PURPOSE: To evaluate influence of variation in spatio-temporal resolution and scan-rescan reproducibility on three-dimensional (3D) visualization and quantification of arterial and portal venous (PV) liver hemodynamics at four-dimensional (4D) flow MRI. METHODS: Scan-rescan reproducibility of 3D hemodynamic analysis of the liver was evaluated in 10 healthy volunteers using 4D flow MRI at 3T with three different spatio-temporal resolutions (2.4 × 2.0 × 2.4 mm(3), 61.2 ms; 2.5 × 2.0 × 2.4 mm(3), 81.6 ms; 2.6 × 2.5 × 2.6 mm(3), 80 ms) and thus different total scan times. Qualitative flow analysis used 3D streamlines and time-resolved particle traces. Quantitative evaluation was based on maximum and mean velocities, flow volume, and vessel lumen area in the hepatic arterial and PV systems. RESULTS: 4D flow MRI showed good interobserver variability for assessment of arterial and PV liver hemodynamics. 3D flow visualization revealed limitations for the left intrahepatic PV branch. Lower spatio-temporal resolution resulted in underestimation of arterial velocities (mean 15%, P < 0.05). For the PV system, hemodynamic analyses showed significant differences in the velocities for intrahepatic portal vein vessels (P < 0.05). Scan-rescan reproducibility was good except for flow volumes in the arterial system. CONCLUSION: 4D flow MRI for assessment of liver hemodynamics can be performed with low interobserver variability and good reproducibility. Higher spatio-temporal resolution is necessary for complete assessment of the hepatic blood flow required for clinical applications.
PURPOSE: To evaluate influence of variation in spatio-temporal resolution and scan-rescan reproducibility on three-dimensional (3D) visualization and quantification of arterial and portal venous (PV) liver hemodynamics at four-dimensional (4D) flow MRI. METHODS: Scan-rescan reproducibility of 3D hemodynamic analysis of the liver was evaluated in 10 healthy volunteers using 4D flow MRI at 3T with three different spatio-temporal resolutions (2.4 × 2.0 × 2.4 mm(3), 61.2 ms; 2.5 × 2.0 × 2.4 mm(3), 81.6 ms; 2.6 × 2.5 × 2.6 mm(3), 80 ms) and thus different total scan times. Qualitative flow analysis used 3D streamlines and time-resolved particle traces. Quantitative evaluation was based on maximum and mean velocities, flow volume, and vessel lumen area in the hepatic arterial and PV systems. RESULTS: 4D flow MRI showed good interobserver variability for assessment of arterial and PV liver hemodynamics. 3D flow visualization revealed limitations for the left intrahepatic PV branch. Lower spatio-temporal resolution resulted in underestimation of arterial velocities (mean 15%, P < 0.05). For the PV system, hemodynamic analyses showed significant differences in the velocities for intrahepatic portal vein vessels (P < 0.05). Scan-rescan reproducibility was good except for flow volumes in the arterial system. CONCLUSION: 4D flow MRI for assessment of liver hemodynamics can be performed with low interobserver variability and good reproducibility. Higher spatio-temporal resolution is necessary for complete assessment of the hepatic blood flow required for clinical applications.
Authors: Christof Baltes; Sebastian Kozerke; Michael S Hansen; Klaas P Pruessmann; Jeffrey Tsao; Peter Boesiger Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: P G Walker; G B Cranney; M B Scheidegger; G Waseleski; G M Pohost; A P Yoganathan Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 1993 May-Jun Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: R J van der Geest; R A Niezen; E E van der Wall; A de Roos; J H Reiber Journal: J Comput Assist Tomogr Date: 1998 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 1.826
Authors: Michael Markl; Andreas Harloff; Thorsten A Bley; Maxim Zaitsev; Bernd Jung; Ernst Weigang; Mathias Langer; Jürgen Hennig; Alex Frydrychowicz Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Zoran Stankovic; Martin Rössle; Wulf Euringer; Michael Schultheiss; Riad Salem; Alex Barker; James Carr; Mathias Langer; Michael Markl; Jeremy D Collins Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-04-08 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: A Frydrychowicz; A Roldan-Alzate; E Winslow; D Consigny; C A Campo; U Motosugi; K M Johnson; O Wieben; S B Reeder Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2017-06-27 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Alejandro Roldán-Alzate; Alex Frydrychowicz; Adnan Said; Kevin M Johnson; Christopher J Francois; Oliver Wieben; Scott B Reeder Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2015-03-16 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Daniel C Lee; Michael Markl; Jason Ng; Maria Carr; Brandon Benefield; James C Carr; Jeffrey J Goldberger Journal: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2015-11-20 Impact factor: 6.875