Literature DB >> 28265799

Optimizing radiation exposure in screening of body packing: image quality and diagnostic acceptability of an 80 kVp protocol with automated tube current modulation.

Joel Aissa1, Johannes Boos2, Christian Rubbert2, Julian Caspers2, Christoph Schleich2, Christoph Thomas2, Patric Kröpil2, Gerald Antoch2, Falk Miese2.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the objective and subjective image quality of a novel computed tomography (CT) protocol with reduced radiation dose for body packing with 80 kVp and automated tube current modulation (ATCM) compared to a standard body packing CT protocol. 80 individuals who were examined between March 2012 and July 2015 in suspicion of ingested drug packets were retrospectively included in this study. Thirty-one CT examinations were performed using ATCM and a fixed tube voltage of 80 kVp (group A). Forty-nine CT examinations were performed using a standard protocol with a tube voltage of 120 kVp and a fixed tube current time product of 40 mAs (group B). Subjective and objective image quality and visibility of drug packets were assessed. Radiation exposure of both protocols was compared. Contrast-to-noise ratio (group A: 0.56 ± 0.36; group B: 1.13 ± 0.91) and Signal-to-noise ratio (group A: 3.69 ± 0.98; group B: 7.08 ± 2.67) were significantly lower for group A compared to group B (p < 0.001). Subjectively, image quality was decreased for group A compared to group B (2.5 ± 0.8 vs. 1.2 ± 0.4; p < 0.001). Attenuation of body packets was higher with the new protocol (group A: 362.2 ± 70.3 Hounsfield Units (HU); group B: 210.6 ± 60.2 HU; p = 0.005). Volumetric Computed Tomography Dose Index (CTDIvol) and Dose Length Product (DLP) were significantly lower in group A (CTDIvol 2.2 ± 0.9 mGy, DLP 105.7 ± 52.3 mGycm) as compared to group B (CTDIvol 2.7 ± 0.1 mGy, DLP 126.0 ± 9.7 mGycm, p = 0.002 and p = 0.01). The novel 80 kVp CT protocol with ATCM leads to a significant dose reduction compared to a standard CT body packing protocol. The novel protocol led to a diagnostic image quality and cocaine body packets were reliably detected due to the high attenuation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute abdominal; Body packing; Cocaine; Forensic radiology; Radiation dose reduction

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28265799     DOI: 10.1007/s12024-017-9848-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol        ISSN: 1547-769X            Impact factor:   2.007


  19 in total

1.  Low-dose computed tomography to detect body-packing in an animal model.

Authors:  M H Maurer; S M Niehues; D Schnapauff; C Grieser; J H Rothe; D Waldmüller; S S Chopra; B Hamm; T Denecke
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2010-10-02       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 2.  Visual grading characteristics (VGC) analysis: a non-parametric rank-invariant statistical method for image quality evaluation.

Authors:  M Båth; L G Månsson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2006-07-19       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Detection of ingested cocaine-filled packets--diagnostic value of unenhanced CT.

Authors:  Sabine Schmidt; Olivier Hugli; Elena Rizzo; Domenico Lepori; F Gudinchet; Bertrand Yersin; Pierre Schnyder; Jean-Yves Meuwly
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2007-09-04       Impact factor: 3.528

4.  Heroin body packing: clearly discerning drug packets using CT.

Authors:  Rui-Meng Yang; Long Li; Jie Feng; Sheng-Sheng Lai; Bing-Quan Lin; Tian Yu; Xiang-Hua Ye; Yi-Kai Xu
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 0.954

Review 5.  Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog.

Authors:  Fred A Mettler; Walter Huda; Terry T Yoshizumi; Mahadevappa Mahesh
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Body packers on your examination table: How helpful are plain x-ray images? A definitive low-dose CT protocol as a diagnosis tool for body packers.

Authors:  B Schulz; A Grossbach; T Gruber-Rouh; S Zangos; Th J Vogl; K Eichler
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 2.350

7.  Comparison of different body size parameters for individual dose adaptation in body CT of adults.

Authors:  Jan Menke
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Low-dose versus standard-dose CT protocol in patients with clinically suspected renal colic.

Authors:  Pierre-Alexandre Poletti; Alexandra Platon; Olivier T Rutschmann; Franz R Schmidlin; Christophe E Iselin; Christoph D Becker
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  The "body packer syndrome"-toxicity following ingestion of illicit drugs packaged for transportation.

Authors:  C V Wetli; R E Mittlemann
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 1.832

10.  Screening of illegal intracorporeal containers ("body packing"): is abdominal radiography sufficiently accurate? A comparative study with low-dose CT.

Authors:  Pierre-Alexandre Poletti; Laurent Canel; Christoph D Becker; Hans Wolff; Bernice Elger; Eric Lock; François Sarasin; Monica S Bonfanti; Elise Dupuis-Lozeron; Thomas Perneger; Alexandra Platon
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  3 in total

1.  Commentary on a case of body pushing and radiation exposure in screening of body packing.

Authors:  Simone Cappelletti; Costantino Ciallella
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 2.007

2.  Noise insertion in CT for cocaine body packing: where is the limit of extensive dose reduction?

Authors:  Joel Aissa; Edwin Bölke; Lino M Sawicki; Elisabeth Appel; Christoph Thomas; Philipp Heusch; Martin Sedlmair; Karl Krzymyk; Patric Kröpil; Gerald Antoch; Johannes Boos
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 2.175

3.  Clinical, Diagnostic, and Treatment Features of Body Packing in Brazil: Drugs, Cell Phones, and Beyond.

Authors:  Vinícius Henrique A Guimarães; Carolina Cassiano; Dylmadson Iago B Queiroz; Ricardo Pastore; Roberto Lenza; Carlo Jose Freire Oliveira
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-08-11
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.