Literature DB >> 22144561

Need for standardization of 18F-FDG PET/CT for treatment response assessments.

Ronald Boellaard1.   

Abstract

Many factors affect standardized uptake values (SUVs) in (18)F-FDG PET/CT. The use of the SUV from a single PET scan in multicenter studies requires the standardization of (18)F-FDG PET/CT procedures. In the context of treatment response assessments (repeated PET scans), many factors may seem to have minor effects on percentage changes in SUVs, provided that imaging procedures are executed in a consistent manner for each subject. However, the use of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in a nonstandardized manner will result in unknown biases and reproducibilities of SUVs and SUV-based response measures. This article provides an overview of the need for standardization in relation to the specific use of SUVs and SUV changes in studies of treatment response assessments.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22144561     DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.110.085662

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  64 in total

Review 1.  Early interim PET scans in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: can there be consensus about standardized reporting, and can PET scans guide therapy choices?

Authors:  Rene-Olivier Casasnovas; Michel Meignan; Alina Berriolo-Riedinger; Emmanuel Itti; Damien Huglo; Corinne Haioun; Franck Morschhauser
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.952

2.  The engagement of FDG PET/CT image quality and harmonized quantification: from competitive to complementary.

Authors:  Ronald Boellaard
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  A novel approach to assess the treatment response using Gaussian random field in PET.

Authors:  Mengdie Wang; Ning Guo; Guangshu Hu; Georges El Fakhri; Hui Zhang; Quanzheng Li
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 4.  New techniques for assessing response after hypofractionated radiotherapy for lung cancer.

Authors:  Sarah A Mattonen; Kitty Huang; Aaron D Ward; Suresh Senan; David A Palma
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Performance evaluation of the Ingenuity TF PET/CT scanner with a focus on high count-rate conditions.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Kolthammer; Kuan-Hao Su; Anu Grover; Manoj Narayanan; David W Jordan; Raymond F Muzic
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 6.  Clinical oncologic applications of PET/MRI: a new horizon.

Authors:  Sasan Partovi; Andres Kohan; Christian Rubbert; Jose Luis Vercher-Conejero; Chiara Gaeta; Roger Yuh; Lisa Zipp; Karin A Herrmann; Mark R Robbin; Zhenghong Lee; Raymond F Muzic; Peter Faulhaber; Pablo R Ros
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-03-20

7.  FDG PET during radiochemotherapy is predictive of outcome at 1 year in non-small-cell lung cancer patients: a prospective multicentre study (RTEP2).

Authors:  Pierre Vera; Sandrine Mezzani-Saillard; Agathe Edet-Sanson; Jean-François Ménard; Romain Modzelewski; Sebastien Thureau; Marc-Etienne Meyer; Khadija Jalali; Stéphane Bardet; Delphine Lerouge; Claire Houzard; Françoise Mornex; Pierre Olivier; Guillaume Faure; Caroline Rousseau; Marc-André Mahé; Philippe Gomez; Isabelle Brenot-Rossi; Naji Salem; Bernard Dubray
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-02-22       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Staging the axilla in breast cancer patients with ¹⁸F-FDG PET: how small are the metastases that we can detect with new generation clinical PET systems?

Authors:  Dimitri Bellevre; Cécile Blanc Fournier; Odile Switsers; Audrey Emmanuelle Dugué; Christelle Levy; Djelila Allouache; Cédric Desmonts; Hubert Crouet; Jean-Marc Guilloit; Jean-Michel Grellard; Nicolas Aide
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-02-22       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  PET/CT-Based Response Evaluation in Cancer-a Systematic Review of Design Issues.

Authors:  Oke Gerke; Karen Ehlers; Edith Motschall; Poul Flemming Høilund-Carlsen; Werner Vach
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 3.488

10.  Measuring PET Spatial Resolution Using a Cylinder Phantom Positioned at an Oblique Angle.

Authors:  Martin A Lodge; Jeffrey P Leal; Arman Rahmim; John J Sunderland; Eric C Frey
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 10.057

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.