Literature DB >> 15492884

The role of spectral and temporal cues in voice gender discrimination by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.

Qian-Jie Fu1, Sherol Chinchilla, John J Galvin.   

Abstract

The present study investigated the relative importance of temporal and spectral cues in voice gender discrimination and vowel recognition by normal-hearing subjects listening to an acoustic simulation of cochlear implant speech processing and by cochlear implant users. In the simulation, the number of speech processing channels ranged from 4 to 32, thereby varying the spectral resolution; the cutoff frequencies of the channels' envelope filters ranged from 20 to 320 Hz, thereby manipulating the available temporal cues. For normal-hearing subjects, results showed that both voice gender discrimination and vowel recognition scores improved as the number of spectral channels was increased. When only 4 spectral channels were available, voice gender discrimination significantly improved as the envelope filter cutoff frequency was increased from 20 to 320 Hz. For all spectral conditions, increasing the amount of temporal information had no significant effect on vowel recognition. Both voice gender discrimination and vowel recognition scores were highly variable among implant users. The performance of cochlear implant listeners was similar to that of normal-hearing subjects listening to comparable speech processing (4-8 spectral channels). The results suggest that both spectral and temporal cues contribute to voice gender discrimination and that temporal cues are especially important for cochlear implant users to identify the voice gender when there is reduced spectral resolution.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15492884      PMCID: PMC2504551          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-004-4046-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  28 in total

1.  Effect of stimulation rate on phoneme recognition by nucleus-22 cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Q J Fu; R V Shannon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants.

Authors:  L M Friesen; R V Shannon; D Baskent; X Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Minimum spectral contrast needed for vowel identification by normal hearing and cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  P C Loizou; O Poroy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The effect of parametric variations of cochlear implant processors on speech understanding.

Authors:  P C Loizou; O Poroy; M Dorman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Enhancing Chinese tone recognition by manipulating amplitude envelope: implications for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Xin Luo; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Effects of speech processing strategy on Chinese tone recognition by nucleus-24 cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu; Chuan-Jen Hsu; Mei-Ji Horng
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Effects of noise and spectral resolution on vowel and consonant recognition: acoustic and electric hearing.

Authors:  Q J Fu; R V Shannon; X Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Optimization of channel number and stimulation rate for the fast continuous interleaved sampling strategy in the COMBI 40+.

Authors:  S M Brill; W Gstöttner; J Helms; C von Ilberg; W Baumgartner; J Müller; J Kiefer
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1997-11

9.  The recognition of sentences in noise by normal-hearing listeners using simulations of cochlear-implant signal processors with 6-20 channels.

Authors:  M F Dorman; P C Loizou; J Fitzke; Z Tu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Identification of a speaker's sex: a study of vowels.

Authors:  S P Whiteside
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1998-04
View more
  57 in total

1.  Spatial release from masking in children with bilateral cochlear implants and with normal hearing: Effect of target-interferer similarity.

Authors:  Sara M Misurelli; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Precedence based speech segregation in bilateral cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Shaikat Hossain; Vahid Montazeri; Peter F Assmann; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effects of stimulation rate, mode and level on modulation detection by cochlear implant users.

Authors:  John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-09

Review 4.  MED-EL Cochlear implants: state of the art and a glimpse into the future.

Authors:  Ingeborg Hochmair; Peter Nopp; Claude Jolly; Marcus Schmidt; Hansjörg Schösser; Carolyn Garnham; Ilona Anderson
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-12

5.  [Experiments on prosody perception with cochlear implants].

Authors:  H Meister; D Tepeli; P Wagner; W Hess; M Walger; H von Wedel; R Lang-Roth
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.284

6.  Processing F0 with cochlear implants: Modulation frequency discrimination and speech intonation recognition.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; Shu-Chen Peng
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-11-23       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Effects of carrier pulse rate and stimulation site on modulation detection by subjects with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Bryan E Pfingst; Li Xu; Catherine S Thompson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Transfer of auditory perceptual learning with spectrally reduced speech to speech and nonspeech tasks: implications for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Jeremy L Loebach; David B Pisoni; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Effects of high-rate pulse trains on electrode discrimination in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Christina L Runge-Samuelson
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2009-06

10.  Two ears and two (or more?) devices: a pediatric case study of bilateral profound hearing loss.

Authors:  Rosalie M Uchanski; Lisa S Davidson; Sharon Quadrizius; Ruth Reeder; Jamie Cadieux; Jerrica Kettel; Richard A Chole
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2009-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.