Donald E Spratt1, Pascal Mercier, Gary S Shaw. 1. Department of Biochemistry, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract
The ubiquitin-signaling pathway utilizes E1 activating, E2 conjugating, and E3 ligase enzymes to sequentially transfer the small modifier protein ubiquitin to a substrate protein. During the last step of this cascade different types of E3 ligases either act as scaffolds to recruit an E2 enzyme and substrate (RING), or form an ubiquitin-thioester intermediate prior to transferring ubiquitin to a substrate (HECT). The RING-inBetweenRING-RING (RBR) proteins constitute a unique group of E3 ubiquitin ligases that includes the Human Homologue of Drosophila Ariadne (HHARI). These E3 ligases are proposed to use a hybrid RING/HECT mechanism whereby the enzyme uses facets of both the RING and HECT enzymes to transfer ubiquitin to a substrate. We now present the solution structure of the HHARI RING2 domain, the key portion of this E3 ligase required for the RING/HECT hybrid mechanism. The structure shows the domain possesses two Zn²⁺-binding sites and a single exposed cysteine used for ubiquitin catalysis. A structural comparison of the RING2 domain with the HECT E3 ligase NEDD4 reveals a near mirror image of the cysteine and histidine residues in the catalytic site. Further, a tandem pair of aromatic residues exists near the C-terminus of the HHARI RING2 domain that is conserved in other RBR E3 ligases. One of these aromatic residues is remotely located from the catalytic site that is reminiscent of the location found in HECT E3 enzymes where it is used for ubiquitin catalysis. These observations provide an initial structural rationale for the RING/HECT hybrid mechanism for ubiquitination used by the RBR E3 ligases.
The ubiquitin-signaling pathway utilizes E1 activating, E2 conjugating, and E3 ligase enzymes to sequentially transfer the small modifier protein ubiquitin to a substrate protein. During the last step of this cascade different types of E3 ligases either act as scaffolds to recruit an E2 enzyme and substrate (RING), or form an ubiquitin-thioester intermediate prior to transferring ubiquitin to a substrate (HECT). The RING-inBetweenRING-RING (RBR) proteins constitute a unique group of E3 ubiquitin ligases that includes the Human Homologue of Drosophila Ariadne (HHARI). These E3 ligases are proposed to use a hybrid RING/HECT mechanism whereby the enzyme uses facets of both the RING and HECT enzymes to transfer ubiquitin to a substrate. We now present the solution structure of the HHARIRING2 domain, the key portion of this E3 ligase required for the RING/HECT hybrid mechanism. The structure shows the domain possesses two Zn²⁺-binding sites and a single exposed cysteine used for ubiquitin catalysis. A structural comparison of the RING2 domain with the HECT E3 ligase NEDD4 reveals a near mirror image of the cysteine and histidine residues in the catalytic site. Further, a tandem pair of aromatic residues exists near the C-terminus of the HHARIRING2 domain that is conserved in other RBR E3 ligases. One of these aromatic residues is remotely located from the catalytic site that is reminiscent of the location found in HECT E3 enzymes where it is used for ubiquitin catalysis. These observations provide an initial structural rationale for the RING/HECT hybrid mechanism for ubiquitination used by the RBR E3 ligases.
