The mechanism for activation of orotidine 5'-monophosphate decarboxylase (OMPDC) by interactions of side chains from Gln215 and Try217 at a gripper loop and R235, adjacent to this loop, with the phosphodianion of OMP was probed by determining the kinetic parameters k(cat) and K(m) for all combinations of single, double, and triple Q215A, Y217F, and R235A mutations. The 12 kcal/mol intrinsic binding energy of the phosphodianion is shown to be equal to the sum of the binding energies of the side chains of R235 (6 kcal/mol), Q215 (2 kcal/mol), Y217 (2 kcal/mol), and hydrogen bonds to the G234 and R235 backbone amides (2 kcal/mol). Analysis of a triple mutant cube shows small (ca. 1 kcal/mol) interactions between phosphodianion gripper side chains, which are consistent with steric crowding of the side chains around the phosphodianion at wild-type OMPDC. These mutations result in the same change in the activation barrier to the OMPDC-catalyzed reactions of the whole substrate OMP and the substrate pieces (1-β-D-erythrofuranosyl)orotic acid (EO) and phosphite dianion. This shows that the transition states for these reactions are stabilized by similar interactions with the protein catalyst. The 12 kcal/mol intrinsic phosphodianion binding energy of OMP is divided between the 8 kcal/mol of binding energy, which is utilized to drive a thermodynamically unfavorable conformational change of the free enzyme, resulting in an increase in (k(cat))(obs) for OMPDC-catalyzed decarboxylation of OMP, and the 4 kcal/mol of binding energy, which is utilized to stabilize the Michaelis complex, resulting in a decrease in (K(m))(obs).
The mechanism for activation of orotidine 5'-monophosphate decarboxylase (OMPDC) by interactions of side chains from Gln215 and Try217 at a gripper loop and R235, adjacent to this loop, with the phosphodianion of OMP was probed by determining the kinetic parameters k(cat) and K(m) for all combinations of single, double, and triple Q215A, Y217F, and R235A mutations. The 12 kcal/mol intrinsic binding energy of the phosphodianion is shown to be equal to the sum of the binding energies of the side chains of R235 (6 kcal/mol), Q215 (2 kcal/mol), Y217 (2 kcal/mol), and hydrogen bonds to the G234 and R235 backbone amides (2 kcal/mol). Analysis of a triple mutant cube shows small (ca. 1 kcal/mol) interactions between phosphodianion gripper side chains, which are consistent with steric crowding of the side chains around the phosphodianion at wild-type OMPDC. These mutations result in the same change in the activation barrier to the OMPDC-catalyzed reactions of the whole substrate OMP and the substrate pieces (1-β-D-erythrofuranosyl)orotic acid (EO) and phosphite dianion. This shows that the transition states for these reactions are stabilized by similar interactions with the protein catalyst. The 12 kcal/mol intrinsic phosphodianion binding energy of OMP is divided between the 8 kcal/mol of binding energy, which is utilized to drive a thermodynamically unfavorable conformational change of the free enzyme, resulting in an increase in (k(cat))(obs) for OMPDC-catalyzed decarboxylation of OMP, and the 4 kcal/mol of binding energy, which is utilized to stabilize the Michaelis complex, resulting in a decrease in (K(m))(obs).
The underlying cause for enzymatic catalysis
is stabilization of
the transition state by interactions with the protein catalyst.[1] Interactions between protein catalysts and a
nonreacting substrate phosphodianion are utilized to provide ca. 12
kcal/mol stabilization of transition states of a diverse set of enzymatic
reactions, including carbon deprotonation (triosephosphate isomerase
and orotidine 5′-monophosphate decarboxylase),[2−4] decarboxylation (orotidine 5′-monophosphate decarboxylase),[5] hydride transfer (l-glycerol phosphate
dehydrogenase),[6] phosphoryl transfer (phosphoglucomutase),[7] and a multistep reaction (1-deoxy-d-xylulose-5-phosphate
reductoisomerase).[8] This transition state
stabilization is due to interactions expressed at the ground-state
Michaelis complex, which favor tight substrate binding, and to the
utilization of the phosphodianion binding energy to activate the enzyme
for catalysis: the latter binding energy is only expressed at the
transition state for the catalyzed reaction, and favors a large turnover
number kcat.[9−12] The use of phosphodianion binding
energy for enzyme activation avoids full expression of the large substrate
binding energy at the Michaelis complex, and the possibility of effectively
irreversible, strongly rate-determining, ligand binding.[10,13]Orotidine 5′-monophosphate decarboxylase (OMPDC) employs
no metal ions or other cofactors, but yet effects an enormous stabilization
of the transition state for the chemically very difficult decarboxylation
of orotidine 5′-monophosphate (OMP) to give uridine 5′-monophosphate
(UMP),[14−18] by a stepwise mechanism through a UMP carbanion reaction intermediate
(Scheme 1).[4,19−23] OMPDC provides a large 31 kcal/mol stabilization of the transition
state for the decarboxylation of OMP,[15] and binds this transition state with a much higher affinity than
substrate OMP, whose ground-state complex with OMPDC is stabilized
by only 8 kcal/mol.[24]
Scheme 1
Binding interactions
between OMPDC and the phosphodianion of OMP
provide 12 of the 31 kcal/mol stabilization of the reaction transition
state.[5] These interactions do not simply
anchor OMP to OMPDC, because the covalent connection between the phosphodianion
and the pyrimidine ring is not needed to observe enzyme activation
by dianions. This was shown by the estimated 570 000-fold increase
in the rate of OMPDC-catalyzed decarboxylation of the truncated substrate
1-(β-d-erythrofuranosyl)orotic acid (EO, Scheme 2A) for a reaction activated by 1.0 M phosphite dianion
(HPi).[5] This corresponds to
an 8 kcal/mol stabilization of the transition state for the decarboxylation
reaction by the HPi piece, two-thirds of the 12 kcal/mol
intrinsic phosphodianion binding energy.[5] The binding of HPi to OMPDC results in a 60 000-fold
increase in the second-order rate constant for OMPDC-catalyzed decarboxylation
of EO from (kcat/Km)E = 0.026 M–1 s–1 to (kcat/Km)E•HPi = 1600 M–1 s–1.[5] This corresponds to a 60 000-fold
higher affinity (eq 1 for Scheme 2B) of HPi for binding to the transition state complex
[E·EO]⧧ (Kd⧧) as compared to the free
enzyme (Kd). Binding interactions between
OMPDC and HPi also provide a large 6 kcal/mol stabilization
of the transition state for deprotonation of the truncated substrate
1-(β-d-erythrofuranosyl)5-fluorouracil (FEU) in D2O.[4,25]
Scheme 2
The strong binding of 6-hydroxyuridine
5′-monophosphate
(BMP) to OMPDC induces a protein conformational change (Figure 1).[26] This includes closure
of the phosphodianion gripper loop (Pro202–Val220) and pyrimidine
umbrella (Glu152–Thr165) over the inhibitor, which locks BMP
in a protein cage.[27] Figure 2 shows interactions of the ligand phosphodianion with the
amide side chain of Gln215, the phenol side chain of Tyr217, the guanidine
side chain of Arg235, which sits on the protein surface adjacent to
the gripper loop (Figure 1) and functions cooperatively
with the loop side chains in activating OMPDC for catalysis,[28] and with backbone amides from Gly234 and Arg235.
