Literature DB >> 1960279

Stimulus features affecting psychophysical detection thresholds for electrical stimulation of the cochlea. I: Phase duration and stimulus duration.

B E Pfingst1, D R DeHaan, L A Holloway.   

Abstract

The shapes and levels of psychophysical detection threshold versus frequency functions for sinusoidal electrical stimulation of the deafened cochlea vary from subject to subject. These variations have been shown previously to be correlated with nerve-survival patterns. The shapes of these functions are critical in the design and calibration of analog processors for auditory prostheses. This paper examines two stimulus features that may contribute to the shapes of these functions: phase duration and stimulus duration. Psychophysical experiments were performed with unilaterally deafened and implanted macaque monkeys. Effects of phase duration were studied by measuring thresholds for single symmetric biphasic pulses presented at a rate of 1 per trial. Psychophysical detection thresholds for these pulses decreased, in the region of maximum slope, at a rate averaging -6.2 dB per doubling of phase duration, which is steeper than the rate of decrease in thresholds reported for single auditory-nerve fibers. Slope was weakly correlated with threshold level. Thresholds for long-duration sinusoids were consistently lower and the slopes of the threshold versus phase-duration functions were consistently steeper than those for single pulses. Thresholds for sinusoids and pulse trains decreased as a function of stimulus duration for durations up to at least 300 ms. The rate of decrease as a function of stimulus duration depended on the phase duration of the stimulus, and for long phase-duration signals, it depended on frequency. The rate of decrease was correlated with the absolute-detection-threshold level. We conclude that phase duration contributes significantly to, but does not completely account for, the steep slopes of the threshold versus frequency functions for long-duration sinusoids. Temporal integration is greater for longer phase-duration signals, giving rise to steeper slopes of threshold functions for long-duration sinusoids as compared to those for single pulses in the 1- to 5-ms/phase range. Current neural data and models do not account for the steep slopes of psychophysical threshold functions.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1960279     DOI: 10.1121/1.401665

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  8 in total

1.  The polarity sensitivity of the electrically stimulated human auditory nerve measured at the level of the brainstem.

Authors:  Jaime A Undurraga; Robert P Carlyon; Jan Wouters; Astrid van Wieringen
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-03-12

2.  Integration of Pulse Trains in Humans and Guinea Pigs with Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Casey T Kraft; Deborah J Colesa; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-05-20

3.  Sensitivity to pulse phase duration in cochlear implant listeners: effects of stimulation mode.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; Aditya M Kulkarni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effect of interphase gap and pulse duration on electrically evoked potentials is correlated with auditory nerve survival.

Authors:  Pavel Prado-Guitierrez; Leonie M Fewster; John M Heasman; Colette M McKay; Robert K Shepherd
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2006-04-27       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Estimating health of the implanted cochlea using psychophysical strength-duration functions and electrode configuration.

Authors:  Soha N Garadat; Deborah J Colesa; Donald L Swiderski; Yehoash Raphael; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Effect of Increasing Pulse Phase Duration on Neural Responsiveness of the Electrically Stimulated Cochlear Nerve.

Authors:  Shuman He; Lei Xu; Jeffrey Skidmore; Xiuhua Chao; William J Riggs; Ruijie Wang; Chloe Vaughan; Jianfen Luo; Michelle Shannon; Cynthia Warner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.562

Review 7.  Procedural Factors That Affect Psychophysical Measures of Spatial Selectivity in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Stefano Cosentino; John M Deeks; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 3.293

8.  Sensitivity to Pulse Phase Duration as a Marker of Neural Health Across Cochlear Implant Recipients and Electrodes.

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Zhen Zhu; Lixue Dong; John Galvin
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-02-08
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.