The ubiquitin-signaling pathway plays a vital role in intracellular signaling and
protein turnover in the cell. This pathway involves a cascade of enzymes (E1
ubiquitin-activating, E2 ubiquitin-conjugating, and E3 ubiquitin ligase) to
sequentially transfer an ubiquitin moiety to a target protein by forming an
isopeptide bond between the C-terminus of ubiquitin and an ε-amide of a lysine on
the substrate protein or growing ubiquitin chain [1]. The E3 ligases, which are responsible for recognizing the substrate
protein and ubiquitin attachment specificity, have generally been classified under
two different categories depending upon their structure and mechanism. For instance,
the Really Interesting New Gene (RING) and U-box E3 ligases act as scaffolds to
properly orient an E2 ~ ubiquitin thioester complex to transfer its ubiquitin cargo
to a substrate [2,3]. In contrast, the Homologous to E6AP Carboxyl Terminus (HECT)
E3 ligases play a more direct role in ubiquitin transfer by forming a catalytic
thioester intermediate with the C-terminus of ubiquitin before it is transferred to
a substrate [4,5].The RING-inBetweenRING-RING (RBR) E3 ubiquitin ligases [6,7] are a unique group of
E3 ligases that include two putative RING domains separated by an inBetweenRING
(IBR) domain (ie. RING1-IBR-RING2) near their C-termini. Originally these enzymes
were thought to function in a similar manner as the RING E3 ligases with either the
RING1 or RING2 domain acting as an adaptor to facilitate ubiquitin transfer from the
E2 enzyme to a substrate. More recently, it has been shown that several RBR E3
ligases including HHARI, parkin, and heme-oxidized-IRP2 ubiquitin ligase 1
interacting protein (HOIP) use a unique hybrid mechanism combining aspects from both
the RING and HECT E3 ligases [8-10]. In this hybrid mechanism, the RING1 domain
is proposed to recruit the E2 enzymeUbcH7 and facilitate the transthiolation of
ubiquitin to a conserved cysteine within the RING2 domain, prior to ubiquitin
off-loading to a substrate protein [8-11].Humanhomolog of Drosophila Ariadne-1 (HHARI/ARI1) is a member of
the RBR E3 ligase family involved in the ubiquitylation of substrate proteins
including single-minded 2 (SIM2) [12] and
translation initiation factor 4E homologous protein (4EHP) [13]. Recent studies have shown that HHARI is highly expressed
in the nucleus and promotes cellular proliferation [14] and is susceptible to oxidative damage leading to HHARI insolubility
[15]. The gene homolog in
,
Ariadne-1, is expressed in all tissues during development. Null
alleles markedly shorten life expectancy and substitutions of conserved cysteines
throughout the RBR sequence are lethal [16].
HHARI has been shown to interact with the E2 conjugating enzymesUbcH7, UbcH8, UbcM4
and UbcD10 in human, mouse and fly [16-19]. It has also been demonstrated that the
RING1 and IBR domains of HHARI are required for E2 recruitment [16,18,19] and that modifying the
linker between the RING1 and IBR domains or substituting the RING1 domain of HHARI
with its RING/RING1 cognate from c-Cbl or parkin abolishes HHARI’s ability to
interact with UbcH7 [18].In this work we have determined the three-dimensional solution structure of the
catalytic RING2 domain from HHARI. We show that HHARIRING2 forms a compact
structure that features two bound zinc ions that does not resemble a typical RING E3
ligase fold. A key observation to the RING2 fold is the presence of aromatic
residues that maintain the protein structure and are present in all RING2 domains
for the RBR E3 ligase family. Further we show that an exposed loop, carrying the
catalytic cysteine and an adjacent histidine residue, is poised to accept and
transfer ubiquitin reminiscent of a similar region found in HECT E3 ligases.
Materials and Methods
Protein expression and purification
The RING2 domain of humanHHARI (residues 325-396) with a C357S substitution was
synthesized by DNA 2.0 (Menlo Park, CA, USA) and cloned into a modified
pGEX-6P-2 vector having an N-terminal GST tag followed by a TEV
cleavage site (ENLYFQ), as previously described [11]. The GST-TEV-HHARIRING2 construct was transformed into
BL21(DE3)-RIL (Stratagene) and grown at
37°C in M9 media supplemented with 15NH4Cl (1 g/L),
13C6-glucose (2 g/L), 100 µg/mL ampicillin and 34
µg/mL chloramphenicol. When the culture OD600 reached 0.6, the media
was supplemented with 500 µM ZnCl2 and the temperature was dropped to
16°C. Once the cells reached an OD600 of 0.8, the cultures were
induced with 1 mM IPTG at 16°C for 20 hours. Cells were harvested by
centrifugation at 6000 x g for 10 minutes at 4°C.Cell pellets were re-suspended in 20 mL wash buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, 120 mM NaCl,