We are interested in understanding the role of flexible loops in enzyme
catalysis,[12] and consider here the mechanism
by which ionic and hydrogen-bonding interactions of side chains from
the gripper loop, and Arg235, with the phosphodianion of OMP, or with
HPi, are utilized in stabilization of the transition state
for OMPDC-catalyzed decarboxylation of OMP, deprotonation of UMP,
and the corresponding reactions of the phosphodianion truncated substrates
EO and FEU,[4,23,25,28−34] respectively, at a site 10 Å distant from the gripper loop.
The binding of HPi to OMPDC is scarcely detectable, so
that the dianion binding energy is not expressed at the OMPDC·HPi complex, but rather provides strong stabilization of the
transition state for OMPDC-catalyzed decarboxylation of truncated
substrates (eq 1). We have proposed that most
or all of the 8 kcal/mol binding energy of HPi is utilized
to drive an uphill change in enzyme conformation, which activates
OMPDC for catalysis of decarboxylation.[10]
Figure 1
Space-filling
models that show the open form of unliganded OMPDC
from yeast on the left (PDB entry 1DQW), and the complex to 6-hydroxyuridine
5′-monophosphate on the right (PDB entry 1DQX). Two loops (colored)
act to trap the ligand at the enzyme active site. The phosphodianion
gripper loop (Pro202–Val220), on the left-hand side, and the
pyrimidine umbrella (Glu152–Thr165), on the right-hand side,
of each structure close over and trap the ligand in a cage at the
enzyme active site. The guanidine side chain of R235, at the base
of the phosphodianion gripper loop, is shaded green.
Figure 2
X-ray crystal
structure (PDB entry 1DQX) of yeast OMPDC in a complex with 6-hydroxyuridine
5′-monophosphate. This structure shows the important interactions
of Gln215, Tyr217, and Arg235 side chains from the phosphodianion
gripper loop with the ligand phosphodianion. Hydrogen bonds to the
Gly234 and Arg235 backbone amides are also shown. Reprinted with permission
from ref (28). Copyright
2012 American Chemical Society.
Space-filling
models that show the open form of unliganded OMPDC
from yeast on the left (PDB entry 1DQW), and the complex to 6-hydroxyuridine
5′-monophosphate on the right (PDB entry 1DQX). Two loops (colored)
act to trap the ligand at the enzyme active site. The phosphodianion
gripper loop (Pro202–Val220), on the left-hand side, and the
pyrimidine umbrella (Glu152–Thr165), on the right-hand side,
of each structure close over and trap the ligand in a cage at the
enzyme active site. The guanidine side chain of R235, at the base
of the phosphodianion gripper loop, is shaded green.We previously reported the effects of all single
(Q215A, R235A,
and Y217F), double (Q215A/Y217F, Q215A/R235A, R235A/Y217F), and triple
(Q215A/R235A/Y217F) mutations of amino acid residues that interact
with the phosphodianion of OMP (Figure 2),
on the kinetic parameters for OMPDC-catalyzed reactions of the substrate
pieces EO and HPi.[28] Single
mutations result in <3-fold decreases in (kcat/Km)E (Scheme 2B) for the catalyzed reaction of the truncated substrate
EO, and large decreases in the third-order rate constant for enzyme
activation by HPi.[28] This shows
that interactions between OMPDC and HPi have the sole function
of activating OMPDC for catalysis of decarboxylation of EO.X-ray crystal
structure (PDB entry 1DQX) of yeastOMPDC in a complex with 6-hydroxyuridine
5′-monophosphate. This structure shows the important interactions
of Gln215, Tyr217, and Arg235 side chains from the phosphodianion
gripper loop with the ligand phosphodianion. Hydrogen bonds to the
Gly234 and Arg235 backbone amides are also shown. Reprinted with permission
from ref (28). Copyright
2012 American Chemical Society.We report here the effect of these same mutations on the
kinetic
parameters kcat and Km for OMPDC-catalyzed decarboxylation of OMP. The activating
nature of enzyme–phosphodianion interactions for catalysis
of decarboxylation of the physiological substrate OMP was not detected by standard methods of mechanistic analyses, including
X-ray crystallographic analysis, but may be inferred from the results
of our experiments using the substrate pieces EO and HPi. We focus on a model that connects the easily quantified activation
of OMPDC-catalyzed decarboxylation of a truncated substrate EO by phosphite dianion, with the cryptic activation of OMPDC-catalyzed
decarboxylation of OMP by the substrate phosphodianion.
We report an unprecedented context dependence of the effect of these
single, double, and triple mutations on kcat and Km for OMPDC-catalyzed decarboxylation
of OMP, which provides compelling support for a model where the phosphodianion
binding interactions are utilized to drive an activating change in
the conformation of OMPDC.
