain implant: a review.

Authors:  Hubert H Lim; Minoo Lenarz; Thomas Lenarz
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2009-09

5.  Amplitude modulation and loudness in cochlear implantees.

Authors:  Colette M McKay; Katherine R Henshall
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-10-02

6.  The Effect of Stimulus Polarity on the Relation Between Pitch Ranking and ECAP Spread of Excitation in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Emily R Spitzer; Sangsook Choi; Michelle L Hughes
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-01-31

7.  Stream segregation on a single electrode as a function of pulse rate in cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Sara I Duran; Leslie M Collins; Chandra S Throckmorton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Integration of Pulse Trains in Humans and Guinea Pigs with Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Casey T Kraft; Deborah J Colesa; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-05-20

9.  Sensitivity to pulse phase duration in cochlear implant listeners: effects of stimulation mode.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; Aditya M Kulkarni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  The relation between auditory-nerve temporal responses and perceptual rate integration in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes; Jacquelyn L Baudhuin; Jenny L Goehring
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-08-02       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.