5 mM DTT, pH 7.4) with 1 mM PMSF and an EDTA-free protease inhibitor tablet
(Roche, Mississauga, Ontario), lysed using an EmulsiFlex-C5 homogenizer
(Avestin, Ottawa, Ontario), and clarified by centrifugation (38,000 rpm for 1 hr
at 4°C). The supernatant was then filtered (0.45 m, Millipore, Mississauga, ON,
Canada) and loaded onto a 5µ mL GSTrap FF column (GE Healthcare)
pre-equilibrated with wash buffer at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min using an AKTA
FPLC (GE Healthcare). After the column was washed with 20 column volumes of wash
buffer at 3 mL/min, the protein was eluted with elution buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl,
120 mM NaCl, 10 mM glutathione, pH 7.4) at a flow rate of 2 mL/min. Fractions
containing eluted protein were pooled and TEV protease was added to cleave the
GST tag (1 mg TEV/50 mg protein) for 1 hour at 25°C. The TEV-cleaved protein was
dialysed against 20 mM Tris-HCl, 120 mM NaCl, pH 8.5 at 25°C, followed by
dialysis against wash buffer overnight at 4°C. The protein solution was then
loaded onto a 5 mL GSTrap FF column at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min and the
flowthrough containing the HHARIRING2 domain was pooled. The protein was
concentrated and loaded onto a HiLoad 16/60 Superdex75 prepgrade column
equilibrated with 20 mM MES-NaOH, 120 mM NaCl, 5 mM DTT, pH 6.5 at a flow rate
of 1 mL/min. Fractions containing the pure 15N,13C-labeled
HHARIRING2 domain were pooled and concentrated. The resulting HHARIRING2
protein contained an additional “GS” at its N-termini as a result of its cloning
and TEV cleavage. After purification, the concentration of humanHHARIRING2
were determined using the better Bradford assay (Bio-Rad).
NMR Spectroscopy
NMR samples for assignment and structure calculation of
15N,13C-labeled humanHHARIRING2 were prepared in 20
mM MES-NaOH, 120 mM NaCl, 5 mM DTT, 10% D2O/90% H2O at pH
6.5. Samples were concentrated by ultrafiltration (Millipore, Mississauga, ON,
Canada) to a final volume of 300 µL and transferred into a Shigemi tube.
Imidazole (2 mM) was added to the sample as a pH indicator [20] to ensure that the pH of the sample did
not change during data acquisition.All NMR data were collected at 25°C using a Varian Inova 600 MHz NMR spectrometer
equipped with a triple resonance probe and z-field gradients. Backbone and side
chain assignments for HHARIRING2 were determined from the following experiments
collected using the standard pulse sequences from the Varian Biopack:
1H-15N HSQC [21], aliphatic and aromatic 1H-13C HSQC [21,22], HNCO, HNCA, HNCACB [23],
CBCA(CO)NH [24], and aliphatic and
aromatic HCCH-TOCSY [25].
15N-NOESY-HSQC experiments were collected with mixing times of 150
ms. 13C-NOESY-HSQC aliphatic and aromatic experiments were collected
in 100% D2O using mixing times of 100 ms. Data were processed using
NMRPipe and NMRDraw [26] and analyzed
using NMRViewJ [27].
2,2-dimethyl-2-silapentane-5-sulfonate salt (DSS) was used as the internal
standard and referenced at 0 ppm, while 13C and 15N
chemical shifts were indirectly referenced to DSS [28]. The NMR assignments for HHARIRING2 domain have been
deposited to the Biological Magnetic Resonance Databank () under accession
code 19315.
Structure calculations and refinement
Structures for HHARIRING2 were calculated from a combination of manual and
automatic NOE assignments using the program CYANA [29]. The standard CYANA protocol for automated structures
was used with default settings involving eight cycles of structure generation
and refinement (100 structures/round). Zn2+-coordinating cysteine
residues were identified using Cα and Cβ chemical shifts [30] and the tautomeric state of histidine residues was
determined from Cδ chemical shifts [31].
To not bias the fold of the domain, initial calculations were performed without
any Zn2+-ion restraints. Once the fold was observed using only NOE
distance restraints, zinc atoms were then added using virtual linkers and
restraints between atom pairs (Zn–Sγ, Sγ–Cβ, His Nε2–Sγ and Sγ–Sγ) were imposed
to maintain proper tetrahedral geometry around the zinc ion [32]. The final 50 calculated structures
were water refined using a modified force field in Xplor-NIH [33,34] as previously described [11]. The 20 structures with the lowest NOE energies were chosen as
representative of the calculation and were analyzed using Procheck [35] and MolProbity 4 [36] online software. The structures had a Molprobity score
of 2.8 and clash score of 14.1. The atomic coordinates and structural restraints
for HHARIRING2 have been deposited in the RCSB Protein Data Bank () under accession code
2M9Y.
