Literature DB >> 19406275

Role of multislice computed tomography in transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

David A Wood1, Laurens F Tops, John R Mayo, Sanjeevan Pasupati, Martin J Schalij, Karin Humphries, May Lee, Abdullah Al Ali, Brad Munt, Rob Moss, Christopher R Thompson, Jeroen J Bax, John G Webb.   

Abstract

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) required precise knowledge of the anatomic dimensions and physical characteristics of the aortic valve, annulus, and aortic root. Most groups currently use angiography, transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), or transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) to assess aortic annulus dimensions and anatomy. However, multislice computed tomography (MSCT) may allow more detailed 3-dimensional assessment of the aortic root. Twenty-six patients referred for TAVR underwent MSCT. Scans were also obtained for 18 patients after TAVR. All patients underwent pre- and postprocedural aortic root angiography, TTE, and TEE. Mean differences in measured aortic annular diameters were 1.1 mm (95% confidence interval 0.5, 1.8) for calibrated angiography and TTE, -0.9 mm (95% confidence interval -1.7, -0.1 mm) for TTE and TEE, -0.3 mm (95% confidence interval -1.1, 0.6 mm) for MSCT (sagittal) and TTE, and -1.2 mm (95% confidence interval -2.2, -0.2 mm) for MSCT (sagittal) and TEE. Coronal systolic measurements using MSCT, which corresponded to angiographic orientation, were 3.2 mm (1st and 3rd quartiles 2.6, 3.9) larger than sagittal systolic measurements, which were in the same anatomic plane as standard TTE and TEE views. There was no significant association between either shape of the aortic annulus or amount of aortic valve calcium and development of perivalvular aortic regurgitation. After TAVR, the prosthesis extended to or beyond the inferior border of the left main ostium in 9 of 18 patients (50%), and in 11 patients (61%), valvular calcium was <5 mm from the left main ostium. In conclusion, MSCT identified that the aortic annulus was commonly eccentric and often oval. This may in part explain the small, but clinically insignificant, differences in measured aortic annular diameters with other imaging modalities. MSCT after TAVR showed close proximity of both the prosthesis and displaced valvular calcium to the left main ostium in most patients. Neither eccentricity nor calcific deposits appeared to contribute significantly to severity of paravalvular regurgitation after TAVR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19406275     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.01.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  35 in total

1.  Cyclic changes in area- and perimeter-derived effective dimensions of the aortic annulus measured with multislice computed tomography and comparison with metric intraoperative sizing.

Authors:  Won-Keun Kim; Alexander Meyer; Helge Möllmann; Andreas Rolf; Susanne Möllmann; Johannes Blumenstein; Arnaud Van Linden; Christian W Hamm; Thomas Walther; Jörg Kempfert
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 5.460

2.  Computed tomography of dynamic changes of the aortic root during systole and diastole in patients with coronary artery calcification.

Authors:  Xiaohan Hu; Claudia Frellesen; Ralf W Bauer; J Matthias Kerl; Martin Beeres; Boris Bodelle; Thomas Lehnert; Thomas J Vogl; Julian L Wichmann
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  Aortic annulus dimension assessment by computed tomography for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: differences between systole and diastole.

Authors:  Angela G Bertaso; Dennis T L Wong; Gary Y H Liew; Michael S Cunnington; James D Richardson; Viji S Thomson; Brett Lorraine; George Kourlis; Diana Leech; Matthew I Worthley; Stephen G Worthley
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Aortic valve calcium scoring is a predictor of paravalvular aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Andrea Colli; Michele Gallo; Eduardo Bernabeu; Augusto D'Onofrio; Vincenzo Tarzia; Gino Gerosa
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-07

5.  Aortic valve calcium load before TAVI: Is it important?

Authors:  Martin Haensig; Ardawan Julian Rastan
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-07

6.  Thoracic aorta cardiac-cycle related dynamic changes assessed with a 256-slice CT scanner.

Authors:  Patricia Carrascosa; Carlos Capuñay; Alejandro Deviggiano; Gastón A Rodríguez-Granillo; María Inés Sagarduy; Patricio Cortines; Jorge Carrascosa; Juan C Parodi
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2013-09

Review 7.  Aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: mechanisms and implications.

Authors:  Barbara E Stähli; Willibald Maier; Roberto Corti; Thomas F Lüscher; Rolf Jenni; Felix C Tanner
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2013-03

Review 8.  Computed tomography in the evaluation for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).

Authors:  Paul Schoenhagen; Jörg Hausleiter; Stephan Achenbach; Milind Y Desai; E Murat Tuzcu
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2011-12

Review 9.  Transcatheter aortic valve repair, imaging, and electronic imaging health record.

Authors:  Paul Schoenhagen; Juergen Falkner; David Piraino
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.931

10.  Comparison of aortic root dimension changes during cardiac cycle between the patients with and without aortic valve calcification using ECG-gated 64-slice and dual-source 256-slice computed tomography scanners: results of a multicenter study.

Authors:  Abbas Arjmand Shabestari; Ramin Pourghorban; Mahmood Tehrai; Hamidreza Pouraliakbar; Taraneh Faghihi Langroudi; Hooman Bakhshandeh; Seifollah Abdi
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-04-13       Impact factor: 2.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.