Literature DB >> 16517965

ACR accreditation of nuclear medicine and PET imaging departments.

Carolyn Richards MacFarlane1.   

Abstract

The accreditation programs of the American College of Radiology (ACR) are the most established and widely proven for all imaging modalities. For facilities committed to quality imaging, the ACR Nuclear Medicine and PET Accreditation Program provides a solid foundation for a continuous quality improvement program through a peer review and educational process. This article provides general information describing the goals and development of the ACR accreditation programs. The ACR Nuclear Medicine and PET Accreditation Program evaluates the qualifications of personnel, equipment, image quality, and quality control measures. It is believed that these are the primary factors that have an impact on the quality of patient imaging. This article describes the application process, including the clinical examinations that are required and the quality control and performance tests that are expected from each facility. Outcomes and pass/fail statistics are discussed, as are common pitfalls that may cause deficiencies. Upon completion of this article, the reader should be able to describe the application process, the components of the ACR accreditation program, the most common causes for failure, and the site survey process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16517965

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med Technol        ISSN: 0091-4916


  16 in total

1.  Variability in PET quantitation within a multicenter consortium.

Authors:  Frederic H Fahey; Paul E Kinahan; Robert K Doot; Mehmet Kocak; Harold Thurston; Tina Young Poussaint
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Towards a successful clinical implementation of fluorescence-guided surgery.

Authors:  T J A Snoeks; P B A A van Driel; S Keereweer; S Aime; K M Brindle; G M van Dam; C W G M Löwik; V Ntziachristos; A L Vahrmeijer
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Performance evaluation of the Ingenuity TF PET/CT scanner with a focus on high count-rate conditions.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Kolthammer; Kuan-Hao Su; Anu Grover; Manoj Narayanan; David W Jordan; Raymond F Muzic
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Classification and evaluation strategies of auto-segmentation approaches for PET: Report of AAPM task group No. 211.

Authors:  Mathieu Hatt; John A Lee; Charles R Schmidtlein; Issam El Naqa; Curtis Caldwell; Elisabetta De Bernardi; Wei Lu; Shiva Das; Xavier Geets; Vincent Gregoire; Robert Jeraj; Michael P MacManus; Osama R Mawlawi; Ursula Nestle; Andrei B Pugachev; Heiko Schöder; Tony Shepherd; Emiliano Spezi; Dimitris Visvikis; Habib Zaidi; Assen S Kirov
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 5.  Qualification of National Cancer Institute-Designated Cancer Centers for Quantitative PET/CT Imaging in Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Joshua S Scheuermann; Janet S Reddin; Adam Opanowski; Paul E Kinahan; Barry A Siegel; Lalitha K Shankar; Joel S Karp
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  The QIBA Profile for FDG PET/CT as an Imaging Biomarker Measuring Response to Cancer Therapy.

Authors:  Paul E Kinahan; Eric S Perlman; John J Sunderland; Rathan Subramaniam; Scott D Wollenweber; Timothy G Turkington; Martin A Lodge; Ronald Boellaard; Nancy A Obuchowski; Richard L Wahl
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Qualification of PET scanners for use in multicenter cancer clinical trials: the American College of Radiology Imaging Network experience.

Authors:  Joshua S Scheuermann; Janet R Saffer; Joel S Karp; Anthony M Levering; Barry A Siegel
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Measurement of PET Quantitative Bias In Vivo.

Authors:  Martin A Lodge; Wojciech Lesniak; Michael A Gorin; Kenneth J Pienta; Steven P Rowe; Martin G Pomper
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Simultaneous Estimation of Bias and Resolution in PET Images With a Long-Lived "Pocket" Phantom System.

Authors:  Paul E Kinahan; Darrin W Byrd; Brian Helba; Kristen A Wangerin; Xiaoxiao Liu; Joshua R Levy; Keith C Allberg; Karthik Krishnan; Ricardo S Avila
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2018-03

10.  Co-Clinical Imaging Resource Program (CIRP): Bridging the Translational Divide to Advance Precision Medicine.

Authors:  Kooresh I Shoghi; Cristian T Badea; Stephanie J Blocker; Thomas L Chenevert; Richard Laforest; Michael T Lewis; Gary D Luker; H Charles Manning; Daniel S Marcus; Yvonne M Mowery; Stephen Pickup; Ann Richmond; Brian D Ross; Anna E Vilgelm; Thomas E Yankeelov; Rong Zhou
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2020-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.