Results and Discussion
Structure of the HHARI RING2 Domain
Initial characterization of the humanHHARIRING2 domain (residues K325-D396)
used a C357S substitution to limit protein oxidation. The C357S substituted
HHARI has been shown to successfully capture the C-terminus of ubiquitin and
form an ester complex [10]. Examination
of the HHARIRING2 domain by 1H-15N HSQC spectroscopy
(Figure 1) showed
dispersed amide resonances indicative of a well-folded protein. The addition of
EDTA to the sample resulted in a collapse of the signals concurrent with
significant changes in their intensity indicative of protein unfolding. For
example, HHARIRING2 contains eight cysteine residues and four tryptophan
residues that are found at well-separated positions in the native spectrum but
are poorly resolved in the presence of EDTA. Since mass spectrometry experiments
have shown that the HHARIRING2 domain coordinates two zinc ions [11], this indicates that zinc ion
coordination is required for the correct folding of the HHARIRING2 domain.
Figure 1
The HHARI RING2 domain structure is maintained by zinc
binding.
(A) Assigned 600 MHz 1H-15N HSQC
spectrum of 15N,13C-labeled HHARI RING2 (C357S)
domain (20 mM MES, 120 mM NaCl, 5 mM DTT, 10% D2O/90%
H2O, pH 6.5) labeled using the one-letter amino acid code
and residue number according to the human HHARI sequence.
(B) 1H-15N HSQC spectrum of the
HHARI RING2 (C357S) domain (20 mM MES, 120 mM NaCl, 5 mM DTT, 10%
D2O/90% H2O, pH 6.5) in the presence of 4 mM
EDTA. The collapsed amide peaks in the 1H dimension represent
the unfolding of the protein due to the chelation of the structural
Zn2+-ions.
The HHARI RING2 domain structure is maintained by zinc
binding.
(A) Assigned 600 MHz 1H-15N HSQC
spectrum of 15N,13C-labeled HHARIRING2 (C357S)
domain (20 mM MES, 120 mM NaCl, 5 mM DTT, 10% D2O/90%
H2O, pH 6.5) labeled using the one-letter amino acid code
and residue number according to the humanHHARI sequence.
(B) 1H-15N HSQC spectrum of the
HHARIRING2 (C357S) domain (20 mM MES, 120 mM NaCl, 5 mM DTT, 10%
D2O/90% H2O, pH 6.5) in the presence of 4 mM
EDTA. The collapsed amide peaks in the 1H dimension represent
the unfolding of the protein due to the chelation of the structural
Zn2+-ions.The solution structure of the HHARIRING2 domain was determined using a
combination of NMR spectroscopy and structure calculations. In all, >95% of
backbone and side chain assignments were determined for HHARIRING2 (Table 1) using standard triple-resonance
NMR experiments. The structure determination used 15N and
13C-edited NOESY experiments that provided about 1500
non-redundant distance restraints as input for calculations (Table 1). The high number of distance
measurements (~20 per residue) allowed structures to be calculated without
accessory angular restraints. Initial structures were calculated in the absence
of any Zn2+-ion restraints so as to not bias the fold of the domain.
However, the identities of Zn2+-coordinating residues were obvious
from chemical shift analysis of cysteine [30] and histidine [31]
residues. The resulting family of 20 structures (Figure 2A) demonstrated that residues
N335-C389 of HHARIRING2 form a well-structured domain (RMSD 0.65 Å) with a
single turn α-helix (α1, N335-A339) followed by four well-defined βstrands (β1,
T341-C344; β2, V349-E352; β3, H359-V361; and β4, E370-C372) (Figure 2B). The
N- (K325-S334) and C-termini (R391-D396) of HHARIRING2 are
disordered as supported by their chemical shift data and lack of long-range
NOEs. Two Zn2+-binding sites are clearly present involving four
cysteine residues found in the loops between β1-β2 and β3-β4 (Site I; C344,
C347, C362, C367) and three cysteines and a histidine in the extended loop after
β4 (Site II; C372, C375, H382, C389). This linear Zn2+-binding
coordination is similar to that observed for the solution structure of the RING2
domain from the RBR E3 ligase parkin [11].
