Literature DB >> 25868451

Precision and accuracy of clinical quantification of myocardial blood flow by dynamic PET: A technical perspective.

Jonathan B Moody1, Benjamin C Lee1, James R Corbett2,3, Edward P Ficaro1,2, Venkatesh L Murthy4,5.   

Abstract

A number of exciting advances in PET/CT technology and improvements in methodology have recently converged to enhance the feasibility of routine clinical quantification of myocardial blood flow and flow reserve. Recent promising clinical results are pointing toward an important role for myocardial blood flow in the care of patients. Absolute blood flow quantification can be a powerful clinical tool, but its utility will depend on maintaining precision and accuracy in the face of numerous potential sources of methodological errors. Here we review recent data and highlight the impact of PET instrumentation, image reconstruction, and quantification methods, and we emphasize (82)Rb cardiac PET which currently has the widest clinical application. It will be apparent that more data are needed, particularly in relation to newer PET technologies, as well as clinical standardization of PET protocols and methods. We provide recommendations for the methodological factors considered here. At present, myocardial flow reserve appears to be remarkably robust to various methodological errors; however, with greater attention to and more detailed understanding of these sources of error, the clinical benefits of stress-only blood flow measurement may eventually be more fully realized.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac PET/CT; Myocardial blood flow; Myocardial flow reserve; Rubidium-82

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25868451     DOI: 10.1007/s12350-015-0100-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN: 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


  107 in total

Review 1.  The challenge of detector designs for PET.

Authors:  Thomas K Lewellen
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 2.  Quantification of myocardial blood flow and flow reserve: Technical aspects.

Authors:  Ran Klein; Rob S B Beanlands; Robert A deKemp
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Prediction of short-term cardiovascular events using quantification of global myocardial flow reserve in patients referred for clinical 82Rb PET perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Kenji Fukushima; Mehrbod S Javadi; Takahiro Higuchi; Riikka Lautamäki; Jennifer Merrill; Stephan G Nekolla; Frank M Bengel
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Three-dimensional correction for spillover and recovery of myocardial PET images.

Authors:  H Nuyts; A Maes; M Vrolix; C Schiepers; H Schelbert; W Kuhle; G Bormans; G Poppe; D Buxton; P Suetens; H De Geest; L Mortelmans
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Cardiac PET/CT misregistration causes significant changes in estimated myocardial blood flow.

Authors:  Mahadevan Rajaram; Abdel K Tahari; Andy H Lee; Martin A Lodge; Benjamin Tsui; Stephan Nekolla; Richard L Wahl; Frank M Bengel; Paco E Bravo
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Physiological basis for angina and ST-segment change PET-verified thresholds of quantitative stress myocardial perfusion and coronary flow reserve.

Authors:  Nils P Johnson; K Lance Gould
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-09

7.  Consequences of using a simplified kinetic model for dynamic PET data.

Authors:  P G Coxson; R H Huesman; L Borland
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 8.  Clinical myocardial perfusion PET/CT.

Authors:  Marcelo F Di Carli; Sharmila Dorbala; Jolene Meserve; Georges El Fakhri; Arkadiusz Sitek; Stephen C Moore
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Rubidium-82 PET-CT for quantitative assessment of myocardial blood flow: validation in a canine model of coronary artery stenosis.

Authors:  Riikka Lautamäki; Richard T George; Kakuya Kitagawa; Takahiro Higuchi; Jennifer Merrill; Corina Voicu; Anthony DiPaula; Stephan G Nekolla; João A C Lima; Albert C Lardo; Frank M Bengel
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Effect of reconstruction algorithms on myocardial blood flow measurement with 13N-ammonia PET.

Authors:  Grace P Chen; Kelley R Branch; Adam M Alessio; Pam Pham; Ramin Tabibiazar; Paul Kinahan; James H Caldwell
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2007-07-13       Impact factor: 10.057

View more
  30 in total

Review 1.  Clinical use of quantitative cardiac perfusion PET: rationale, modalities and possible indications. Position paper of the Cardiovascular Committee of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM).

Authors:  Roberto Sciagrà; Alessandro Passeri; Jan Bucerius; Hein J Verberne; Riemer H J A Slart; Oliver Lindner; Alessia Gimelli; Fabien Hyafil; Denis Agostini; Christopher Übleis; Marcus Hacker
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  The utility of 82Rb PET for myocardial viability assessment: Comparison with perfusion-metabolism 82Rb-18F-FDG PET.

Authors:  Jonathan B Moody; Keri M Hiller; Benjamin C Lee; Alexis Poitrasson-Rivière; James R Corbett; Richard L Weinberg; Venkatesh L Murthy; Edward P Ficaro
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Feasibility of dynamic stress 201Tl/rest 99mTc-tetrofosmin single photon emission computed tomography for quantification of myocardial perfusion reserve in patients with stable coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Sangwon Han; Young-Hak Kim; Jung-Min Ahn; Soo-Jin Kang; Jungsu S Oh; Eonwoo Shin; Changhwan Sung; Sun Young Chae; Seung-Jung Park; Gillan Grimberg; Gil Kovalski; Dae Hyuk Moon
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-06-02       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Myocardial Creep: we can now look it in the eye without framewise PET-CT registration for myocardial blood flow quantification.

Authors:  Elia von Felten; Andreas A Giannopoulos
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  The potential for PET-guided revascularization of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Matthieu Pelletier-Galarneau; Terrence D Ruddy
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Advances in imaging instrumentation for nuclear cardiology.

Authors:  Jae Sung Lee; Gil Kovalski; Tali Sharir; Dong Soo Lee
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Time-frame sampling for 82Rb PET flow quantification: Towards standardization of clinical protocols.

Authors:  Ran Klein; Adrian Ocneanu; Robert A deKemp
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  Protection of coronary circulation: Evaluation by PET perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Antti Saraste; Heikki Ukkonen; Juhani Knuuti
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Accurate myocardial blood flow measurements: Quality from start to finish is key to success.

Authors:  James Case
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-12-02       Impact factor: 5.952

10.  Technical aspects of acquiring and measuring myocardial blood flow: Method, technique, and QA.

Authors:  John R Votaw; René R Sevag Packard
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 5.952

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.