Literature DB >> 8441036

Sampling requirements for dynamic cardiac PET studies using image-derived input functions.

R R Raylman1, J M Caraher, G D Hutchins.   

Abstract

The utilization of image-derived input functions is becoming common in quantitative PET studies of the heart. Consequently, imaging protocols must be designed to sample both blood and tissue concentrations adequately. Most clinical imaging protocols consist of a series of short initial scans to measure the rapid change in blood and tissue tracer concentration levels, followed by scans of gradually increasing length. The number of initial short scans must be matched to the shape of the input function. In this paper, noise-free simulation studies were performed to evaluate the effect of temporal sampling on estimates of the parameters of a two-compartment kinetic model. In addition, the consequences of varying tracer infusion length and timing were studied. The kinetic model parameters' bias decreased when infusion times were lengthened or sampling rates increased. Our results indicated that tracer infusions of 30 sec were best suited for these studies. Two currently employed clinical imaging protocols were then optimized for use with this infusion scheme. Ten initial scans with durations of 10 sec, or twenty of 5 sec length produced unbiased estimates of kinetic model parameters that describe myocardial physiology. Noisy simulations with the equivalent of one million events confirmed these results.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8441036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  14 in total

Review 1.  Clinical use of quantitative cardiac perfusion PET: rationale, modalities and possible indications. Position paper of the Cardiovascular Committee of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM).

Authors:  Roberto Sciagrà; Alessandro Passeri; Jan Bucerius; Hein J Verberne; Riemer H J A Slart; Oliver Lindner; Alessia Gimelli; Fabien Hyafil; Denis Agostini; Christopher Übleis; Marcus Hacker
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Analysis of penalized likelihood image reconstruction for dynamic PET quantification.

Authors:  Guobao Wang; Jinyi Qi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Performance evaluation of the Ingenuity TF PET/CT scanner with a focus on high count-rate conditions.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Kolthammer; Kuan-Hao Su; Anu Grover; Manoj Narayanan; David W Jordan; Raymond F Muzic
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Experimental verification of technetium 99m-labeled teboroxime kinetic parameters in the myocardium with dynamic single-photon emission computed tomography: reproducibility, correlation to flow, and susceptibility to extravascular contamination.

Authors:  A M Smith; G T Gullberg; P E Christian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1996 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 5.  What is the current status of quantification and nuclear medicine in cardiology?

Authors:  G Hör
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1996-07

Review 6.  Precision and accuracy of clinical quantification of myocardial blood flow by dynamic PET: A technical perspective.

Authors:  Jonathan B Moody; Benjamin C Lee; James R Corbett; Edward P Ficaro; Venkatesh L Murthy
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Optimization of temporal sampling for 82rubidium PET myocardial blood flow quantification.

Authors:  Benjamin C Lee; Jonathan B Moody; Richard L Weinberg; James R Corbett; Edward P Ficaro; Venkatesh L Murthy
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  Clinical Quantification of Myocardial Blood Flow Using PET: Joint Position Paper of the SNMMI Cardiovascular Council and the ASNC.

Authors:  Venkatesh L Murthy; Timothy M Bateman; Rob S Beanlands; Daniel S Berman; Salvador Borges-Neto; Panithaya Chareonthaitawee; Manuel D Cerqueira; Robert A deKemp; E Gordon DePuey; Vasken Dilsizian; Sharmila Dorbala; Edward P Ficaro; Ernest V Garcia; Henry Gewirtz; Gary V Heller; Howard C Lewin; Saurabh Malhotra; April Mann; Terrence D Ruddy; Thomas H Schindler; Ronald G Schwartz; Piotr J Slomka; Prem Soman; Marcelo F Di Carli; Andrew Einstein; Raymond Russell; James R Corbett
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Interobserver and interstudy variability of myocardial blood flow and flow-reserve measurements with nitrogen 13 ammonia-labeled positron emission tomography.

Authors:  S Sawada; O Muzik; R S Beanlands; E Wolfe; G D Hutchins; M Schwaiger
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1995 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.952

10.  Clinical implications of compromised 82Rb PET data acquisition.

Authors:  Andrew Van Tosh; J Jane Cao; John R Votaw; C David Cooke; Christopher J Palestro; Kenneth J Nichols
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2021-08-20       Impact factor: 3.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.