Table 1
Structural Statistics for 20 lowest energy structures of the HHARI
RING2 Domain.
Completeness of Resonance Assignments
Backbone (N, CA)
(141/145) -97.2%
Sidechain (C,H)
(522/540) -95.6%
HN
(68/71) -95.8%
HA
(76/79) -96.1%
HB
(122/122) -100%
NMR distance and dihedral constraints
Distance constraints
Total
1483
Intra-residue
364
Inter-residue
Sequential (|i -j| = 1)
444
Medium-range (1<|i -j| <
5)
194
Long-range (|i -j| ≥ 5)
481
Intermolecular
0
Zinc coordination restraints
24
Structure statistics1
Violations
Distance constraints (> 0.1 Å)
0
Deviations from idealized geometry3
Bond lengths (Å)
0.006
Bond angles (°)
0.56
Impropers (°)
0.74
Ramachandran Statistics2
Most favored
70.0%
Additionally favored
29.2%
Generously favored
0.7%
Disallowed
0.1%
RMSD to Mean Structure (Å)3
Backbone
0.6 ± 0.2
Heavy
0.8 ± 0.2
1 Using all residues, as reported by Xplor-NIH
2 As reported by Procheck
3 Using residues W336-C389 (inclusive)
Figure 2
Solution Structure of the HHARI RING2 domain.
(A) Superposition of the 20 lowest energy solution
structures of the HHARI RING2 domain (residues 325-396; backbone RMSD
0.6 ± 0.2 Å). (B) Ribbon structure of the HHARI RING2
domain showing helix α1 (N335-A339) and β-strands β1 (T341-C344), β2
(V349-E352), β3 (H359-361), and β4 (E370-C372). Zinc is represented as
silver spheres. Side chains of residues involved in
Zn2+-coordination and the catalytic cysteine substituted with
serine (C357S) are labeled and shown in yellow.
1 Using all residues, as reported by Xplor-NIH2 As reported by Procheck3 Using residues W336-C389 (inclusive)
Solution Structure of the HHARI RING2 domain.
(A) Superposition of the 20 lowest energy solution
structures of the HHARIRING2 domain (residues 325-396; backbone RMSD
0.6 ± 0.2 Å). (B) Ribbon structure of the HHARIRING2
domain showing helix α1 (N335-A339) and β-strands β1 (T341-C344), β2
(V349-E352), β3 (H359-361), and β4 (E370-C372). Zinc is represented as
silver spheres. Side chains of residues involved in
Zn2+-coordination and the catalytic cysteine substituted with
serine (C357S) are labeled and shown in yellow.Our structure of the HHARIRING2 domain does not resemble a previously determined
structure [37] where only a single
Zn2+ ion was coordinated (Site I) and the C-terminus was largely
unstructured. This is likely due to our NMR assignment of resonances for
aromatic residues, and resulting NOEs, which constitute a large portion of the
C-terminus of HHARIRING2 (vide infra). This is manifested in
differences in the second Zn2+-binding site where the current
structure shows ligation through C372, C375, H382, and C389 not observed in the
previous work. It is also possible that the observed structural differences
could result from different loadings of zinc into site II of the HHARIRING2
domain. This site has Cys2-His–Cys coordinating ligands shown to have
about a three-fold lower zinc affinity than a Cys4 geometry (Site I)
in zinc finger peptides [38]. A partial
occupancy of zinc may have contributed to sample heterogeneity and resulted in
incomplete backbone and aromatic assignments in earlier work. We also found that
the 1H-15N HSQC spectrum of HHARIRING2 was markedly
improved at the lower pH (pH 6.5) used in the current work compared to pH 8
where the previous work was completed [37].The HHARIRING2 structure shows a single solvent-exposed cysteine (C357;
substituted to a serine in our construct, C357S) in the loop between β2-β3 that
is not involved in Zn2+-coordination. This residue has been shown to
form a covalent thioester with ubiquitin transferred from the E2 enzymeUbcH7
[10]. The resulting RING2~ubiquitin
species is a required intermediate for the ubiquitin chain-building process to
occur by HHARI. In a C357S substituted protein, it is also possible to form a
more stable ester with the C-terminal carboxylate of ubiquitin although
ubiquitin chain formation occurs more poorly [10]. Similar observations have been made for the RBR E3 ligases
parkin [11] and HOIP [8,9]
that also possess a conserved cysteine residue in their sequences.
