Literature DB >> 2530305

On the development of procedural knowledge.

D B Willingham1, M J Nissen, P Bullemer.   

Abstract

Amnesic patients demonstrate by their performance on a serial reaction time task that they learned a repeating spatial sequence despite their lack of awareness of the repetition (Nissen & Bullemer, 1987). In the experiments reported here, we investigated this form of procedural learning in normal subjects. A subgroup of subjects showed substantial procedural learning of the sequence in the absence of explicit declarative knowledge of it. Their ability to generate the sequence was effectively at chance and showed no savings in learning. Additional amounts of training increased both procedural and declarative knowledge of the sequence. Development of knowledge in one system seems not to depend on knowledge in the other. Procedural learning in this situation is neither solely perceptual nor solely motor. The learning shows minimal transfer to a situation employing the same motor sequence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2530305     DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.15.6.1047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  157 in total

1.  Functional networks in motor sequence learning: abnormal topographies in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  T Nakamura; M F Ghilardi; M Mentis; V Dhawan; M Fukuda; A Hacking; J R Moeller; C Ghez; D Eidelberg
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Saccadic latency during perceptual processing and sequence learning.

Authors:  J G May; M L Berg; L A Zebley
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Implicit motor sequence learning is represented in response locations.

Authors:  D B Willingham; L A Wells; J M Farrell; M E Stemwedel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-04

4.  Can sequence learning be implicit? New evidence with the process dissociation procedure.

Authors:  A Destrebecqz; A Cleeremans
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-06

5.  The effects of concurrent task interference on category learning: evidence for multiple category learning systems.

Authors:  E M Waldron; F G Ashby
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-03

6.  Chunking processes in the learning of event sequences: electrophysiological indicators.

Authors:  F Schlaghecken; B Stürmer; M Eimer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-07

7.  Implicit motor sequence learning is not purely perceptual.

Authors:  D B Willingham
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-05

Review 8.  On the nature of implicit categorization.

Authors:  F G Ashby; E M Waldron
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-09

Review 9.  The many facets of motor learning and their relevance for Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Lucio Marinelli; Angelo Quartarone; Mark Hallett; Giuseppe Frazzitta; Maria Felice Ghilardi
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-04-09       Impact factor: 3.708

10.  Sequential behavior in the rat: role of skill and attention.

Authors:  Dorothée Domenger; Rainer K W Schwarting
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.