Literature DB >> 3489018

Quantitation in positron emission computed tomography: 7. A technique to reduce noise in accidental coincidence measurements and coincidence efficiency calibration.

M E Casey, E J Hoffman.   

Abstract

A method of processing accidental coincidence events (AC) and detector efficiency (DE) calibration data, which reduces the statistical noise in these measurements, and, consequently, reduces the noise in positron emission tomographic images using the technique, is described. The technique uses the fact that, in these measurements with N detectors in coincidence with N other detectors, N2 values of ACs or DEs are measured. However, these values are composed of only 2N components, which are either singles rates or individual DEs. The full set of data is used to implicitly solve for these values and the individual ACs or DEs recalculated with an improvement in statistical error equivalent to an N2/(2N + 1) increase in accumulated events for the case of a uniform distribution. This result was verified experimentally.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3489018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr        ISSN: 0363-8715            Impact factor:   1.826


  23 in total

Review 1.  3D acquisition and reconstruction in positron emission tomography.

Authors:  D L Bailey
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 2.668

2.  Optimization of noise equivalent count rate performance for a partially collimated PET scanner by varying the number of septa.

Authors:  Ruth E Schmitz; Robert L Harrison; Charles W Stearns; Thomas K Lewellen; Paul E Kinahan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Image Reconstruction for a Partially Collimated Whole Body PET Scanner.

Authors:  Adam M Alessio; Ruth E Schmitz; Lawrence R Macdonald; Scott D Wollenweber; Charles W Stearns; Steven G Ross; Alex Ganin; Thomas K Lewellen; Paul E Kinahan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.679

4.  Performance evaluation of the Ingenuity TF PET/CT scanner with a focus on high count-rate conditions.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Kolthammer; Kuan-Hao Su; Anu Grover; Manoj Narayanan; David W Jordan; Raymond F Muzic
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Plane-dependent ML scatter scaling: 3D extension of the 2D simulated single scatter (SSS) estimate.

Authors:  Ahmadreza Rezaei; Koen Salvo; Thomas Vahle; Vladimir Panin; Michael Casey; Fernando Boada; Michel Defrise; Johan Nuyts
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Sensitivity and cross calibration.

Authors:  A M Paans; D W Lamotte
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1989

7.  Image-derived input function estimation on a TOF-enabled PET/MR for cerebral blood flow mapping.

Authors:  Mohammad Mehdi Khalighi; Timothy W Deller; Audrey Peiwen Fan; Praveen K Gulaka; Bin Shen; Prachi Singh; Jun-Hyung Park; Frederick T Chin; Greg Zaharchuk
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 6.200

8.  Reconstruction of rapidly acquired Germanium-68 transmission scans for cardiac PET attenuation correction.

Authors:  Bai-Ling Hsu; James A Case; Kevin W Moser; Timothy M Bateman; S James Cullom
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Accurate event-driven motion compensation in high-resolution PET incorporating scattered and random events.

Authors:  Arman Rahmim; Katie Dinelle; Ju-Chieh Cheng; Mikhail A Shilov; William P Segars; Sarah C Lidstone; Stephan Blinder; Olivier G Rousset; Hamid Vajihollahi; Benjamin M W Tsui; Dean F Wong; Vesna Sossi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 10.048

10.  The imaging performance of a LaBr3-based PET scanner.

Authors:  M E Daube-Witherspoon; S Surti; A Perkins; C C M Kyba; R Wiener; M E Werner; R Kulp; J S Karp
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.