Literature DB >> 22415630

Likelihood-based methods for regression analysis with binary exposure status assessed by pooling.

Robert H Lyles1, Li Tang, Ji Lin, Zhiwei Zhang, Bhramar Mukherjee.   

Abstract

The need for resource-intensive laboratory assays to assess exposures in many epidemiologic studies provides ample motivation to consider study designs that incorporate pooled samples. In this paper, we consider the case in which specimens are combined for the purpose of determining the presence or absence of a pool-wise exposure, in lieu of assessing the actual binary exposure status for each member of the pool. We presume a primary logistic regression model for an observed binary outcome, together with a secondary regression model for exposure. We facilitate maximum likelihood analysis by complete enumeration of the possible implications of a positive pool, and we discuss the applicability of this approach under both cross-sectional and case-control sampling. We also provide a maximum likelihood approach for longitudinal or repeated measures studies where the binary outcome and exposure are assessed on multiple occasions and within-subject pooling is conducted for exposure assessment. Simulation studies illustrate the performance of the proposed approaches along with their computational feasibility using widely available software. We apply the methods to investigate gene-disease association in a population-based case-control study of colorectal cancer.
Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22415630      PMCID: PMC3528351          DOI: 10.1002/sim.4426

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  13 in total

1.  Regression models for disease prevalence with diagnostic tests on pools of serum samples.

Authors:  S Vansteelandt; E Goetghebeur; T Verstraeten
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Using pooled exposure assessment to improve efficiency in case-control studies.

Authors:  C R Weinberg; D M Umbach
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Pooling biospecimens and limits of detection: effects on ROC curve analysis.

Authors:  Sunni L Mumford; Enrique F Schisterman; Albert Vexler; Aiyi Liu
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2006-03-10       Impact factor: 5.899

4.  Estimation of ROC curves based on stably distributed biomarkers subject to measurement error and pooling mixtures.

Authors:  Albert Vexler; Enrique F Schisterman; Aiyi Liu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Pooling designs for outcomes under a Gaussian random effects model.

Authors:  Yaakov Malinovsky; Paul S Albert; Enrique F Schisterman
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2011-10-09       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Statins and the risk of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Jenny N Poynter; Stephen B Gruber; Peter D R Higgins; Ronit Almog; Joseph D Bonner; Hedy S Rennert; Marcelo Low; Joel K Greenson; Gad Rennert
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-05-26       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Group testing regression models with fixed and random effects.

Authors:  Peng Chen; Joshua M Tebbs; Christopher R Bilder
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  To pool or not to pool, from whether to when: applications of pooling to biospecimens subject to a limit of detection.

Authors:  Enrique F Schisterman; Albert Vexler
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.980

9.  Meta-analysis of genome-wide association data identifies four new susceptibility loci for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Richard S Houlston; Emily Webb; Peter Broderick; Alan M Pittman; Maria Chiara Di Bernardo; Steven Lubbe; Ian Chandler; Jayaram Vijayakrishnan; Kate Sullivan; Steven Penegar; Luis Carvajal-Carmona; Kimberley Howarth; Emma Jaeger; Sarah L Spain; Axel Walther; Ella Barclay; Lynn Martin; Maggie Gorman; Enric Domingo; Ana S Teixeira; David Kerr; Jean-Baptiste Cazier; Iina Niittymäki; Sari Tuupanen; Auli Karhu; Lauri A Aaltonen; Ian P M Tomlinson; Susan M Farrington; Albert Tenesa; James G D Prendergast; Rebecca A Barnetson; Roseanne Cetnarskyj; Mary E Porteous; Paul D P Pharoah; Thibaud Koessler; Jochen Hampe; Stephan Buch; Clemens Schafmayer; Jurgen Tepel; Stefan Schreiber; Henry Völzke; Jenny Chang-Claude; Michael Hoffmeister; Hermann Brenner; Brent W Zanke; Alexandre Montpetit; Thomas J Hudson; Steven Gallinger; Harry Campbell; Malcolm G Dunlop
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2008-11-16       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  Hybrid pooled-unpooled design for cost-efficient measurement of biomarkers.

Authors:  Enrique F Schisterman; Albert Vexler; Sunni L Mumford; Neil J Perkins
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

View more
  7 in total

1.  Semiparametric regression models for a right-skewed outcome subject to pooling.

Authors:  Emily M Mitchell; Robert H Lyles; Amita K Manatunga; Enrique F Schisterman
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Prevalence estimation subject to misclassification: the mis-substitution bias and some remedies.

Authors:  Zhiwei Zhang; Chunling Liu; Sungduk Kim; Aiyi Liu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Estimating relative risk of a log-transformed exposure measured in pools.

Authors:  Emily M Mitchell; Torie C Plowden; Enrique F Schisterman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Regression for skewed biomarker outcomes subject to pooling.

Authors:  Emily M Mitchell; Robert H Lyles; Amita K Manatunga; Michelle Danaher; Neil J Perkins; Enrique F Schisterman
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  The biomarker revolution.

Authors:  Enrique F Schisterman; Paul S Albert
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  A highly efficient design strategy for regression with outcome pooling.

Authors:  Emily M Mitchell; Robert H Lyles; Amita K Manatunga; Neil J Perkins; Enrique F Schisterman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Pooling Bio-Specimens in the Presence of Measurement Error and Non-Linearity in Dose-Response: Simulation Study in the Context of a Birth Cohort Investigating Risk Factors for Autism Spectrum Disorders.

Authors:  Karyn Heavner; Craig Newschaffer; Irva Hertz-Picciotto; Deborah Bennett; Igor Burstyn
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.