Conserved Aromatic Residues Maintain the HHARI RING2 Domain Structure
The structure of the HHARIRING2 domain shows several aromatic residues that are
located near the core of the protein structure (Figure 3A). For example, W373 is found near
Zn2+-binding site II that makes numerous NOE contacts with two
conserved lysine residues K342 and K353 (Figure 3B). Other examples include W379 and
Y387 located near the C-terminus of HHARIRING2 that make contacts within the
loop containing the catalytic cysteine (C357S, H359) and Zn2+-binding
site II (C372, C389), respectively. For the NMR structure determination,
complete resonance assignments of all aromatic residues in HHARIRING2 were
required in order to properly determine this conformation, a feature lacking in
the earlier HHARI structure [37].
Figure 3
Conserved residues in the hydrophobic core of HHARI RING2 are
conserved in all RBR RING2 domains.
(A) The location of aromatic residues and key contacts in
the core of the HHARI RING2 domain structure are shown for F371 and W373
(magenta), residues contacting F371 and W373 in the core (cyan), and all
other aromatic residues (yellow). (B) Representative
aromatic 1H-1H NOE strip plots for W373 Hζ2, W379
Hζ3, and Y387 Hε1 that make NOE contacts within the core, the β2–β3 loop
containing the catalytic cysteine, and Zn2+-binding site II,
respectively. (C) Sequence alignment of HHARI RING2
orthologs and representative RBR RING2 paralogs. Conserved aromatic
residues in the core are colored as in panel A. Cysteine and histidine
residues that coordinate Zn2+ (grey) are highlighted.
Conserved residues corresponding to W379 and the tandem aromatic pair
found towards the C-termini of the RBR sequences are highlighted in
yellow (ie. W386 and Y387 in HHARI).
Conserved residues in the hydrophobic core of HHARI RING2 are
conserved in all RBR RING2 domains.
(A) The location of aromatic residues and key contacts in
the core of the HHARIRING2 domain structure are shown for F371 and W373
(magenta), residues contacting F371 and W373 in the core (cyan), and all
other aromatic residues (yellow). (B) Representative
aromatic 1H-1HNOE strip plots for W373 Hζ2, W379
Hζ3, and Y387 Hε1 that make NOE contacts within the core, the β2–β3 loop
containing the catalytic cysteine, and Zn2+-binding site II,
respectively. (C) Sequence alignment of HHARIRING2
orthologs and representative RBR RING2 paralogs. Conserved aromatic
residues in the core are colored as in panel A. Cysteine and histidine
residues that coordinate Zn2+ (grey) are highlighted.
Conserved residues corresponding to W379 and the tandem aromatic pair
found towards the C-termini of the RBR sequences are highlighted in
yellow (ie. W386 and Y387 in HHARI).The RING2 domain of HHARI contains an unusually high percentage of aromatic
residues (14%; 10 aromatic of 71 amino acids). We examined other RBR proteins to
determine if a similar trend occurred for aromatic residues that were important
for maintenance of the protein fold. Figure 3C shows that aromatic residues at
F371, W373 and W379 are well conserved through different RBR proteins. For
example, in both cases the tryptophan residue (W379 in HHARI, W453 in parkin) is
juxtaposed to a conserved histidine (H359 HHARI, H433 in parkin) found in the
β2-β3 loop that also carries the catalytic cysteine residue. This raises the
possibility that W379 in HHARIRING2 may play an important role, whether
directly or indirectly, in the ubiquitin transfer mechanism by the RBR E3
ligases.Interestingly, several RBR E3 ligases also contain a tandem pair of aromatic
residues near the C-terminal part of their Zn2+-binding site II
(W386, Y387 in HHARI). This region is not obviously conserved through sequence
alignment due to differential spacing of the last two
Zn2+-coordinating residues and likely accounts for the inability of
the C-terminus of HHARI to substitute for a similar region in parkin [39]. Nevertheless, the tandem aromatic
residues appear to occupy similar spatial positions in the solution structures
of the HHARI and parkinRING2 domains [11]. Based on the recent high resolution structure of parkin [40] the importance of one of the tandem
aromatic residues has now been examined for this RBR E3 ligase. The structure
shows the conserved phenylalanine -3 residues from the C-terminus of parkin
(F463, equivalent to Y387 in HHARI) is involved in interactions with the RING0
domain. These interactions can be relieved when F463 is substituted with a
tyrosine [40] leading to increased
ubiquitination or covalent modification using a vinyl-sulfone probe. Likewise,
the substitution of the final three residues of parkin containing F463 have been
shown to be integral for proper folding and enzyme activity [39]. Future studies to examine the tandem
aromatic residues near the C-terminus of the HHARIRING2 domain will be
paramount to shed further light on their importance in RBR-dependent ubiquitin
transfer.
