Literature DB >> 23287419

Spatial reference frame of incidentally learned attention.

Yuhong V Jiang1, Khena M Swallow.   

Abstract

Visual attention prioritizes information presented at particular spatial locations. These locations can be defined in reference frames centered on the environment or on the viewer. This study investigates whether incidentally learned attention uses a viewer-centered or environment-centered reference frame. Participants conducted visual search on a monitor laid flat on a tabletop. During training, the target was more likely to appear in a "rich" quadrant than in other "sparse" quadrants. Although participants were unaware of this manipulation, they found the target faster in the rich quadrant than in the sparse quadrants, showing probability cuing. In a subsequent testing phase, participants were reseated to change their viewpoint by 90°. In addition, the target became equally likely to appear in any quadrant. Spatial attention continued to be biased for several hundred trials. Critically, the attentional bias moved with the participant, shifting to a previously sparse quadrant on the screen. Incidental learning of a target's likely locations led to a persistent, egocentric spatial bias.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23287419     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.10.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  20 in total

Review 1.  Habitual versus goal-driven attention.

Authors:  Yuhong V Jiang
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 4.027

2.  Value-Driven Attentional Capture is Modulated by Spatial Context.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2015

3.  Spatial reference frame of attention in a large outdoor environment.

Authors:  Yuhong V Jiang; Bo-Yeong Won; Khena M Swallow; Dominic M Mussack
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Reward learning biases the direction of saccades.

Authors:  Ming-Ray Liao; Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2019-11-27

5.  Spatial working memory interferes with explicit, but not probabilistic cuing of spatial attention.

Authors:  Bo-Yeong Won; Yuhong V Jiang
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 6.  Controlled information processing, automaticity, and the burden of proof.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-10

7.  Task specificity of attention training: the case of probability cuing.

Authors:  Yuhong V Jiang; Khena M Swallow; Bo-Yeong Won; Julia D Cistera; Gail M Rosenbaum
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Category-specific learned attentional bias to object parts.

Authors:  Kao-Wei Chua; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Spatial scale, rather than nature of task or locomotion, modulates the spatial reference frame of attention.

Authors:  Yuhong V Jiang; Bo-Yeong Won
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Changing viewer perspectives reveals constraints to implicit visual statistical learning.

Authors:  Yuhong V Jiang; Khena M Swallow
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.