Literature DB >> 25564887

Comparison of mandibular bone microarchitecture between micro-CT and CBCT images.

S Panmekiate1, N Ngonphloy, T Charoenkarn, T Faruangsaeng, R Pauwels.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare microarchitecture parameters of bone samples scanned using micro-CT (µCT) to those obtained by using CBCT.
METHODS: A bone biopsy trephine bur (3 × 10 mm) was used to remove 20 cylindrical bone samples from 20 dry hemimandibles. Samples were scanned using µCT (µCT 35; SCANCO Medical, Brüttisellen, Switzerland) with a voxel size of 20 µm and CBCT (3D Accuitomo 170; J. Morita, Kyoto, Japan) with a voxel size of 80 µm. All corresponding sample scans were aligned and cropped. Image analysis was carried out using BoneJ, including the following parameters: skeleton analysis, bone surface per total volume (BS/TV), bone volume per total volume (BV/TV), connectivity density, anisotropy, trabecular thickness and spacing, structure model index, plateness and fractal dimension. Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients (R) were calculated. CBCT values were then calibrated using the slope of the linear fit with the µCT values. The mean error after calibration was calculated and normalized to the standard deviation of the µCT values.
RESULTS: R-values ranged between 0.05 (plateness) and 0.83 (BS/TV). Correlation was significant for both Spearman and Pearson's R for 8 out of 16 parameters. After calibration, the smallest normalized error was found for BV/TV (0.48). For other parameters, the error range was 0.58-2.10.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the overall correlation, this study demonstrates the uncertainty associated with using bone microarchitecture parameters on CBCT images. Although clinically relevant parameter ranges are not available, the errors found in this study may be too high for some parameters to be considered for clinical application.

Keywords:  bone; bone quality; computer-assisted image processing; cone-beam computed tomography; microcomputed tomography

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25564887      PMCID: PMC4628495          DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20140322

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol        ISSN: 0250-832X            Impact factor:   2.419


  27 in total

1.  Influence of object location in different FOVs on trabecular bone microstructure measurements of human mandible: a cone beam CT study.

Authors:  N Ibrahim; A Parsa; B Hassan; P van der Stelt; I H A Aartman; P Nambiar
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  The assessment of trabecular bone parameters and cortical bone strength: a comparison of micro-CT and dental cone-beam CT.

Authors:  Jui-Ting Hsu; Shun-Ping Wang; Heng-Li Huang; Ying-Ju Chen; Jay Wu; Ming-Tzu Tsai
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2013-08-24       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Fractal dimension and architecture of trabecular bone.

Authors:  N L Fazzalari; I H Parkinson
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 7.996

4.  A retrospective multicenter evaluation of osseointegrated implants supporting overdentures.

Authors:  B Engquist; T Bergendal; T Kallus; U Linden
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Effects of immediate and delayed loading on peri-implant trabecular structures: a cone beam CT evaluation.

Authors:  Yan Huang; Jeroen Van Dessel; Xin Liang; Maarten Depypere; Weijian Zhong; Guowu Ma; Ivo Lambrichts; Frederik Maes; Reinhilde Jacobs
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 3.932

6.  Implant stability is affected by local bone microstructural quality.

Authors:  Andreas J Wirth; Jörg Goldhahn; Cyril Flaig; Peter Arbenz; Ralph Müller; G Harry van Lenthe
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  CBCT fractal dimension changes at the apex of immediate implants placed using undersized drilling.

Authors:  Oscar González-Martín; Ernesto A Lee; Mario Veltri
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 5.977

8.  Oral implant treatment in posterior partially edentulous jaws: a 5-year follow-up report.

Authors:  T Jemt; U Lekholm
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.804

9.  Rates of osseointegration of dental implants with regard to anatomical location.

Authors:  C J Drago
Journal:  J Prosthodont       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.752

10.  Morphometric analysis of human bone biopsies: a quantitative structural comparison of histological sections and micro-computed tomography.

Authors:  R Müller; H Van Campenhout; B Van Damme; G Van Der Perre; J Dequeker; T Hildebrand; P Rüegsegger
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 4.398

View more
  16 in total

1.  Computer-based automatic classification of trabecular bone pattern can assist radiographic bone quality assessment at dental implant site.

Authors:  Laura Ferreira Pinheiro Nicolielo; Jeroen Van Dessel; G Harry van Lenthe; Ivo Lambrichts; Reinhilde Jacobs
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Effect of exposure parameters and voxel size on bone structure analysis in CBCT.

Authors:  R Pauwels; T Faruangsaeng; T Charoenkarn; N Ngonphloy; S Panmekiate
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Does Drug Holiday Affect Jaw Trabeculation in Medication Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw? - A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Niranzena Panneer-Selvam; Abrar Alamoudi; Joseph Riley Iii; Joseph Katz
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2022-04-01

4.  Effect of different voxel sizes on the accuracy of CBCT measurements of trabecular bone microstructure: A comparative micro-CT study.

Authors:  Mahmure Ayşe Tayman; Kıvanç Kamburoğlu; Mert Ocak; Doğukan Özen
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2022-04-28

5.  High-resolution-cone beam tomography analysis of bone microarchitecture in patients with acromegaly and radiological vertebral fractures.

Authors:  Filippo Maffezzoni; Michele Maddalo; Stefano Frara; Monica Mezzone; Ivan Zorza; Fabio Baruffaldi; Francesco Doglietto; Gherardo Mazziotti; Roberto Maroldi; Andrea Giustina
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 3.633

6.  Difference in the artefacts production and the performance of the metal artefact reduction (MAR) tool between the buccal and lingual cortical plates adjacent to zirconium dental implant.

Authors:  Eduarda Helena Leandro Nascimento; Rocharles Cavalcante Fontenele; Gustavo Machado Santaella; Deborah Queiroz Freitas
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 2.419

7.  Quantitative analysis of metal artefacts of dental implant in CBCT image by correlation analysis to micro-CT: A microstructural study.

Authors:  Chang-Ki Min; Kyoung-A Kim
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 2.419

8.  Tomographic evaluation of the effect of simvastatin topical use on alveolar bone microarchitecture, pain and swelling after mandibular third molar extraction: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jiordanne Araújo Diniz; Davi da Silva Barbirato; Eduarda Helena Leandro do Nascimento; Andrea Dos Anjos Pontual; Ana Cláudia Amorim Gomes Dourado; José Rodrigues Laureano Filho
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Facilitated and Controlled Strontium Ranelate Delivery Using GCS-HA Nanocarriers Embedded into PEGDA Coupled with Decortication Driven Spinal Regeneration.

Authors:  Chih-Wei Chiang; Chih-Hwa Chen; Yankuba B Manga; Shao-Chan Huang; Kun-Mao Chao; Pei-Ru Jheng; Pei-Chun Wong; Batzaya Nyambat; Mantosh Kumar Satapathy; Er-Yuan Chuang
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2021-06-22

10.  The relationship between dental implant stability and trabecular bone structure using cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Se-Ryong Kang; Sung-Chul Bok; Soon-Chul Choi; Sam-Sun Lee; Min-Suk Heo; Kyung-Hoe Huh; Tae-Il Kim; Won-Jin Yi
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 2.614

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.