Literature DB >> 24512610

First saccadic eye movement reveals persistent attentional guidance by implicit learning.

Yuhong V Jiang1, Bo-Yeong Won1, Khena M Swallow2.   

Abstract

Implicit learning about where a visual search target is likely to appear often speeds up search. However, whether implicit learning guides spatial attention or affects postsearch decisional processes remains controversial. Using eye tracking, this study provides compelling evidence that implicit learning guides attention. In a training phase, participants often found the target in a high-frequency, "rich" quadrant of the display. When subsequently tested in a phase during which the target was randomly located, participants were twice as likely to direct the first saccadic eye movement to the previously rich quadrant than to any of the sparse quadrants. The attentional bias persisted for nearly 200 trials after training and was unabated by explicit instructions to distribute attention evenly. We propose that implicit learning guides spatial attention but in a qualitatively different manner than goal-driven attention. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24512610      PMCID: PMC4038710          DOI: 10.1037/a0035961

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  43 in total

1.  Guidance of spatial attention by incidental learning and endogenous cuing.

Authors:  Yuhong V Jiang; Khena M Swallow; Gail M Rosenbaum
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Spatial probability as an attentional cue in visual search.

Authors:  Joy J Geng; Marlene Behrmann
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2005-10

Review 3.  Eye movements: the past 25 years.

Authors:  Eileen Kowler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Spatial attention and implicit sequence learning: evidence for independent learning of spatial and nonspatial sequences.

Authors:  U Mayr
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

6.  On the development of procedural knowledge.

Authors:  D B Willingham; M J Nissen; P Bullemer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Probabilistic cuing in large-scale environmental search.

Authors:  Alastair D Smith; Bruce M Hood; Iain D Gilchrist
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 8.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.

Authors:  R Desimone; J Duncan
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 12.449

9.  Spatial reference frame of incidentally learned attention.

Authors:  Yuhong V Jiang; Khena M Swallow
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2012-12-31

Review 10.  Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy.

Authors:  Edward Awh; Artem V Belopolsky; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 20.229

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Habitual versus goal-driven attention.

Authors:  Yuhong V Jiang
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 4.027

2.  The impact of implicit and explicit suggestions that 'there is nothing to learn' on implicit sequence learning.

Authors:  Luc Vermeylen; Elger Abrahamse; Senne Braem; Davide Rigoni
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-08-04

3.  Spatial working memory interferes with explicit, but not probabilistic cuing of spatial attention.

Authors:  Bo-Yeong Won; Yuhong V Jiang
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Acquisition of habitual visual attention and transfer to related tasks.

Authors:  Nikita A Salovich; Roger W Remington; Yuhong V Jiang
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-06

5.  Task specificity of attention training: the case of probability cuing.

Authors:  Yuhong V Jiang; Khena M Swallow; Bo-Yeong Won; Julia D Cistera; Gail M Rosenbaum
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Shifting expectations: Lapses in spatial attention are driven by anticipatory attentional shifts.

Authors:  Christopher M Jones; Emma Wu Dowd; Julie D Golomb
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 2.157

7.  Habit-like attentional bias is unlike goal-driven attentional bias against spatial updating.

Authors:  Injae Hong; Min-Shik Kim
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2022-06-17

8.  The effects of perceptual cues on visual statistical learning: Evidence from children and adults.

Authors:  Yingying Yang; Qiongya Song
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-04-19

9.  Task-Irrelevant Expectation Violations in Sequential Manual Actions: Evidence for a "Check-after-Surprise" Mode of Visual Attention and Eye-Hand Decoupling.

Authors:  Rebecca M Foerster
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-11-23

10.  Statistical learning of target selection and distractor suppression shape attentional priority according to different timeframes.

Authors:  Valeria Di Caro; Chiara Della Libera
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.