OBJECTIVES: To compare image quality and radiation dose of pre-transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) aortoiliofemoral CT angiography (AICTA) provided by standard vs. dual-energy mode with reduced iodine load protocols. METHODS: One hundred and sixty-one patients underwent a two-step CTA protocol before TAVI including cardiac CTA with injection of 65 mL of iodinated contrast agent (ICA), immediately followed by AICTA. From this second acquisition, the following three different patient groups were identified: Group 1: 52 patients with standard AICTA (60 mL ICA, 100 kVp, mA automodulation); Group 2: 48 patients with dual-energy AICTA with 50 % iodine load reduction (30 mL ICA, fast kVp switching, 600 mA); Group 3: 61 patients with an identical protocol to Group 2, but exposed to 375 mA. The qualitative/subjective image quality (13-point score) and quantitative/objective image quality (contrast attenuation and image noise) were evaluated. The radiation dose was recorded. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in non-diagnostic images between the three protocols. Contrast attenuation, signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio were significantly higher, whereas noise was significantly lower in the standard protocol (all P < 0.05). The radiation dose was lower in the dual-energy protocol at 375 mA (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Dual-energy AICTA before TAVI results in a reduction of iodine load while maintaining sufficient diagnostic information despite increased noise. KEY POINTS: • Dual-energy AICTA before TAVI results in a 50 % reduction of iodine load. •The reduction of iodine load maintains sufficient image quality despite increased noise. • Using 375 mA in dual-energy mode results in a reduction of radiation dose. • A high tube current setting (600 mA) should be used in overweight patients.
OBJECTIVES: To compare image quality and radiation dose of pre-transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) aortoiliofemoral CT angiography (AICTA) provided by standard vs. dual-energy mode with reduced iodine load protocols. METHODS: One hundred and sixty-one patients underwent a two-step CTA protocol before TAVI including cardiac CTA with injection of 65 mL of iodinated contrast agent (ICA), immediately followed by AICTA. From this second acquisition, the following three different patient groups were identified: Group 1: 52 patients with standard AICTA (60 mL ICA, 100 kVp, mA automodulation); Group 2: 48 patients with dual-energy AICTA with 50 % iodine load reduction (30 mL ICA, fast kVp switching, 600 mA); Group 3: 61 patients with an identical protocol to Group 2, but exposed to 375 mA. The qualitative/subjective image quality (13-point score) and quantitative/objective image quality (contrast attenuation and image noise) were evaluated. The radiation dose was recorded. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in non-diagnostic images between the three protocols. Contrast attenuation, signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio were significantly higher, whereas noise was significantly lower in the standard protocol (all P < 0.05). The radiation dose was lower in the dual-energy protocol at 375 mA (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Dual-energy AICTA before TAVI results in a reduction of iodine load while maintaining sufficient diagnostic information despite increased noise. KEY POINTS: • Dual-energy AICTA before TAVI results in a 50 % reduction of iodine load. •The reduction of iodine load maintains sufficient image quality despite increased noise. • Using 375 mA in dual-energy mode results in a reduction of radiation dose. • A high tube current setting (600 mA) should be used in overweight patients.
Authors: Courtney A Coursey; Rendon C Nelson; Daniel T Boll; Erik K Paulson; Lisa M Ho; Amy M Neville; Daniele Marin; Rajan T Gupta; Sebastian T Schindera Journal: Radiographics Date: 2010 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 5.333
Authors: Subodh B Joshi; Dorinna D Mendoza; Daniel H Steinberg; Matthew A Goldstein; Cristian F Lopez; Arnold Raizon; Gaby Weissman; Lowell F Satler; Augusto D Pichard; Wm Guy Weigold Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2009-12
Authors: Sarabjeet Singh; Mannudeep K Kalra; Matthew D Gilman; Jiang Hsieh; Homer H Pien; Subba R Digumarthy; Jo-Anne O Shepard Journal: Radiology Date: 2011-03-08 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: David A Wood; Laurens F Tops; John R Mayo; Sanjeevan Pasupati; Martin J Schalij; Karin Humphries; May Lee; Abdullah Al Ali; Brad Munt; Rob Moss; Christopher R Thompson; Jeroen J Bax; John G Webb Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2009-05-01 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Tommaso D'Angelo; Giuseppe Cicero; Silvio Mazziotti; Giorgio Ascenti; Moritz H Albrecht; Simon S Martin; Ahmed E Othman; Thomas J Vogl; Julian L Wichmann Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2019-04-09 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Simon S Martin; Moritz H Albrecht; Julian L Wichmann; Kristina Hüsers; Jan-Erik Scholtz; Christian Booz; Boris Bodelle; Ralf W Bauer; Sarah C Metzger; Thomas J Vogl; Thomas Lehnert Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2016-05-28 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Domenico De Santis; Damiano Caruso; U Joseph Schoepf; Marwen Eid; Moritz H Albrecht; Taylor M Duguay; Akos Varga-Szemes; Andrea Laghi; Carlo N De Cecco Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2018-02-27 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Damiano Caruso; Russell D Rosenberg; Carlo N De Cecco; Stefanie Mangold; Julian L Wichmann; Akos Varga-Szemes; Daniel H Steinberg; Andrea Laghi; U Joseph Schoepf Journal: Curr Cardiol Rep Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 2.931
Authors: Markus M Obmann; Gopal Punjabi; Verena C Obmann; Daniel T Boll; Tobias Heye; Matthias R Benz; Benjamin M Yeh Journal: Abdom Radiol (NY) Date: 2021-06-30