Antonios E Papadakis1, Kostas Perisinakis, John Damilakis. 1. Department of Medical Physics, University Hospital of Heraklion, Stavrakia, P.O. Box 1352, Heraklion, 71110, Crete, Greece, apapadak@edu.med.uoc.gr.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To study the effect of patient size, body region and modulation strength on tube current and image quality on CT examinations that use automatic tube current modulation (ATCM). METHODS: Ten physical anthropomorphic phantoms that simulate an individual as neonate, 1-, 5-, 10-year-old and adult at various body habitus were employed. CT acquisition of head, neck, thorax and abdomen/pelvis was performed with ATCM activated at weak, average and strong modulation strength. The mean modulated mAs (mAsmod) values were recorded. Image noise was measured at selected anatomical sites. RESULTS: The mAsmod recorded for neonate compared to 10-year-old increased by 30 %, 14 %, 6 % and 53 % for head, neck, thorax and abdomen/pelvis, respectively, (P < 0.05). The mAsmod was lower than the preselected mAs with the exception of the 10-year-old phantom. In paediatric and adult phantoms, the mAsmod ranged from 44 and 53 for weak to 117 and 93 for strong modulation strength, respectively. At the same exposure parameters image noise increased with body size (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The ATCM system studied here may affect dose differently for different patient habitus. Dose may decrease for overweight adults but increase for children older than 5 years old. Care should be taken when implementing ATCM protocols to ensure that image quality is maintained. KEY POINTS: • ATCM efficiency is related to the size of the patient's body. • ATCM should be activated without caution in overweight adult individuals. • ATCM may increase radiation dose in children older than 5 years old. • ATCM efficiency depends on the protocol selected for a specific anatomical region. • Modulation strength may be appropriately tuned to enhance ATCM efficiency.
OBJECTIVES: To study the effect of patient size, body region and modulation strength on tube current and image quality on CT examinations that use automatic tube current modulation (ATCM). METHODS: Ten physical anthropomorphic phantoms that simulate an individual as neonate, 1-, 5-, 10-year-old and adult at various body habitus were employed. CT acquisition of head, neck, thorax and abdomen/pelvis was performed with ATCM activated at weak, average and strong modulation strength. The mean modulated mAs (mAsmod) values were recorded. Image noise was measured at selected anatomical sites. RESULTS: The mAsmod recorded for neonate compared to 10-year-old increased by 30 %, 14 %, 6 % and 53 % for head, neck, thorax and abdomen/pelvis, respectively, (P < 0.05). The mAsmod was lower than the preselected mAs with the exception of the 10-year-old phantom. In paediatric and adult phantoms, the mAsmod ranged from 44 and 53 for weak to 117 and 93 for strong modulation strength, respectively. At the same exposure parameters image noise increased with body size (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The ATCM system studied here may affect dose differently for different patient habitus. Dose may decrease for overweight adults but increase for children older than 5 years old. Care should be taken when implementing ATCM protocols to ensure that image quality is maintained. KEY POINTS: • ATCM efficiency is related to the size of the patient's body. • ATCM should be activated without caution in overweight adult individuals. • ATCM may increase radiation dose in children older than 5 years old. • ATCM efficiency depends on the protocol selected for a specific anatomical region. • Modulation strength may be appropriately tuned to enhance ATCM efficiency.
Authors: Mannudeep K Kalra; Michael M Maher; Thomas L Toth; Ravi S Kamath; Elkan F Halpern; Sanjay Saini Journal: Radiology Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Marco Das; Andreas Horst Mahnken; Georg Mühlenbruch; Achim Stargardt; Claudia Weiss; Dirk-Alexander Sennst; Thomas G Flohr; Rolf W Günther; Joachim Ernst Wildberger Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Mannudeep K Kalra; Michael M Maher; Thomas L Toth; Bernhard Schmidt; Bryan L Westerman; Hugh T Morgan; Sanjay Saini Journal: Radiology Date: 2004-10-21 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Joel Aissa; Johannes Boos; Christian Rubbert; Julian Caspers; Christoph Schleich; Christoph Thomas; Patric Kröpil; Gerald Antoch; Falk Miese Journal: Forensic Sci Med Pathol Date: 2017-03-07 Impact factor: 2.007
Authors: Susan C Shelmerdine; Chandra Y Gerrard; Padma Rao; Matthew Lynch; Jeroen Kroll; Dan Martin; Elka Miller; Laura Filograna; Rosa Maria Martinez; Odey Ukpo; Barry Daly; Hideki Hyodoh; Karl Johnson; Andrew Watt; Ajay Taranath; Scott Brown; David Perry; Lene Warner Thorup Boel; Aleksandra Borowska-Solonynko; Rick van Rijn; Willemijn Klein; Elspeth Whitby; Owen J Arthurs Journal: Pediatr Radiol Date: 2019-02-28