Experimental Section
Sodium phosphite (dibasic, pentahydrate), 3-(N-morpholino)propanesulfonic acid (MOPS, ≥99.5%), and ammonium
acetate (≥99%) were purchased from Fluka. Water was from a
Milli-Q Academic purification system. All other chemicals were reagent
grade or better and were used without further purification. The trisodium
salt of orotidine 5′-monophosphate (99%) was prepared by adaptation
of published enzymatic methods,[35] from
orotate and phosphoribosylpyrophosphate.[25] This synthesis gave OMP that contained small amounts of ammonium
bicarbonate, which was removed as described in an earlier publication.[25] Solution pH was determined at 25 °C using
an Orion model 720A pH meter equipped with a radiometer pHC4006-9
combination electrode that was standardized at pH 7.00 and 10.00 at
25 °C. Stock solutions of OMP were prepared in water, and the
concentration of OMP was determined from the absorbance at 267 nm
using ε = 9430 M–1 cm–1 of
a small aliquot diluted with 0.1 M HCl.[36]
Wild-Type
and Mutant Forms of OMPDC
The plasmid pScODC-15b
containing the gene encoding OMPDC from Saccharomyces
cerevisiae with a N-terminal His6-tag was
available from previous studies.[31,33] In all cases,
the protein sequence differs from the published sequence for wild-type
yeastOMPDC by the following mutations: S2H,[37] C155S,[38] A160S, and N267D.[37] This sequence is the same as that observed in
the published crystal structure of wild-type yeastOMPDC,[26] except for the C155S mutation, which was introduced
to enhance the protein stability.[38] The
S2H, C155S, A160S, and N267D mutations do not cause a significant
change in the kinetic parameters for wild-type OMPDC.Site-directed
mutagenesis on pScODC-15b was carried out using the QuikChange II
kit. The procedures for the preparation of the Q215A,[33] R235A,[34] Y217F,[28] Q215A/Y217F,[28] Q215A/R235A,[28] Y217F/R235A,[28] and
Q215A/Y217F/R235A[28] mutants were described
in earlier work. In all cases, the N-terminal-His6 or -His10 tag was removed by the action of thrombin (1 unit/mg mutant
OMPDC) at room temperature for ca. 16 h, as described in the Supporting
Information to ref (33). Wild-type and mutant forms of OMPDC were stored at −80 °C.
The OMPDC was defrosted and dialyzed at 4 °C against 10 mM MOPS
(50% free base) at pH 7.1 and 100 mM NaCl. The concentration of stock
solutions of wild-type and mutant forms of OMPDC was determined from
the absorbance at 280 nm and the extinction coefficient, which was
calculated using the ProtParam tool available on the ExPASy server.[39,40] A value of ε = 29 900 M–1 cm–1 was determined for wild-type and most mutants of
OMPDC, except mutants that contain the Y217F substitution, for which
a value of ε = 28 400 M–1 cm–1 was determined.
Enzyme Assays
The decarboxylation
of OMP was monitored
spectrophotometrically by following the decrease in absorbance at
279, 290, 295, or 300 nm [Δε, λ; −2400 M
cm–1, 279 nm; −1620 M cm–1, 290 nm; −842 M s–1, 295 nm; −344
M cm–1, 300 nm]. Care was taken to work at a wavelength
where the initial absorbance for OMP is ≤2.0. The following
wavelengths were monitored for reactions at different concentrations
of OMP: [OMP] ≤ 0.08 mM, 279 nm; [OMP] = 0.1–0.3 mM,
290 nm; [OMP] = 0.3–0.8 mM, 295 nm; [OMP] ≥ 1 mM, 300
nm. Assays for OMPDC-catalyzed decarboxylation of OMP were conducted
at 25 °C and pH 7.1 (30 mM MOPS) and at constant ionic strength,
which was maintained with NaCl. The initial velocity v (M s–1), for OMPDC-catalyzed decarboxylation of
OMP (0.05–2.5 mM), was determined by monitoring the decrease
in absorbance at the chosen wavelength for the decarboxylation of
5–10% total OMP. Values of kcat and Km were obtained from the nonlinear
least-squares fits of six or more values of v/[E]
(s–1) to the Michaelis–Menten equation.
Results
Figure 3 shows plots of v/[E] against [OMP] for decarboxylation catalyzed by the
Q215A/Y217F
(Figure 3A) and Q215A/R235A (Figure 3B) mutants of OMPDC at 25 °C, pH 7.1 (30 mM
MOPS), and different ionic strengths (NaCl). The solid lines in Figure 3 show the nonlinear least-squares fit of these experimental
data to the Michaelis–Menten equation. The values of kcat, Km, and kcat/Km for decarboxylation
of OMP catalyzed by mutant forms of OMPDC obtained from these fits
are reported in Table 1. Table 1 also reports values of kcat, Km, and kcat/Km for decarboxylation of OMP catalyzed by the
Y217F mutant of OMPDC [data not shown] and for the R235A and Q215A
mutant enzymes reported in earlier work.[33,34]
Figure 3
Dependence
of v/[E] for decarboxylation of OMP
catalyzed by mutant forms of OMPDC on the concentration of OMP for
reactions at 25 °C, pH 7.1 (30 mM MOPS) and at different ionic
strengths (NaCl). (A) Q215A/Y217F OMPDC: (●) I = 0.105; (▲) I = 0.050. (B) Q215A/R235A:
(●) I = 0.105; (B) (▲) I = 0.050.
Table 1
Effect
of Mutations of Phosphodianion
Gripper Amino Acid Residues on the Kinetic Parameters for OMPDC-Catalyzed
Decarboxylation of OMPa
OMPDC
I
kcat (s–1)b
Km (M)b
kcat/Km (M–1 s–1)
wild
type
0.105
15
1.4 × 10–6
1.1 × 107
Q215Ac
0.105
24 ± 1
(0.94 ± 0.09) × 10–4
2.6 × 105
Y217F
0.105
20 ± 1
(1.1 ± 0.15) × 10–4
1.8 × 105
R235Ad
0.105
1.0
(1.1 ± 0.15) × 10–3
910
Q215A/Y217Fe
0.105
4.8 ± 0.25
(1.4 ± 0.24) × 10–3
3.4 × 103
0.05
5.0 ± 0.32
(0.29 ± 0.04) × 10–3
1.7 × 104
Q215A/R235Af
0.105
0.020 ± 0.02
(1.4 ± 0.1) × 10–3
14
0.05
0.019 ± 0.05
(3.5 ± 0.3) × 10–4
54
Y217F/R235Ag
0.105
0.11 ± 0.016
(27.1 ± 4.4) × 10–3
4.1
0.075
0.11 ± 0.016
(12.9 ± 2.1) × 10–3
8.5
0.05
0.11 ± 0.016
(6.1 ± 1.1) × 10–3
18
triple mutanth
0.105
(4.8 ± 0.8) × 10–4
(12.9 ± 2.4) × 10–3
0.037
0.05
(4.8 ± 0.8) × 10–4
(2.2 ± 0.5) × 10–3
0.22
For reactions at
pH 7.1 (30 mM MOPS),
25 °C, and constant ionic strength (NaCl).
The quoted errors are the standard
deviations obtained from the nonlinear least-squares fits of data
from Figures 3 and 4 to the Michaelis–Menten equation.