The RING2 Structure is a Conserved Feature of RBR E3 Ligase Proteins
We compared the solution structure of the HHARIRING2 domain with the solution
structures of the parkinRING2 domain [11], and IBR domains from parkin [32] and HOIP (PDB accession code 2CT7). As shown in Figure 4, all four structures
have a similar fold when compared to the HHARIRING2 structure (backbone RMSD
parkinRING2 = 0.84 Å, parkin IBR = 1.38 Å, and HOIP IBR = 1.15 Å). The location
of the catalytic cysteine within the loop between β2 and β3 is nearly identical
for HHARI and parkinRING2 domains (Figure 4A; C357 in HHARI; C449 in fly parkin). The cysteine residue
is conserved in all RING2 domains and suggests that the catalytic mechanism
employed by each RBR is likely similar. Interestingly, even though the IBR
domains from parkin and HOIP show a similar fold, both domains are lacking this
cysteine residue.
Figure 4
Superposition of HHARI RING2 domain with other RBR domains.
The solution structure of the HHARI RING2 domain is oriented as in Figure 2B (grey) with
N- and C-termini labeled. Solution structures of
(A) parkin RING2 domain (PDB accession code 2LWR),
(B) parkin IBR domain (PDB 2JMO), and (C)
HOIP IBR domain (PDB 2CT7) are shown in white with N-
and C-termini labeled (N’, C’). The
conserved cysteine found in both the HHARI and parkin RING2 domains
(yellow, panel A), is noticeably absent in the IBR domains.
Superposition of HHARI RING2 domain with other RBR domains.
The solution structure of the HHARIRING2 domain is oriented as in Figure 2B (grey) with
N- and C-termini labeled. Solution structures of
(A) parkinRING2 domain (PDB accession code 2LWR),
(B) parkin IBR domain (PDB 2JMO), and (C)
HOIP IBR domain (PDB 2CT7) are shown in white with N-
and C-termini labeled (N’, C’). The
conserved cysteine found in both the HHARI and parkinRING2 domains
(yellow, panel A), is noticeably absent in the IBR domains.The comparison of the HHARIRING2 domain structure with other IBR and RING2
domains indicates the most common features are the β-sheet structure near the
center of the domains and the location of the two Zn2+ ions. There is
variability of the spacing between ligating residues in both metal-ion sites
leading to longer loops between the first and third pairs of ligands in site I
(for example, the HHARIRING2 compared with the parkin IBR structure, Figure 4B). In addition the
tandem pair of aromatic residues found near the C-terminus of the HHARIRING2
domain is absent from the IBR structures.
The HHARI RING2 Structure shows a Glimpse of HECT Domain Structure
A current proposal is that HHARI and its RBR paralogs carry out the
ubiquitination of their substrates using a hybrid mechanism combining aspects
from both the RING and HECT E3 ligase families [8-10]. This is supported by
biochemical assays that show a conserved cysteine found in all RBR RING2 domains
can form a thioester (or non-reducible ester when substituted with serine) with
ubiquitin adducts suggesting that the RING2 is the catalytic moiety in RBR
proteins [8-10].The hybrid mechanism would suggest that some structural features of a HECT E3
ligase might exist within the RING2 domain of HHARI or other RBR E3 ligases. In
order to examine this, we compared the catalytic region of HHARI with that of
the HECT E3 ligase NEDD4 [41]. As shown
in Figure 5, some similarity
exists within the catalytic portions of both proteins, although the two proteins
appear to be mirror images of each other. In both cases, a catalytic cysteine
(C357 in HHARI; C867 in NEDD4) lies within a loop between two antiparallel
β-strands. Further, both E3 ligases feature a histidine residue located two
residues prior to the cysteine in the case of NEDD4 (H865) or afterwards for
HHARI (H359) and parkin (H433). Substitution of H920 in NEDD4L affects the
transthiolation reaction from the E2 enzyme to the catalytic cysteine [42] while substitution of H433 in parkin
nullifies the polyubiquitin reaction [11] and severely reduces reactivity to a
ubiquitin vinyl-sulfone probe [40].
