Literature DB >> 22282512

The influence of exposure parameters on jawbone model accuracy using cone beam CT and multislice CT.

B Vandenberghe1, S Luchsinger, J Hostens, E Dhoore, R Jacobs.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The main purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of exposure parameters on jawbone model accuracy when using cone beam CT (CBCT) and multislice CT (MSCT).
METHODS: A lower and an upper edentulous human cadaver jaw were scanned using micro-CT (Skyscan 1173 high energy spiral scan micro-CT; Skyscan NV, Kontich, Belgium) at 35 μm to serve as true reference. The in vitro samples were exposed using six CBCT units and one MSCT system. CBCT exposure protocols were chosen according to clinically available settings. The variables were kilovoltage, milliamperage, voxel size and/or scan time. Image segmentation was based on local thresholds using profile lines. The resulting jawbone segmentations were registered with the reference and image processing was done to internally fill the segmentations. A point-based distance calculation was performed between the three-dimensional objects and reference scans and deviation percentages were calculated for 2 mm, 1 mm and 0.5 mm intervals.
RESULTS: All points of the MSCT surface models lay within a 1 mm deviation range and 98.5% within 0.5 mm compared with micro-CT. For the different CBCT systems, accuracy came close to MSCT with mean percentages of 98.9% within 1 mm deviation and 92.8% within 0.5 mm. A difference of approximately 1% between lower and upper jaws could be perceived. For the specific CBCT exposure protocols, only scan time and voxel size revealed certain significant differences.
CONCLUSION: Jawbone model accuracy using CBCT was comparable with MSCT. The surface models of the upper jaws deviated slightly more than those for lower jaws. CBCT exposure settings had a limited influence on accuracy with scan time and voxel size as the main factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22282512      PMCID: PMC3520388          DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/81272805

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol        ISSN: 0250-832X            Impact factor:   2.419


  25 in total

Review 1.  Accuracy in computer-aided implant surgery--a review.

Authors:  Gerlig Widmann; Reto Josef Bale
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Assessment of bone segmentation quality of cone-beam CT versus multislice spiral CT: a pilot study.

Authors:  Miet Loubele; Frederik Maes; Filip Schutyser; Guy Marchal; Reinhilde Jacobs; Paul Suetens
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2006-04-21

3.  Accuracy of computer-aided oral implant surgery: a clinical and radiographic study.

Authors:  Francesco Valente; Guido Schiroli; Andrea Sbrenna
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Reliability of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical guides generated from computed tomography: clinical data from 94 implants.

Authors:  Ahmet Ersan Ersoy; Ilser Turkyilmaz; Oguz Ozan; Edwin A McGlumphy
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 6.993

5.  Accuracy of two stereolithographic guide systems for computer-aided implant placement: a computed tomography-based clinical comparative study.

Authors:  Volkan Arisan; Z Cuneyt Karabuda; Tayfun Ozdemir
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 6.993

6.  Comparative study of image quality for MSCT and CBCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial radiology applications.

Authors:  M Loubele; F Maes; R Jacobs; D van Steenberghe; S C White; P Suetens
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2008-06-26       Impact factor: 0.972

Review 7.  A systematic review on the accuracy and the clinical outcome of computer-guided template-based implant dentistry.

Authors:  David Schneider; Pascal Marquardt; Marcel Zwahlen; Ronald E Jung
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.977

Review 8.  The use of CT scan based planning for oral rehabilitation by means of implants and its transfer to the surgical field: a critical review on accuracy.

Authors:  M Vercruyssen; R Jacobs; N Van Assche; D van Steenberghe
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 3.837

9.  Accuracy assessment of computer-assisted flapless implant placement in partial edentulism.

Authors:  N Van Assche; D van Steenberghe; M Quirynen; R Jacobs
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 8.728

10.  Tolerance within a surgical guide.

Authors:  N Van Assche; M Quirynen
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 5.977

View more
  14 in total

1.  Development of a low-dose protocol for cone beam CT examinations of the anterior maxilla in children.

Authors:  Jose A Hidalgo Rivas; Keith Horner; Badri Thiruvenkatachari; Jonathan Davies; Chrysoula Theodorakou
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Influence of object location in different FOVs on trabecular bone microstructure measurements of human mandible: a cone beam CT study.

Authors:  N Ibrahim; A Parsa; B Hassan; P van der Stelt; I H A Aartman; P Nambiar
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  3D dento-maxillary osteolytic lesion and active contour segmentation pilot study in CBCT: semi-automatic vs manual methods.

Authors:  K Vallaeys; A Kacem; H Legoux; M Le Tenier; C Hamitouche; R Arbab-Chirani
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Volume reduction of cystic lesions after surgical decompression: a computerised three-dimensional computed tomographic evaluation.

Authors:  Giuseppe Lizio; Anna Freni Sterrantino; Sara Ragazzini; Claudio Marchetti
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 5.  A Diagnosis of Maxillary Sinus Fracture with Cone-Beam CT: Case Report and Literature Review.

Authors:  Selmi Yardimci Yilmaz; Melda Misirlioglu; Mehmet Zahit Adisen
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2014-03-04

6.  Three-dimensional maxillary virtual patient creation by convolutional neural network-based segmentation on cone-beam computed tomography images.

Authors:  Fernanda Nogueira-Reis; Nermin Morgan; Stefanos Nomidis; Adriaan Van Gerven; Nicolly Oliveira-Santos; Reinhilde Jacobs; Cinthia Pereira Machado Tabchoury
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-09-17       Impact factor: 3.606

7.  Manufacturing Polymer Model of Anatomical Structures with Increased Accuracy Using CAx and AM Systems for Planning Orthopedic Procedures.

Authors:  Paweł Turek; Damian Filip; Łukasz Przeszłowski; Artur Łazorko; Grzegorz Budzik; Sławomir Snela; Mariusz Oleksy; Jarosław Jabłoński; Jarosław Sęp; Katarzyna Bulanda; Sławomir Wolski; Andrzej Paszkiewicz
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 4.967

Review 8.  Dose optimization by altering the operating potential and tube current exposure time product in dental cone beam CT: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rebekah Goulston; Jonathan Davies; Keith Horner; Frederick Murphy
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 2.419

9.  Cone-beam computed tomography and microtomography for alveolar bone measurements.

Authors:  Nathália Ferrare; André Ferreira Leite; Hugo César Pinto Marques Caracas; Ricardo Bentes de Azevedo; Nilce Santos de Melo; Paulo Tadeu de Souza Figueiredo
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 1.246

10.  Comparison of cartilage and bone morphological models of the ankle joint derived from different medical imaging technologies.

Authors:  Gilda Durastanti; Alberto Leardini; Sorin Siegler; Stefano Durante; Alberto Bazzocchi; Claudio Belvedere
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2019-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.