Data from ref (33).
Data
from ref (34).
Data from Figure 3A.
Data from Figure 3B.
Data
from Figure 4A.
Data from Figure 4B.
Figure 4 shows plots of v/[E] against [OMP] for decarboxylation catalyzed by the Y217F/R235A
(Figure 4A) and Q215A/Y217F/R235A (Figure 4B) mutants of OMPDC at 25 °C, pH 7.1 (30 mM
MOPS), and different ionic strengths (NaCl). The solid lines in Figure 4 show the nonlinear least-squares fit of the experimental
data to the Michaelis–Menten equation. The kinetic parameters
obtained from the fits of these plot are listed in Table 1. The deviations from a linear dependence of velocity
on [OMP] for Figure 4A and B are consistent
with the accumulation of a Michaelis complex, but the curvature is
small and the values of Km obtained from
the fits of the data to the Michaelis–Menten equation are significantly
larger than the highest concentration of OMP used in the determination
of Km. Consequently, the uncertainty in
the values of the kinetic parameters determined for decarboxylation
catalyzed by the Y217F/R235A and Q215A/Y217F/R235A mutants is large.
Figure 4
Dependence of v/[E] for decarboxylation
of OMP
catalyzed by mutant forms of OMPDC on the concentration of OMP for
reactions at 25 °C, pH 7.1 (30 mM MOPS) and at different ionic
strengths (NaCl). (A) Y217F/R235A: (●) I =
0.105; (■) I = 0.075; (▲) I = 0.050. (B) Q215A/Y217F/R235A: (●) I =
0.105; (▲) I = 0.050.
Dependence
of v/[E] for decarboxylation of OMP
catalyzed by mutant forms of OMPDC on the concentration of OMP for
reactions at 25 °C, pH 7.1 (30 mM MOPS) and at different ionic
strengths (NaCl). (A) Q215A/Y217F OMPDC: (●) I = 0.105; (▲) I = 0.050. (B) Q215A/R235A:
(●) I = 0.105; (B) (▲) I = 0.050.For reactions at
pH 7.1 (30 mM MOPS),
25 °C, and constant ionic strength (NaCl).The quoted errors are the standard
deviations obtained from the nonlinear least-squares fits of data
from Figures 3 and 4 to the Michaelis–Menten equation.Data from ref (33).Data
from ref (34).Data from Figure 3A.Data from Figure 3B.Data
from Figure 4A.Data from Figure 4B.Dependence of v/[E] for decarboxylation
of OMP
catalyzed by mutant forms of OMPDC on the concentration of OMP for
reactions at 25 °C, pH 7.1 (30 mM MOPS) and at different ionic
strengths (NaCl). (A) Y217F/R235A: (●) I =
0.105; (■) I = 0.075; (▲) I = 0.050. (B) Q215A/Y217F/R235A: (●) I =
0.105; (▲) I = 0.050.
Discussion
The value of kcat/Km = 1.8 × 105 M–1 s–1 for the Y217F mutant is 70-fold
larger than kcat/Km = 2.5 ×
103 M–1 s–1 for the
Y217A mutant determined under similar reaction conditions.[41,42] A phenyl ring at position 217 is therefore required for the robust
functioning of the dianion gripper loop. We suggest that the aromatic
ring serves to optimally position the side chains of Q215 and R235
about the ligand phosphodianion, at a tightly packed enzyme active
site, and that shifts in these side chains at the Y217A mutant result
in a reduction in their stabilizing interactions with the phosphodianion
at the transition state for OMPDC-catalyzed decarboxylation reactions.By comparison, the Y16F mutation of ketosteroid isomerase (KSI)
results in 100 000-fold reduction in kcat/Km for enzyme-catalyzed isomerization
of 5(10)-estrene-3,17-dione, while the structurally less more conservative
Y16S mutation results in a only a 100-fold reduction in kcat/Km.[43] The phenol side chain at position 16 of wild-type KSI is
thought to form a stabilizing hydrogen bond to the dienolate intermediate
of the KSI-catalyzed reaction. Spectroscopic and structural studies
on KSI suggest that the Y16F mutation results in unfavorable interactions
beyond the loss of a stabilizing phenol–dienolatehydrogen
bond.[43]Figures 3 and 4,
and Table 1 show that the increase in ionic
strength from 0.050 to 0.10 results in similar increases in the value
for Km, but has little effect on kcat for the decarboxylation of OMP catalyzed
by several mutants of OMPDC. This is in agreement with our earlier
report that an increase in ionic strength (I) from
0.020–0.10 results in an increase in Km = 0.16 × 10–3 M to Km = 1.1 × 10–3 M, but little change
in kcat for decarboxylation of OMP catalyzed
by R235A mutant OMPDC.[25] A related increase
in Km with increasing I, observed for the triosephosphate isomerase (TIM) catalyzed isomerization
of glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dianion,[44] has been attributed to a decreasing activity coefficient for the
substrate dianion at increasing ionic strength.[45]
Phosphodianion Binding Energy for Side Chains of OMPDC
The intrinsic phosphodianion binding energy ((ΔGPi∓)intWT) is defined
as the dianion binding energy utilized in stabilization of the transition
state for the wild-type OMPDC-catalyzed reaction. It is calculated
from the ratio of second-order rate constants for wild-type OMPDC-catalyzed
decarboxylation of OMP and the phosphodianion truncated substrate
EO.[5,13,46,47] An important goal of this work was to determine the
contribution (ΔGPi∓)intX of the individual gripper side chains
to (ΔGPi∓)intWT. Scheme 3 compares
the kinetic parameters for decarboxylation of the whole substrate
OMP (Table 1) and the truncated substrate EO[28] catalyzed by wild-type OMPDC and a representative
mutant. The intrinsic phosphodianion binding energy for wild-type
((ΔGPi∓)intWT) and mutant ((ΔGPi∓)intWT–X) OMPDC
is calculated from the ratio of the values of kcat/Km for the respective enzyme-catalyzed
decarboxylation of whole and truncated substrates. The difference
between (ΔGPi∓)intWT and (ΔGPi∓)intWT–X is
equal to (ΔGPi∓)intX, the contribution of the excised side chain
to the phosphodianion binding energy for wild-type OMPDC. Table 2 reports values of (ΔGPi∓)int for wild type and different mutants of OMPDC, and(ΔGPi∓)intX for the
phosphodianion gripper side chains, calculated from the effect of
the mutation on (ΔGPi∓)intWT.
