Literature DB >> 20438260

Probabilistic cuing in large-scale environmental search.

Alastair D Smith1, Bruce M Hood, Iain D Gilchrist.   

Abstract

Finding an object in our environment is an important human ability that also represents a critical component of human foraging behavior. One type of information that aids efficient large-scale search is the likelihood of the object being in one location over another. In this study we investigated the conditions under which individuals respond to this likelihood, and the reference frames in which this information is coded, using a novel, large-scale environmental search paradigm. Participants searched an array of locations, on the floor of a room, for a hidden target by pressing switches at each location. We manipulated the probability of the target being at a particular set of locations. Participants reliably learned target likelihoods when the possible search locations were kept constant throughout the experiment and the starting location was fixed. There was no evidence of such learning when room-based and body-based reference frames were dissociated. However, when this was combined with a more salient perceptual landmark, an allocentric cuing effect was observed. These data suggest that the encoding of this type of statistical contingency depends on the combination of spatial cues. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20438260     DOI: 10.1037/a0018280

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  15 in total

1.  Scanners and drillers: characterizing expert visual search through volumetric images.

Authors:  Trafton Drew; Melissa Le-Hoa Vo; Alex Olwal; Francine Jacobson; Steven E Seltzer; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 2.  Habitual versus goal-driven attention.

Authors:  Yuhong V Jiang
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 4.027

3.  Spatial navigational impairments in hydrocephalus.

Authors:  Alastair D Smith; Matthew G Buckley
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2012-08

4.  Spatial reference frame of attention in a large outdoor environment.

Authors:  Yuhong V Jiang; Bo-Yeong Won; Khena M Swallow; Dominic M Mussack
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Children with autism are neither systematic nor optimal foragers.

Authors:  Elizabeth Pellicano; Alastair D Smith; Filipe Cristino; Bruce M Hood; Josie Briscoe; Iain D Gilchrist
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-12-20       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Spatial scale, rather than nature of task or locomotion, modulates the spatial reference frame of attention.

Authors:  Yuhong V Jiang; Bo-Yeong Won
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Changing viewer perspectives reveals constraints to implicit visual statistical learning.

Authors:  Yuhong V Jiang; Khena M Swallow
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  First saccadic eye movement reveals persistent attentional guidance by implicit learning.

Authors:  Yuhong V Jiang; Bo-Yeong Won; Khena M Swallow
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Context-gated statistical learning and its role in visual-saccadic decisions.

Authors:  Casimir J H Ludwig; Simon Farrell; Lucy A Ellis; Tom E Hardwicke; Iain D Gilchrist
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2011-08-15

Review 10.  Guided Search 6.0: An updated model of visual search.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-02-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.