Further, in NEDD4 it has been shown that substitution of a single conserved
phenylalanine (F896) located about 30 residues past the catalytic cysteine
blocks ubiquitin transfer to the substrate [43]. This residue has been suggested to orient the thioester-bound
ubiquitin or move closer to the catalytic site during ubiquitin transfer [41,43]. It is interesting that W386 in the HHARI domain (W462 in
parkin) within the conserved tandem aromatic pair of the RING2 domain might
fulfill such a role in the HECT/RING hybrid mechanism since this residue is
located about 30 residues C-terminal to the catalytic cysteine and occupies a
near mirror image position compared to F896 in NEDD4. These intriguing
observations show there are some structural similarities between HECT E3 ligases
and the RING2 domains from HHARI and parkin that are consistent with a HECT/RING
hybrid mechanism. These results provide a framework for future experiments to
further unravel the hybrid mechanism used by the RBR E3 ligases.
Figure 5
Structural similarities between catalytic regions of the HHARI RING2
domain and the HECT C-terminal lobe.
Superposition of the HHARI RING2 domain (residues I353-C362, cyan) with
the NEDD4 HECT domain (PDB 4BBN; residues P861-D871, magenta). The
catalytic cysteine residues are each located near the center of the loop
connecting an antiparallel β-sheet (β2-β3 in HHARI). Histidine residues
shown to be important in ubiquitination (H359 for HHARI, H865 for NEDD4)
are located two residues away from the catalytic cysteine. In HHARI, an
aromatic residue (W386) conserved as part of a tandem aromatic pair in
RBR E3 ligases is indicated. A similar aromatic residue (F896) in NEDD4
is required for ubiquitin transfer to a substrate.
Structural similarities between catalytic regions of the HHARI RING2
domain and the HECT C-terminal lobe.
Superposition of the HHARIRING2 domain (residues I353-C362, cyan) with
the NEDD4 HECT domain (PDB 4BBN; residues P861-D871, magenta). The
catalytic cysteine residues are each located near the center of the loop
connecting an antiparallel β-sheet (β2-β3 in HHARI). Histidine residues
shown to be important in ubiquitination (H359 for HHARI, H865 for NEDD4)
are located two residues away from the catalytic cysteine. In HHARI, an
aromatic residue (W386) conserved as part of a tandem aromatic pair in
RBR E3 ligases is indicated. A similar aromatic residue (F896) in NEDD4
is required for ubiquitin transfer to a substrate.
Authors: Fatima Elmehdawi; Gabrielle Wheway; Katarzyna Szymanska; Matthew Adams; Alec S High; Colin A Johnson; Philip A Robinson Journal: Exp Cell Res Date: 2012-10-08 Impact factor: 3.905
Authors: D S Wishart; C G Bigam; J Yao; F Abildgaard; H J Dyson; E Oldfield; J L Markley; B D Sykes Journal: J Biomol NMR Date: 1995-09 Impact factor: 2.835
Authors: David M Duda; Jennifer L Olszewski; Jonathan P Schuermann; Igor Kurinov; Darcie J Miller; Amanda Nourse; Arno F Alpi; Brenda A Schulman Journal: Structure Date: 2013-05-23 Impact factor: 5.006
Authors: Katherine H Reiter; Alex Zelter; Maria K Janowska; Michael Riffle; Nicholas Shulman; Brendan X MacLean; Kaipo Tamura; Matthew C Chambers; Michael J MacCoss; Trisha N Davis; Miklos Guttman; Peter S Brzovic; Rachel E Klevit Journal: Structure Date: 2022-06-17 Impact factor: 5.871
Authors: Bernhard C Lechtenberg; Akhil Rajput; Ruslan Sanishvili; Małgorzata K Dobaczewska; Carl F Ware; Peter D Mace; Stefan J Riedl Journal: Nature Date: 2016-01-20 Impact factor: 49.962