G Solomou1, A E Papadakis, J Damilakis. 1. Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Physics, University of Crete, Heraklion, P.O. Box 2208, 71003, Crete, Greece.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of patient centring on conceptus radiation dose and image quality in abdominal CT during pregnancy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three anthropomorphic phantoms that represent a pregnant woman at the three trimesters of gestation were subjected to a routine abdominal CT. Examinations were performed with fixed mAs (mAsf) and with the automatic exposure control system (AEC) activated. The percent reduction between mAsf and modulated mAs (mAsmod) was calculated. Conceptus dose (Dc) was measured using thermoluminencent dosimeters. To study the effect of misplacement of pregnant women on Dc, each phantom was positioned at various locations relative to gantry isocentre. Image quality was evaluated on the basis of image noise, signal-to-noise ratio, and contrast-to-noise ratio. RESULTS: The maximum reduction between mAsf and mAsmod was 59.8 %, while the corresponding DC reduction was 59.3 %. DC was found to decrease by up to 25 % and 7.9 % for phantom locations below and above the isocentre, respectively. Image quality deteriorated when AEC was activated, and it was progressively improved from lower to higher than the isocentre locations. CONCLUSION: Centring errors do not result in an increase in Dc. To maintain image quality, accurate centring is required. KEY POINTS: • AEC activation reduces conceptus radiation dose at all gestational stages. • Patients should be accurately aligned at the gantry isocenter. • Patient centring deserves increased attention in clinical practice. • Pregnant patient centring errors do not considerably affect conceptus dose.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of patient centring on conceptus radiation dose and image quality in abdominal CT during pregnancy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three anthropomorphic phantoms that represent a pregnant woman at the three trimesters of gestation were subjected to a routine abdominal CT. Examinations were performed with fixed mAs (mAsf) and with the automatic exposure control system (AEC) activated. The percent reduction between mAsf and modulated mAs (mAsmod) was calculated. Conceptus dose (Dc) was measured using thermoluminencent dosimeters. To study the effect of misplacement of pregnant women on Dc, each phantom was positioned at various locations relative to gantry isocentre. Image quality was evaluated on the basis of image noise, signal-to-noise ratio, and contrast-to-noise ratio. RESULTS: The maximum reduction between mAsf and mAsmod was 59.8 %, while the corresponding DC reduction was 59.3 %. DC was found to decrease by up to 25 % and 7.9 % for phantom locations below and above the isocentre, respectively. Image quality deteriorated when AEC was activated, and it was progressively improved from lower to higher than the isocentre locations. CONCLUSION: Centring errors do not result in an increase in Dc. To maintain image quality, accurate centring is required. KEY POINTS: • AEC activation reduces conceptus radiation dose at all gestational stages. • Patients should be accurately aligned at the gantry isocenter. • Patient centring deserves increased attention in clinical practice. • Pregnant patient centring errors do not considerably affect conceptus dose.
Authors: Anthony G Gilet; Jared M Dunkin; Thomas J Fernandez; Terry M Button; Nancy E Budorick Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Lawrence T Dauer; Raymond H Thornton; Donald L Miller; John Damilakis; Robert G Dixon; M Victoria Marx; Beth A Schueler; Eliseo Vañó; Aradhana Venkatesan; Gabriel Bartal; Dimitrios Tsetis; John F Cardella Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2011-11-23 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: Mannudeep K Kalra; Michael M Maher; Thomas L Toth; Bernhard Schmidt; Bryan L Westerman; Hugh T Morgan; Sanjay Saini Journal: Radiology Date: 2004-10-21 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Tianwu Xie; Pierre-Alexandre Poletti; Alexandra Platon; Christoph D Becker; Habib Zaidi Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2017-09-08 Impact factor: 5.315