Scheme 3
Table 2
Intrinsic Phosphodianion Binding Energies
for Wild Type and Mutant Forms of OMPDC and the Effects of Mutations
on the Dianion Binding Energya
OMPDC
(kcat/Km)OMP/(kcat/Km)EOb
(ΔGPi∓)intc (kcal/mol)
(ΔGPi∓)intXd (kcal/mol)
wild type
4.2 × 108
11.7
Q215A
2.3 × 107
10.0
1.7
Y217F
1.5 × 107
9.8
1.9
R235A
3.5 × 104
6.2
5.5
Q215A/Y217F
7.4 × 105
8.0
3.7
Q215A/R235A
3300
4.8
6.9
Y217F/R235A
410
3.6
8.1
Q215A/Y217F/R235A
12
1.5
10.2
For OMPDC-catalyzed
decarboxylation
at 25 °C, pH 7.1 (30 mM MOPS), and ionic strength of 0.105 (NaCl).
Ratio of second-order rate
constants
for OMPDC-catalyzed decarboxylation of OMP (Table 1) and EO (ref (28)).
RT ln((kcat/Km)OMP/(kcat/Km)EO).
The difference
between the 11.7
kcal/mol intrinsic phosphodianion binding energy for wild-type OMPDC
and the respective mutant of OMPDC.
The side chains of Q215, Y217, and R235 provide 1.7, 1.9,
and 5.5
kcal/mol stabilization, respectively, of the transition state for
OMPDC-catalyzed decarboxylation of OMP (Table 2). Each of these apparent interaction energies underestimates the
true stabilization of the transition state by ca. 0.3 kcal/mol per
side chain. This is because the rate of the wild-type OMPDC-catalyzed
reaction is partly limited by substrate binding, so that the side-chain
interactions are not fully expressed at the “effective”
rate-determining transition state.[24] We
estimate a total 10 kcal/mol stabilization of the transition state
by interactions of the gripper side chains with the substrate phosphodianion,
which is ca. 1 kcal/mol larger that the sum of the three interactions
energies (9.1 kcal/mol). A similar 10.2 kcal/mol total interaction
energy is estimated (Table 2) from the difference
in the intrinsic phosphodianion binding energy for wild-type OMPDC
(11.7 kcal/mol) and the Q215A/Y217F/R235A mutant (1.5 kcal/mol). The
ca. 2 kcal/mol intrinsic dianion binding energy observed for the triple
mutant is consistent with a small stabilization of the decarboxylation
transition state by the hydrogen bonds from the backbone amides from
G234 and R235 to the substrate phosphodianion (Figure 2).For OMPDC-catalyzed
decarboxylation
at 25 °C, pH 7.1 (30 mM MOPS), and ionic strength of 0.105 (NaCl).Ratio of second-order rate
constants
for OMPDC-catalyzed decarboxylation of OMP (Table 1) and EO (ref (28)).RT ln((kcat/Km)OMP/(kcat/Km)EO).The difference
between the 11.7
kcal/mol intrinsic phosphodianion binding energy for wild-type OMPDC
and the respective mutant of OMPDC.Scheme 4 and Table 2 show that the 12 kcal/mol transition state stabilization
by interactions
between the phosphodianion and OMPDC represents the sum of a 6 kcal/mol
electrostatic interaction from the cationic side chain of R235 and
(2 + 2 + 2) = 6 kcal/mol interactions from hydrogen bonds to side
chains from Q215 and Y217 and backbone amide −NH– from
G234 and R235. Similar analyses of the effect of site-directed mutations
on catalysis by 3-ketosteroid isomerase,[48] and tryosyl-tRNA synthetase,[49,50] have shown that substantial stabilization of the transition states
for these enzymatic reactions is obtained from the total, additive,
effect of networks of individual stabilizing hydrogen-bonding/electrostatic
interactions.
Scheme 4
We conclude that the large intrinsic phosphodianion
binding energy
for OMPDC is obtained from the additive contribution of the network
of hydrogen-bonding and electrostatic interactions shown in Scheme 4. We likewise propose that the entire 31 kcal/mol
transition state stabilization for OMPDC represents the sum of the
binding interactions between the phosphodianion, ribosyl, and pyrimidine
fragments of the decarboxylation transition state, which is mimicked
by the complex between OMPDC and the transition state analogue BMP
(Scheme 4). In other words, the structure of
the OMPDC·transition state complex is sufficient to provide a
full rationalization of the enzymatic rate acceleration. The conformational
change triggered by substrate binding (Figure 1) defines the pathway followed on proceeding from unliganded OMPDC
to the active closed enzyme. This is a critical step in the catalytic
cycle that deserves close study, to determine the mechanism by which
the change in enzyme structure activates OMPDC for catalysis. However,
the characterization of the pathway for this conformational change
is incidental to the development of an understanding of the magnitude
of the stabilization of the decarboxylation transition state, which
is determined by the barrier to transition state formation after completion
of the enzyme conformational change.There is strong evidence,
for triosephosphate isomerase (TIM)-catalyzed
isomerization of d-glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate to dihydroxyacetone
phosphate, that enzyme activation results from the utilization of
the dianion binding energy to lock TIM into an active conformation,
which is present at a low fractional concentration.[2,11,51,52] This mechanism
is illustrated by Scheme 5 for activation of
OMPDC by phosphite dianion, where KC ≪
1 for the protein conformational change. The open form of OMPDC (EO) is disordered, due to the conformational flexibility
of the phosphodianion and pyrimidine gripper loops (Figure 1), and the phosphodianion binding energy is utilized,
in part, to organize/position the catalytic side chains at the closed
enzyme E.[53,54] The closure of these loops over enzyme-bound OMP requires the sampling
of different protein conformations.[12,55] This loop
closure may partly limit the magnitude of the second-order rate constant kcat/Km for wild-type
OMPDC-catalyzed decarboxylation of OMP and 5-fluoro-OMP (Table 1).[24,29,31,35,56]
Scheme 5
Reactions of the Whole Substrate and the Substrate in Pieces
A key element of the proposal illustrated by Scheme 5 is that the phosphodianion binding energy is utilized exclusively
to drive an unfavorable protein conformational change, but that the
dianion does not interact directly with the transition state for the
decarboxylation reaction, or affect the transition state structure.[57] The barrier for conversion of OMPDC and OMP
to the transition state for enzyme-catalyzed decarboxylation [(ΔG⧧)OMP] is defined by the second-order
rate constant (kcat/Km)OMP, while the barrier to formation of the
transition state for OMPDC-catalyzed decarboxylation of the pieces
EO + HPi [(ΔG⧧)EO+HPi] is defined by the third-order rate constant kcat/KHPiKEO (Scheme 6). Figure 5 presents the linear logarithmic free energy relationship
between these barriers for wild-type and mutant OMPDC-catalyzed reactions
of the whole substrate OMP and the substrate pieces EO + HPi. The unit slope of this correlation (1.05 ± 0.08) requires
that these mutations result in the same destabilization of the two
transition states for the catalyzed reactions of the whole substrate
and substrate pieces, because they exhibit strikingly similar interactions
with phosphodianion gripper side chains, and by this criterion are
remarkably similar. This is consistent with our proposal that dianion
binding energy is utilized for the sole purpose of locking OMPDC into
an active conformation.
