Literature DB >> 24265395

Influence of object location in different FOVs on trabecular bone microstructure measurements of human mandible: a cone beam CT study.

N Ibrahim1, A Parsa, B Hassan, P van der Stelt, I H A Aartman, P Nambiar.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the influence of different object locations in different fields of view (FOVs) of two cone beam CT (CBCT) systems on trabecular bone microstructure measurements of a human mandible. A block of dry human mandible was scanned at five different locations (centre, left, right, anterior and posterior) using five different FOVs of two CBCT systems (NewTom™ 5G; QR Verona, Verona, Italy and Accuitomo 170; Morita, Kyoto, Japan). Image analysis software (CTAn software v. 1.1; SkyScan, Kontich, Belgium) was used to assess the trabecular bone microstructural parameters (thickness, Tb.Th; spacing, Tb.Sp; number, Tb.N; bone volume density, BV/TV). All measurements were taken twice by one trained observer. Tb.Th, Tb.Sp and Tb.N varied significantly across different FOVs in the NewTom 5G (p < 0.001) and the Accuitomo 170 (p < 0.001). For location, a significant difference was observed only when measuring BV/TV (p = 0.03) using the NewTom 5G. The trabecular bone microstructural measurements obtained from CBCT systems are influenced by the size of FOVs. Not all trabecular bone parameters measured using different CBCT systems are affected when varying the object location within the FOVs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cone beam CT; diagnostic imaging; mandible; trabecular bone

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24265395      PMCID: PMC4064619          DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20130329

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol        ISSN: 0250-832X            Impact factor:   2.419


  28 in total

1.  The discrete nature of trabecular bone microarchitecture affects implant stability.

Authors:  Andreas J Wirth; Ralph Müller; G Harry van Lenthe
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-01-28       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  The influence of exposure parameters on jawbone model accuracy using cone beam CT and multislice CT.

Authors:  B Vandenberghe; S Luchsinger; J Hostens; E Dhoore; R Jacobs
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  The effect of voxel size on high-resolution peripheral computed tomography measurements of trabecular and cortical bone microstructure.

Authors:  Willy Tjong; Galateia J Kazakia; Andrew J Burghardt; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Characterization and correction of cupping effect artefacts in cone beam CT.

Authors:  A K Hunter; W D McDavid
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  Accelerating image acquisition in 64-MDCT: the influence of scan parameters on image resolution and quality in a phantom study.

Authors:  Thorsten Klink; Marc Regier; Udo van Stevendaal; Michael Grass; Gerhard Adam; Philipp Begemann
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 1.605

6.  Analysis of intensity variability in multislice and cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Olivia Nackaerts; Frederik Maes; Hua Yan; Paulo Couto Souza; Ruben Pauwels; Reinhilde Jacobs
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 5.977

7.  Influence of cone beam CT scanning parameters on grey value measurements at an implant site.

Authors:  A Parsa; N Ibrahim; B Hassan; A Motroni; P van der Stelt; D Wismeijer
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 2.419

8.  Contrast-to-noise ratio difference in small field of view cone beam computed tomography machines.

Authors:  Boulos Bechara; Clyde A McMahan; William S Moore; Marcel Noujeim; Hassem Geha; Fabricio B Teixeira
Journal:  J Oral Sci       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.556

Review 9.  Diagnostic imaging of trabecular bone microstructure for oral implants: a literature review.

Authors:  N Ibrahim; A Parsa; B Hassan; P van der Stelt; D Wismeijer
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.419

10.  Accuracy of a cone beam computed tomography-guided surgical stent for orthodontic mini-implant placement.

Authors:  Jae-Jung Yu; Gyu-Tae Kim; Yong-Suk Choi; Eui-Hwan Hwang; Janghyun Paek; Seong-Hun Kim; John C Huang
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 2.079

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  CBCT-based bone quality assessment: are Hounsfield units applicable?

Authors:  R Pauwels; R Jacobs; S R Singer; M Mupparapu
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Comparison of mandibular bone microarchitecture between micro-CT and CBCT images.

Authors:  S Panmekiate; N Ngonphloy; T Charoenkarn; T Faruangsaeng; R Pauwels
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 3.  Capability of CBCT to identify patients with low bone mineral density: a systematic review.

Authors:  Eliete N S Guerra; Fabiana T Almeida; Fernanda V Bezerra; Paulo T D S Figueiredo; Maria A G Silva; Graziela De Luca Canto; Camila Pachêco-Pereira; André F Leite
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Effect of exposure parameters and voxel size on bone structure analysis in CBCT.

Authors:  R Pauwels; T Faruangsaeng; T Charoenkarn; N Ngonphloy; S Panmekiate
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  Standardized method to quantify the variation in voxel value distribution in patient-simulated CBCT data sets.

Authors:  R Spin-Neto; E Gotfredsen; A Wenzel
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  Difference in the artefacts production and the performance of the metal artefact reduction (MAR) tool between the buccal and lingual cortical plates adjacent to zirconium dental implant.

Authors:  Eduarda Helena Leandro Nascimento; Rocharles Cavalcante Fontenele; Gustavo Machado Santaella; Deborah Queiroz Freitas
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 2.419

7.  Quantitative analysis of metal artefacts of dental implant in CBCT image by correlation analysis to micro-CT: A microstructural study.

Authors:  Chang-Ki Min; Kyoung-A Kim
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 2.419

8.  Comparison of anterior and posterior trabecular bone microstructure of human mandible using cone-beam CT and micro CT.

Authors:  Norliza Ibrahim; Azin Parsa; Bassam Hassan; Paul van der Stelt; Rabiah A Rahmat; Siti M Ismail; Irene H A Aartman
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-05-08       Impact factor: 2.757

9.  Effect of Voxel Size and Object Location in the Field of View on Detection of Bone Defects in Cone Beam Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Hoorieh Bashizadeh Fakhar; Mysa Mallahi; Mehrdad Panjnoush; Pooneh Mohseni Kashani
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2016-08

10.  Improving the prediction of the trabecular bone microarchitectural parameters using dental cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Rong-Ting He; Ming-Gene Tu; Heng-Li Huang; Ming-Tzu Tsai; Jay Wu; Jui-Ting Hsu
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 1.930

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.