Literature DB >> 19741359

Assessment of organ absorbed doses and estimation of effective doses from pediatric anthropomorphic phantom measurements for multi-detector row CT with and without automatic exposure control.

Hervé J Brisse1, Magalie Robilliard, Alexia Savignoni, Noelle Pierrat, Geneviève Gaboriaud, Yann De Rycke, Sylvia Neuenschwander, Bernard Aubert, Jean-Claude Rosenwald.   

Abstract

This study was designed to measure organ absorbed doses from multi-detector row computed tomography (MDCT) on pediatric anthropomorphic phantoms, calculate the corresponding effective doses, and assess the influence of automatic exposure control (AEC) in terms of organ dose variations. Four anthropomorphic phantoms (phantoms represent the equivalent of a newborn, 1-, 5-, and 10-y-old child) were scanned with a four-channel MDCT coupled with a z-axis-based AEC system. Two CT torso protocols were compared: a first protocol without AEC and constant tube current-time product and a second protocol with AEC using age-adjusted noise indices. Organ absorbed doses were monitored by thermoluminescent dosimeters (LiF: Mg, Cu, P). Effective doses were calculated according to the tissue weighting factors of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (). For fixed mA acquisitions, organ doses normalized to the volume CT dose index in a 16-cm head phantom (CTDIvol16) ranged from 0.6 to 1.5 and effective doses ranged from 8.4 to 13.5 mSv. For the newborn-equivalent phantom, the AEC-modulated scan showed almost no significant dose variation compared to the fixed mA scan. For the 1-, 5- and 10-y equivalent phantoms, the use of AEC induced a significant dose decrease on chest organs (ranging from 61 to 31% for thyroid, 37 to 21% for lung, 34 to 17% for esophagus, and 39 to 10% for breast). However, AEC also induced a significant dose increase (ranging from 28 to 48% for salivary glands, 22 to 51% for bladder, and 24 to 70% for ovaries) related to the high density of skull base and pelvic bones. These dose increases should be considered before using AEC as a dose optimization tool in children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19741359     DOI: 10.1097/HP.0b013e3181ad00ed

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Phys        ISSN: 0017-9078            Impact factor:   1.316


  18 in total

1.  A comparison of radiation exposure between diagnostic CTA and DSA examinations of cerebral and cervicocerebral vessels.

Authors:  A-L Manninen; J-M Isokangas; A Karttunen; T Siniluoto; M T Nieminen
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  Exposing the thyroid to radiation: a review of its current extent, risks, and implications.

Authors:  Bridget Sinnott; Elaine Ron; Arthur B Schneider
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 19.871

3.  Dose reduction with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction for paediatric CT: phantom study and clinical experience on chest and abdomen CT.

Authors:  F Gay; Y Pavia; N Pierrat; S Lasalle; S Neuenschwander; H J Brisse
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Automatic exposure control in CT: the effect of patient size, anatomical region and prescribed modulation strength on tube current and image quality.

Authors:  Antonios E Papadakis; Kostas Perisinakis; John Damilakis
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Radiation dose levels in pediatric chest CT: experience in 499 children evaluated with dual-source single-energy CT.

Authors:  Remy-Jardin Martine; Teresa Santangelo; Lucie Colas; Faivre Jean-Baptiste; Alain Duhamel; Antoine Deschildre; Jacques Remy
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2016-11-09

6.  KERMA ratios in pediatric CT dosimetry.

Authors:  Walter Huda; Kent M Ogden; Robert L Lavallee; Marsha L Roskopf; Ernest M Scalzetti
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2012-03-20

7.  Multicentre survey on patient dose in paediatric imaging and proposal for updated diagnostic reference levels for France. Part 1: computed tomography.

Authors:  David Célier; Patrice Roch; Cécile Etard; Hubert Ducou Le Pointe; Hervé J Brisse
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Thyroid cancer risk 40+ years after irradiation for an enlarged thymus: an update of the Hempelmann cohort.

Authors:  Michael Jacob Adams; Roy E Shore; Ann Dozier; Steven E Lipshultz; Ronald G Schwartz; Louis S Constine; Thomas A Pearson; Marilyn Stovall; Kelly Thevenet-Morrison; Susan G Fisher
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 2.841

9.  Estimated risk of radiation-induced cancer from paediatric chest CT: two-year cohort study.

Authors:  Tilo Niemann; Lucie Colas; Hans W Roser; Teresa Santangelo; Jean Baptiste Faivre; Jaques Remy; Martine Remy-Jardin; Jens Bremerich
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2014-10-02

10.  Fetal doses to pregnant patients from CT with tube current modulation calculated using Monte Carlo simulations and realistic phantoms.

Authors:  Jianwei Gu; X George Xu; Peter F Caracappa; Bob Liu
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 0.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.