Scheme 6
Figure 5
Linear free energy relationship, with slope 1.05 ± 0.08, between
the second-order rate constant [log(kcat/Km)OMP] for wild type and
mutant OMPDC-catalyzed decarboxylation of OMP and the corresponding
third-order rate constant [log(kcat/KHPiKEO)] for the
enzyme-catalyzed reactions of the substrate pieces EO and HPi. The residues that interact with the phosphodianion and pyrimidine
ring are shown using green and red print, respectively. Literature
data are used for the reactions catalyzed by S154A and the S154A/Q215A
mutants of OMPDC.[33]
The unit slope for Figure 5 reflects the
constant difference in the activation barriers for the reactions of
the whole substrate OMP and the pieces EO + HPi: ΔΔG⧧ = (4.5 ± 0.5) kcal/mol (Scheme 6). This difference is due largely or entirely to
the entropic advantage to the binding of the transition state for
decarboxylation of OMP compared with the transition state in pieces.[58] A larger value of ΔΔG⧧ = 6.6 kcal/mol has been determined in a related
study of the effect of site-directed mutations of TIM on the kinetic
parameters for enzyme-catalyzed isomerization of the whole substrate d-glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate and the substrate pieces [1-13C]-glycolaldehyde and HPi.[57]Linear free energy relationship, with slope 1.05 ± 0.08, between
the second-order rate constant [log(kcat/Km)OMP] for wild type and
mutant OMPDC-catalyzed decarboxylation of OMP and the corresponding
third-order rate constant [log(kcat/KHPiKEO)] for the
enzyme-catalyzed reactions of the substrate pieces EO and HPi. The residues that interact with the phosphodianion and pyrimidine
ring are shown using green and red print, respectively. Literature
data are used for the reactions catalyzed by S154A and the S154A/Q215A
mutants of OMPDC.[33]We conclude that there is a sharp delineation in the function
of
the catalytic and phosphatedianion binding domains of OMPDC. The
catalytic domain carries out decarboxylation of OMP and EO and provides
an impressive (31 – 12) = 19 kcal/mol transition state stabilization
for the latter substrate. This transition state stabilization is largely
independent of any contribution from the dianion binding site, as
shown by the similar second-order rate constants for wild type (kcat/Km = 0.026 M–1 s–1) and Q215A/Y217F/R235A triple
mutant (kcat/Km = 0.0030 M–1 s–1) OMPDC-catalyzed
decarboxylation of EO.[28] Dianion binding
promotes the chemistry at the distant catalytic domain by providing
binding energy, which functions as a “glue” to lock
the enzyme into an active conformation. This domain shows a high discrimination
between structurally homologous dianions, which has been rigorously
characterized for a series of inorganic tetrahedral dianions.[59]
Interactions Between Protein Side Chains
Point mutations
of wild-type OMPDC result in only small changes in kcat/Km for decarboxylation
of the phosphodianion truncated substrate EO (ΔΔGX∓)EO,[28] which are reflected
(eq 3) here as small (≤0.5 kcal/mol)
differences between the effect of the mutations on the activation
barrier for OMPDC-catalyzed decarboxylation of OMP, (ΔΔGX∓)OMP (Table 3), and the intrinsic
side-chain phosphodianion binding energy, (ΔGPi∓)intX (Table 2).
Table 3
Effect of Mutations on the Activation
Barrier (ΔG⧧)OMP for Decarboxylation of OMP Catalyzed by Wild-Type OMPDC, and by
Previously Mutated OMPDCa
(ΔΔGX∓)OMP (kcal/mol)b
mutated OMPDC
Q215A
Y217F
R235A
∑(ΔΔGX∓)OMPc
wild type
2.2
2.4
5.6
10.2
single mutantd
2.5 (R235A)
2.5 (Q215A)
5.8 (Q215A)
10.8
2.3 (Y217F)
3.2
(R235A)
6.3 (Y217F)
11.8
double mutant
2.8
3.5
6.8
13.4
For OMPDC-catalyzed decarboxylation
at 25 °C, pH 7.1 (30 mM MOPS), and ionic strength of 0.105 (NaCl).
The effect of the point mutation
on (ΔG⧧)OMP for
decarboxylation of OMP catalyzed by the precursor enzyme, calculated
from the ratio of values of kcat/Km for the precursor and mutant enzymes.
The sum of the effects of the Q215A,
Y217F, and R235A mutations on (ΔΔGX∓)OMP.
The enzyme that was mutated
is given
in parentheses.
A closer examination of the
effect
of these mutations on (ΔΔGX∓)OMP (Table 3) provides insight into the nature
of the interactions between the gripper side chains (Figure 2).[60,61] Figure 6 was constructed for mutations of the three amino acid side chains
of OMPDC that interact with the phosphodianion, using data from Table 3. Figure 6 and Table 3 show that the effect of a point mutation of residue
X on (ΔΔGX∓)OMP is approximately
the same when the mutation is carried out at wild-type OMPDC, singly
mutated, or doubly mutated forms of OMPDC. We conclude that the interactions
between the phosphodianion gripper side chains are small, but not
negligible.
Figure 6
A triple mutant box showing
the effects, in kcal/mol, of single
amino acid mutations on (ΔG⧧)OMP for reactions catalyzed by wild-type OMPDC (black
values), by single mutants of OMPDC (red values), and by double mutants
of OMPDC (green values). These effects are reported as (ΔΔGX∓)OMP for the mutations, calculated from the ratio of the
kinetic parameters kcat/Km for precursor and mutated OMPDC-catalyzed decarboxylation
of OMP, which are reported in Table 3.
