Literature DB >> 28349583

A general framework for the regression analysis of pooled biomarker assessments.

Yan Liu1, Christopher McMahan1, Colin Gallagher1.   

Abstract

As a cost-efficient data collection mechanism, the process of assaying pooled biospecimens is becoming increasingly common in epidemiological research; for example, pooling has been proposed for the purpose of evaluating the diagnostic efficacy of biological markers (biomarkers). To this end, several authors have proposed techniques that allow for the analysis of continuous pooled biomarker assessments. Regretfully, most of these techniques proceed under restrictive assumptions, are unable to account for the effects of measurement error, and fail to control for confounding variables. These limitations are understandably attributable to the complex structure that is inherent to measurements taken on pooled specimens. Consequently, in order to provide practitioners with the tools necessary to accurately and efficiently analyze pooled biomarker assessments, herein, a general Monte Carlo maximum likelihood-based procedure is presented. The proposed approach allows for the regression analysis of pooled data under practically all parametric models and can be used to directly account for the effects of measurement error. Through simulation, it is shown that the proposed approach can accurately and efficiently estimate all unknown parameters and is more computational efficient than existing techniques. This new methodology is further illustrated using monocyte chemotactic protein-1 data collected by the Collaborative Perinatal Project in an effort to assess the relationship between this chemokine and the risk of miscarriage.
Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Monte Carlo maximum likelihood estimation; biomarker pooling; measurement error; pooled biospecimens

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28349583      PMCID: PMC5484591          DOI: 10.1002/sim.7291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  23 in total

1.  Regression models for disease prevalence with diagnostic tests on pools of serum samples.

Authors:  S Vansteelandt; E Goetghebeur; T Verstraeten
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Statistical inference for the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve in the presence of random measurement error.

Authors:  E F Schisterman; D Faraggi; B Reiser; M Trevisan
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2001-07-15       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  The efficiency of pooling in the detection of rare mutations.

Authors:  J L Gastwirth
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Pooling biospecimens and limits of detection: effects on ROC curve analysis.

Authors:  Sunni L Mumford; Enrique F Schisterman; Albert Vexler; Aiyi Liu
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2006-03-10       Impact factor: 5.899

5.  Estimation of ROC curves based on stably distributed biomarkers subject to measurement error and pooling mixtures.

Authors:  Albert Vexler; Enrique F Schisterman; Aiyi Liu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Pooling nasopharyngeal/throat swab specimens to increase testing capacity for influenza viruses by PCR.

Authors:  Tam T Van; Joseph Miller; David M Warshauer; Erik Reisdorf; Daniel Jernigan; Rosemary Humes; Peter A Shult
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Cost savings and increased efficiency using a stratified specimen pooling strategy for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae.

Authors:  Joanna Lynn Lewis; Vivian Marie Lockary; Sadika Kobic
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.830

8.  Analysis of multistage pooling studies of biological specimens for estimating disease incidence and prevalence.

Authors:  R Brookmeyer
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Nucleic acid test screening of blood donors for orthopoxviruses can potentially prevent dispersion of viral agents in case of bioterrorism.

Authors:  Michael Schmidt; W Kurt Roth; Hermann Meyer; Erhard Seifried; Michael K Hourfar
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.157

10.  Hepatitis B virus testing by minipool nucleic acid testing: does it improve blood safety?

Authors:  Susan L Stramer; Edward P Notari; David E Krysztof; Roger Y Dodd
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 3.157

View more
  2 in total

1.  Logistic regression with a continuous exposure measured in pools and subject to errors.

Authors:  Dane R Van Domelen; Emily M Mitchell; Neil J Perkins; Enrique F Schisterman; Amita K Manatunga; Yijian Huang; Robert H Lyles
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Varying-coefficient regression analysis for pooled biomonitoring.

Authors:  Dewei Wang; Xichen Mou; Yan Liu
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 2.571

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.