Most of the pairwise interaction energies, which
can be calculated
following procedures described by Horovitz and Fersht, are ≤0.3
kcal/mol.[61] However, the effect of the
Y217F or R235A mutations on decarboxylation catalyzed by wild-type
OMPDC ((ΔΔGX∓)OMP = 2.4 and 5.6
kcal/mol, respectively) is ca. 0.8 kcal/mol smaller than the effect
of the corresponding mutations on decarboxylation catalyzed by singly
mutated OMPDC ((ΔΔGX∓)OMP = 3.2 and
6.3 kcal/mol). About 0.3 kcal/mol of this difference results because
chemistry is partly rate determining for wild-type OMPDC, but fully
rate determining for the relevant mutant enzymes (see above). Even
after a 0.3 kcal/mol correction, the effect of the second mutation
remains larger than for the initial mutation of wild-type OMPDC. We
attribute this difference to a destabilizing interaction between the
side chains of Y217 and R235 at wild-type OMPDC, which is relieved
at either single mutant.We note the compact arrangement of
gripper side chains around the
phosphodianion at wild-type OMPDC (Figure 2) and propose that the loss of the stabilizing interaction between
the phosphodianion and the side chains of R235 or Y217 at the single
mutants is partly offset by the relief of a small destabilizing steric
interaction between the two side chains. By comparison, the effect
of any single mutation at wild-type OMPDC is 0.6–1.2 kcal/mol
smaller than the effect of the same mutation of the previously doubly
mutated enzyme (Table 3). For example, (ΔΔGX∓)OMP = 5.6 and 6.8 kcal/mol, respectively, for an R235A
mutation at wild-type OMPDC and at the Q215A/Y217F double mutant.
This difference is also consistent with steric crowding of the amino
acid side chains around the phosphodianion of wild-type OMPDC (Figure 2), which is relieved by truncation of two amino
acid side chains.For OMPDC-catalyzed decarboxylation
at 25 °C, pH 7.1 (30 mM MOPS), and ionic strength of 0.105 (NaCl).The effect of the point mutation
on (ΔG⧧)OMP for
decarboxylation of OMP catalyzed by the precursor enzyme, calculated
from the ratio of values of kcat/Km for the precursor and mutant enzymes.The sum of the effects of the Q215A,
Y217F, and R235A mutations on (ΔΔGX∓)OMP.The enzyme that was mutated
is given
in parentheses.A triple mutant box showing
the effects, in kcal/mol, of single
amino acid mutations on (ΔG⧧)OMP for reactions catalyzed by wild-type OMPDC (black
values), by single mutants of OMPDC (red values), and by double mutants
of OMPDC (green values). These effects are reported as (ΔΔGX∓)OMP for the mutations, calculated from the ratio of the
kinetic parameters kcat/Km for precursor and mutated OMPDC-catalyzed decarboxylation
of OMP, which are reported in Table 3.
Mechanism for Dianion Activation
of OMPDC for Decarboxylation
of OMP
Interactions between OMPDC and HPi, or
the dianion of OMP, are utilized to drive a conformational change
that activates OMPDC for catalysis of decarboxylation of EO and OMP,
respectively.[10] The weak (Kd ≥ 0.1 M)[5] binding
of HPi to OMPDC (Scheme 5) requires
that essentially the entire 8 kcal/mol phosphite dianion binding energy
be utilized to drive the activating enzyme conformational change from EO to EC (Scheme 7). Tethering the two pieces in the whole substrate
OMP results in an increase in the dianion binding energy to 12 kcal/mol,
because of the anchoring effect of the attachment.[5,58] This
additional ca. 4 kcal/mol of dianion binding energy is available to
stabilize the Michaelis complex to OMP, while the same 8 kcal/mol
dianion binding energy as for phosphite dianion is needed to drive
the activating enzyme conformational change. This predicts that ca.
4 kcal/mol of the dianion binding energy for OMP will be expressed
in the value of the observed Michaelis constant and that the 8 kcal/mol
of binding energy utilized to drive the enzyme conformational change
will be expressed as an increase in (kcat)obs.
Scheme 7
Equations 4–6, derived for Scheme 7, show
the relationship
between the microscopic rate and equilibrium constants Kd, kcat, and Kc, and the observed kinetic parameters (kcat)obs and (Km)obs for OMPDC-catalyzed decarboxylation of OMP, where Kc is for the enzyme conformational change, Kd is for release of OMP from E, and kcat is for
turnover of E·OMP.[25] If the 12 kcal/mol intrinsic dianion binding
energy of OMP is divided between the 8 kcal/mol of binding energy
utilized to drive the enzyme conformational change and the 4 kcal/mol
expressed as stabilization of the Michaelis complex to OMP, then the
closure of OMPDC will be thermodynamically favorable for wild-type
OMPDC by 4 kcal/mol (Scheme 7A), so that (Kc ≫ 1), (kcat)obs ≈ kcat, and (Km)obs = Kd/Kc (eqs 4–6). The initial mutation of a gripper residue will
cause a decrease in Kc that will be expressed
as an increase in (Km)obs but
not (kcat)obs, and (Km)obs will increase until the Michaelis
complex is destabilized by ca. 4 kcal/mol and Kc = 1. Once Kc < 1, the enzyme
conformational change becomes a step on the pathway from the dominant
complex E·OMP to the decarboxylation
transition state (Scheme 7B), so that (kcat)obs ≈ kcatKc and (KM)obs≈ Kd (eqs 4–6). Further
mutations of gripper residues will now result in a decrease in (kcat)obs but not (Km)obs.This analysis predicts that effect of mutations on (Km)obs and (kcat)obs will depend upon the context of the mutation. The
mutation of any gripper residue at wild-type OMPDC will be expressed
on (Km)obs (Kc ≫ 1), but mutations of the same residue will
be expressed on (kcat)obs if
previous mutations have resulted in Kc < 1. The predicted context dependence of the effects of these
mutations on (kcat)obs and
(Km)obs is in good agreement
with the observed effects.(1) The Q215A and Y217F mutations
result in (60–70-fold)
increases in Km for decarboxylation of
OMP, and surprisingly small increases in kcat (Table 1). These changes are consistent with Kc ≫ 1 (eqs 4–6) for wild-type OMPDC, and a small increase in the
rate of product release, which limits the value for kcat.[24](2) The overall
effect of the R235A mutation is to destabilize
the rate-determining transition state for OMPDC-catalyzed decarboxylation
by 5.6 kcal/mol (Table 3). About 4 kcal/mol
of this effect is expressed as a 700-fold increase in Km to a limiting value of Km ≈ Kd = 1 mM, which corresponds
to a 4 kcal/mol destabilization of the Michaelis complex, when Kc ≪ 1. The remaining effect of this mutation
(1.6 kcal/mol) is expressed as a 15-fold decrease in kcat (Table 1).(3) The Q215A
mutation of wild-type OMPDC results mainly in an
increase in Km. However, the same mutation
at the R235A mutant has almost no effect on Km, which is at the limiting value of 1 mM (KC < 1, Scheme 7B). Now, almost
the entire effect of the Q215A mutation is expressed as a decrease
in kcat (Table 1).(4) The effects of the Q215A and Y217F single mutations
are expressed
as changes in Km, while the Q215A/Y217F
double mutation results in a limiting Km = 1 mM, and a decrease in the value of kcat to 4.8 s–1 (Table 1).We note that the values Km for the
Y217F/R235A double mutant and the Q215A/Y217F/R235A triple mutants
(Table 1) are larger than the value of Kd ≈ 1 mM, which we propose represents
the limiting affinity of wild-type E for OMP. These increases in Km may reflect small second-order effects of extensive mutations on
the stability of the unreactive E·OMP complex (Scheme 7). Finally, the
proposed limiting Kd of ∼1 mM for
binding of OMP to E (Scheme 7) is smaller than the Kd ≈ 100 mM estimated for the truncated substrate EO (Scheme 2A).[5] This is consistent
with stabilization of the E·OMP complex by nonproductive
binding interactions between mutated phosphodianion gripper loops
and the phosphodianion of OMP. Such nonproductive binding interactions
will result in equal increases in kcat and Km, but will not affect kcat/Km for OMPDC-catalyzed
decarboxylation.[62]This interpretation
of the results from Table 1 unifies the easily
quantified utilization of the 8 kcal/mol
intrinsic phosphite dianion binding energy in activation of OMPDC
for decarboxylation of a truncated substrate EO, and
the cryptic utilization of 8 kcal/mol of phosphodianion binding energy
in activation of OMPDC for decarboxylation of OMP (Scheme 7). In each case, 8 kcal/mol of dianion binding energy
is used to drive an activating change in the conformation of OMPDC
from E to E. This corresponds to the entire phosphite dianion
binding energy for activation of OMPDC-catalyzed decarboxylation of
EO. The larger 12 kcal/mol intrinsic dianion binding energy for OMP
is divided between the 4 kcal/mol expressed in the observed binding
constant (Km)obs, and the 8
kcal/mol that is utilized to drive the unfavorable conversion of inactive E·OMP to active E·OMP, and which is expressed as an
increase in (kcat)obs.
Summary
We conclude by reviewing what is known about the origin of the
extraordinary catalytic clout obtained from OMPDC–dianion interactions.[5](1) There is a fair agreement between the
total intrinsic dianion
binding energy and the sum of the contributing interactions of the
amino acid side chains determined in mutagenesis studies (Scheme 4). This shows that there are only small interactions
energies for the dianion gripper side chains (Figure 6).(2) There is little or no apparent requirement that
the binding
energy of gripper side chains be “wasted” in immobilizing
the rigid loop over the substrate phosphodianion.[32] Such an entropic penalty would be a minimum for point mutations
at wild-type OMPDC, because the remaining side chains would act to
hold the loop in a fixed conformation, and a maximum for point mutations
at double mutants to give the Q215A/Y217F/R235A triple mutant. By
contrast, point mutations of wild-type OMPDC result in a 0.6–1.2
kcal/mol (Table 3) smaller transition state
destabilization than the same point mutation at a double mutant, a
difference opposite of that expected if entropic effects were important.(3) The very small effect of mutations at the dianion gripper loop
on kcat/Km for decarboxylation of the truncated substrate EO shows that there
is little or no interaction between the amino acid side chains at
the dianion binding domain and the pyrimidine ring bound at the catalytic
domain.[28](4) The large effect of
mutations at the dianion gripper loop on kcat/KHPiKEO for
phosphite dianion activation of decarboxylation
of EO (Scheme 6) shows that loop dianion interactions
act to stabilize the decarboxylation transition state, in the absence
of a direct interaction between the loop and the reacting orotate
ring.[28](5) Closure of the dianion
gripper loop and the smaller movement
of the side chain of R235 is just one component of a global conformational
change of OMPDC, whose precise role in the catalysis of decarboxylation
of OMP remains to be fully determined. A critical element of this
enzyme conformational change is formation of a hydrogen bond between
the side chains of Ser154 and Gln215 (Scheme 4), which ensures cooperativity in the closure of the phosphodianion
gripper loop and the pyrimidine umbrella.[33](6) The enzyme conformational change is expected to result
in a
tightening of the interactions between OMPDC and the ribosyl and pyrimdine
substrate fragments (Scheme 4). It is therefore
important to characterize the interactions of these fragments with
OMPDC by an experimental protocol similar to that used to examine
the role of phosphodianion interactions in the OMPDC-catalyzed decarboxylation
reaction.(7) The separate catalytic and phosphodianion binding
domains at
OMPDC might be mimicked in the design of an active artificial protein
decarboxylase, by first designing a protein that catalyzes decarboxylation
at a solvent exposed cleft, and then adding to this protein flexible
loop(s), which fold over a nonreacting substrate fragment, such as
a phosphodianion, to tightly lock the substrate within a protein cage.[12,27] This strategy should result in a catalyst where the tight loop–substrate
interactions are expressed as a large turnover number kcat for the decarboxylation reaction.[10,13]
Authors: Tina L Amyes; Shonoi A Ming; Lawrence M Goldman; B McKay Wood; Bijoy J Desai; John A Gerlt; John P Richard Journal: Biochemistry Date: 2012-05-31 Impact factor: 3.162
Authors: Lisa S Mydy; Judith R Cristobal; Roberto D Katigbak; Paul Bauer; Archie C Reyes; Shina Caroline Lynn Kamerlin; John P Richard; Andrew M Gulick Journal: Biochemistry Date: 2019-01-31 Impact factor: 3.162
Authors: Bogdana Goryanova; Lawrence M Goldman; Shonoi Ming; Tina L Amyes; John A Gerlt; John P Richard Journal: Biochemistry Date: 2015-07-14 Impact factor: 3.162
Authors: Archie C Reyes; Xiang Zhai; Kelsey T Morgan; Christopher J Reinhardt; Tina L Amyes; John P Richard Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2015-01-20 Impact factor: 15.419